Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea

2007-04-17 Thread David R. Litwin
On 17/04/07, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, but it is not really for the end-user. To paraphrase another, it is mostly academic. Oh? I thought those ~10,000 downloads of SSHFS and ~200,000 downloads of NTFS-3G were end users.(*) Maybe I was wrong though. Thanks for the clar

Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea

2007-04-16 Thread David R. Litwin
On 15/04/07, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 14/04/07, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Before I go on, let me appologise. I don't really know what I hope to accomplish, beyond trying to garner thoughts (and support?) for the topic. Essentially: I want

Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea

2007-04-15 Thread David R. Litwin
On 15/04/07, Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 19:18 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote: By the way, forget about this FUSE business. I don't know why they're bothering: It's not real, it's slow and, in general, silly. This seems to me

Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea

2007-04-15 Thread David R. Litwin
On 14/04/07, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It is generally expected that email conversations started on-list will remain on-list, unless there is a special reason to take it off list... though maybe it was an accident on your part. It very much was. I'm not used to not being subscribed t

ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea

2007-04-13 Thread David R. Litwin
Before I go on, let me appologise. I don't really know what I hope to accomplish, beyond trying to garner thoughts (and support?) for the topic. Essentially: I want to use Linux and ZFS. I don't particularly care about licences or any of the rest of that nonsense. The code is there; it merely