On 14/03/2021 10:53, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:30:55AM +0000, David R wrote:
>> I attempted to upgrade my home server to 5.11 today. The system panics
>> soon after boot with the following :-
>>
>> In iptables by the looks of the stac
On 14/03/2021 10:30, David R wrote:
> I attempted to upgrade my home server to 5.11 today. The system panics
> soon after boot with the following :-
>
>
>
> In iptables by the looks of the stack.
>
> 5.10.23 works fine.
>
> Can provide config (and boot logs from 5.
I attempted to upgrade my home server to 5.11 today. The system panics
soon after boot with the following :-
In iptables by the looks of the stack.
5.10.23 works fine.
Can provide config (and boot logs from 5.10.23) if required.
Cheers
David
version of dkms in
Ubuntu 19.04, so I am now also back on secure boot.
No action on your part is requested at this time. Feel free to use the
new dkms.conf content if it is useful to you.
Regards,
David R. Bergstein
On 4/14/19 5:39 PM, David R. Bergstein wrote:
> Larry,
>
> Thanks f
Larry,
I tried using iw but it gives the same reading for bit rate. In regard
to the firmware, it was not installed via "make install" so I did it
manually.
Sincerely,
David R. Bergstein
On 3/2/19 12:58 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
>> Larry,
>>
>> Sorry about all t
lity=70/70 Signal level=-40 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:11 Missed beacon:0
Sincerely,
David R. Bergstein
On 3/1/19 10:16 PM, David R. Bergstein wrote:
> Larry,
>
> Please disregard my last messag
Larry,
Please disregard my last message. The firmware is now installed and the
rtw88 module is working with my wireless router. The next hurdle
appears to be setting the speed to 802.11ac as it is currently
connecting as an 802.11n client.
Sincerely,
David R. Bergstein
On 3/1/19 9:55 PM
to setup chip information
[ 267.512817] rtw_pci: probe of :3d:00.0 failed with error -114
As directed, I used the rtwpci module to perform load/unload the rtw88
module before I saw the errors above. Do I still need to install firmware?
Sincerely,
David R. Bergstein
On 3/1/19 8:46 PM, Larry
r8822be modules are loaded. If I unload the r8822be module the wifi
network connection gets terminated, even if I unload/reload the rtw88
module.
Is there something else I should be doing prior to invoking rtw88, e.g.,
blacklisting the old module?
Sincerely,
David R. Bergstein
On 3/1/19 12:28
Tony,
Thanks for your response. Can you advise as to the availability of the
new rtw88 driver? As it appears to be under development, I could not
locate a copy of the code for local compilation.
Sincerely,
David R. Bergstein
On 2/27/19 5:23 AM, Tony Chuang wrote:
>> This message is in
.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813372
At your earliest convenience, please see the bug report above, and
advise if a fix will be available for the r8822be kernel module.
Sincerely,
David R. Bergstein
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Louis Collard wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 9:03 PM, David R. Bild wrote:
>> As a point of clarification (and correct me if I'm wrong), the TPM is
>> always ready used to seed the rng. It just doesn't update the entropy
>>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Louis Collard
wrote:
>
> On some systems we have seen large delays in boot time, due to
> blocking on a call to getrandom() before the entropy pool has been
> initialized. On these systems the usual sources of entropy are not
> sufficient to initialize the pool in
My raid check also ran through cleanly, so feel free to add my Tested-By:
Cheers
David
Quoting Dominik Brodowski :
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:36:14AM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 05:01:28PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07 2017, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
>
>
I will apply this to my home server this evening (BST) and set off a
check. Will have results tomorrow.
Thanks for the fix!
David
Quoting NeilBrown :
On Mon, Aug 07 2017, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
Neil, Shaohua,
following up on David R's bug message: I have observed something similar
on
Ignore me. The increment and decrement of sync_checkers should protect
switch_to_percpu(). Sigh.
Quoting David R :
Quoting Shaohua Li :
Spent some time to check this one, unfortunately I can't find how that patch
makes rcu stall. the percpu part looks good to me too. Can you
d
Quoting Shaohua Li :
Spent some time to check this one, unfortunately I can't find how that patch
makes rcu stall. the percpu part looks good to me too. Can you
double check if
reverting 4ad23a976413aa57 makes the issue go away? When the rcu
stall happens,
what the /sys/block/md/md0/array_
On 11/05/16 19:47, David R wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please consider applying the attached patch (or something like it) to
> V4L2, and whatever is appropriate to the mainstream kernel. Without this
> my media server crashes and burns at boot.
>
> See https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/
Hi
Please consider applying the attached patch (or something like it) to
V4L2, and whatever is appropriate to the mainstream kernel. Without this
my media server crashes and burns at boot.
See https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/7/88 for more details
Thanks
David
--- drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-c
I've just had an exception to my "uneventful kernel upgrade" monotony.
My boot scripts failed when setting up the firewall due to this :-
xt_recent: hitcount (1) is larger than packets to be remembered (1)
for table
This is a completely straightforward
iptables -A -j REJECT -p
This is working fine so far - no further hangs, and networking seems
much faster into the bargain. Will report back if it happens again.
Thanks
David
On 07/04/13 22:53, Francois Romieu wrote:
> David R :
>> I'm been seeing some problems with my new ish AMD motherboard/processo
Sure. Will apply this evening. It may take several days before I can
report back due to the intermittent nature of the thing.
Thanks
David
Quoting Francois Romieu :
David R :
I'm been seeing some problems with my new ish AMD motherboard/processor
combo and networking (r8169). I se
I'm been seeing some problems with my new ish AMD motherboard/processor
combo and networking (r8169). I see the following page fault :-
Apr 7 12:25:14 david kernel: [156421.436545] AMD-Vi: Event logged
[IO_PAGE_FAULT device=02:00.0 domain=0x0015 address=0x3000
flags=0x0050]
Followed
From: "David R. Bild"
'make rpm-pkg' and 'make binrpm-pkg' fail when the kernel source is
read-only. Specifically, when the RPM spec generated by
scripts/package/mkspec is run, KBUILD_SRC happens to be set to the
source location and thus the invocation of '
Hi,
NOTE to everyone debugging this: reproduced quickly with X + firefox +
youtube (adobe flash plugin)
> Would you be so kind to test the following patch and report results?
> Apply the patch to the latest mainline.
I've had probably the same problem (dmesg below) and currently am trying
your p
Quoting richard -rw- weinberger :
Your patch is missing a Signed-off-by tag.
Please use checkpatch.pl to verify your patch.
I really didn't think it was significant enough to bother to be frank.
On the other hand I'm not sure if this change is a good idea.
sched_tunable_scaling_names is expo
Spell "logarithmic" correctly in sched debug.
--- kernel/sched/debug.c.orig 2012-11-13 11:52:59.0 +
+++ kernel/sched/debug.c2012-11-13 11:53:30.0 +
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@
static const char *sched_tunable_scaling_names[] = {
"none",
- "logaritmic",
+
On 17/04/07, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, but it is not really for the end-user. To paraphrase another, it is
mostly academic.
Oh? I thought those ~10,000 downloads of SSHFS and ~200,000 downloads
of NTFS-3G were end users.(*)
Maybe I was wrong though. Thanks for the clar
On 15/04/07, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14/04/07, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before I go on, let me appologise. I don't really know what I hope to
accomplish, beyond trying to garner thoughts (and support?) for the
topic.
Essentially: I want
On 15/04/07, Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 19:18 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
By the way, forget about this FUSE business. I don't know why they're
bothering: It's not real, it's slow and, in general, silly.
This seems to me
On 14/04/07, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is generally expected that email conversations started on-list will
remain on-list, unless there is a special reason to take it off
list... though maybe it was an accident on your part.
It very much was. I'm not used to not being subscribed t
Before I go on, let me appologise. I don't really know what I hope to
accomplish, beyond trying to garner thoughts (and support?) for the topic.
Essentially: I want to use Linux and ZFS. I don't particularly care about
licences or any of the rest of that nonsense. The code is there; it merely
Robert Hancock wrote:
> So it was tag 0 that timed out , and according to the CPBs the
> controller indeed believes the command is still outstanding, i.e. we
> didn't lose an interrupt. I'm suspicious of the fact that only one of
> two identical drives produced this error.. some kind of hardware-r
I've just upgraded my home server to 2.6.20. It's got an Athlon64 on an ASUS
nForce-4 motherboard running a 32 bit kernel. I've had to fall back to using
sata_nv.adma=0 on the kernel command line. One of the NCQ capable drives
repeatedly produced the following errors. There wasn't much disk IO goin
nland, Linus Benedict Torvalds.
Long live the king.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hello Gang
Third time around on this (posted by others)
There is no patch-2.6.13-git1* or git2* files on ftp.kernel.org.
All that is there is an empty file.
Did Katrina visit the server too?
Linus? Can you fix this?
Thanks,
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l
36 matches
Mail list logo
