Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-12 Thread David Eger
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:21:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Yes. A tree is defined by the blobs it references (and the subtrees) but > it doesn't _contain_ them. It just contains a pointer to them. A pointer to them? You mean a SHA1 hash of them? or what? Where is the *real* data stored

Re: Re: more git updates..

2005-04-12 Thread David Eger
actually mean to differentiate between the full data and a SHA1 of the data, *please please please* say "blob" in one place and "SHA1 of the blob" elsewhere. It's quite confusing, to me at least. Also, the details of just what data constitutes a 'changeset' would

Re: more git updates..

2005-04-11 Thread David Eger
So with git, *every* changeset is an entire (compressed) copy of the kernel. Really? Every patch you accept adds 37 MB to your hard disk? Am I missing something here? -dte - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mor

Re: gcc randomly crashes on my PowerBook with recent kernels...

2005-01-23 Thread David Eger
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:34:42AM +0100, René Rebe wrote: > On 16. Jan 2005, at 1:07 Uhr, David Eger wrote: > > >>BenH mentioned PREEMPTION and ReiserFS (I use) might not > >>play that well - at least not on PowerPC. > > > >Interesting. I do have Pre-em

signal handlers not linked properly in do_fork()?

2000-10-28 Thread David Eger
signal_struct's reference count, but does not set the new task's sig member. I see nowhere else in do_fork() where sig is set, either. What gives? -David Eger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO