RE: [ANNOUNCE] Darkstar Development Project

2000-09-14 Thread David A. Gatwood
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, mberglund wrote: > Because Linux already runs on a couple of platforms even NetBSD does not > run on, And vice-versa, last I checked. Let's be fair here. :-) > PS: If FreeBSD DID run on PPC and S390 and offer the company I work for NetBSD runs on lots of PPC machines, a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Darkstar Development Project

2000-09-11 Thread David A. Gatwood
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Horst von Brand wrote: > > mberglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > [...] > > > License: > > This project will not be restricted to any one license. If a piece > > of software is desirable, but under an Artistic-, BSD-, or even > > GPL-style license,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Darkstar Development Project

2000-09-11 Thread David A. Gatwood
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > I'd love to see a filesystem feature where I could efficiently identify > "changed files", where "changed" is defined by last time this application > checked or something similar. An in-filesystem revision number would do the trick. Could be REALLY eff

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Darkstar Development Project

2000-09-11 Thread David A. Gatwood
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Larry McVoy wrote: > That's a 48Kbyte/sec link. Hardly a "horribly fast network". In fact, I meant FSMlabs, but yeah. ;-) > Second of all, if you ask around, you'll find that I'm a performance guy > more than anything and that I'm not given to skewing the numbers and *i

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Darkstar Development Project

2000-09-11 Thread David A. Gatwood
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Larry McVoy wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 09:55:01PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > > Err, "faster"? The following is the moral equiv of 4 kernel updates > > > which had nothing to do using BitKeeper instead of CVS. The local copy > > > was in San Francisco and the re

Re: hfs support for blocksize != 512

2000-08-30 Thread David A. Gatwood
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > I concur with this appraisal from Al Viro. Single threading the VFS is > going backwards -- not a good idea. It sounds to me like different FSes have different needs. Maybe the best approach is to have two or three fs APIs, according to the needs of

Re: hfs support for blocksize != 512

2000-08-29 Thread David A. Gatwood
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Tony Mantler wrote: > (Obligitory disclaimer: QNX is an embedded operating system, both it's > architecture and target market is considerably different from Linux's) > > QNX's filesystem interfaces make it so painfully easy to write a filesystem > that it puts everything els