Re: [Patch 4/4] [RFC] Resend SCSI target for IBM Power5 LPAR

2005-09-07 Thread Dave C Boutcher
NULL Patch (miscounted # of patches) -- Dave Boutcher - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [Patch 2/4] [RFC] Resend SCSI target for IBM Power5 LPAR

2005-09-07 Thread Dave C Boutcher
Sysfs configuration interfaces Signed-off-by: Dave Boutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Santiago Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Linda Xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.13-rc7a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsis.c 2005-09-07 12:47:49.938952591 -0500 +++ linux-2.6.13-rc7-ibmvscsis

Re: [Patch 3/4] [RFC] Resend SCSI target for IBM Power5 LPAR

2005-09-07 Thread Dave C Boutcher
Config stuff diff -uNr linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.h linux-2.6.13-rc7-ibmvscsis/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.h --- linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.h 2005-09-06 15:56:35.231844303 -0500 +++ linux-2.6.13-rc7-ibmvscsis/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.h 2005-09

[Patch 0/4] [RFC] Resend SCSI target for IBM Power5 LPAR

2005-09-07 Thread Dave C Boutcher
The dog ate my homework. No, that's not it, the mailer ate my patches. In any case, since most of the mailing list mailers ate my (>100K) patches, here's the same thing broken up. his device driver provides the SCSI target side of the "virtual SCSI" on IBM Power5 systems. The initiator side has

Re: [RFC] SCSI target for IBM Power5 LPAR

2005-09-07 Thread Dave C Boutcher
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 12:49:32PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:28:01PM -0500, Dave C Boutcher wrote: > > This device driver provides the SCSI target side of the "virtual > > SCSI" on IBM Power5 systems. The initiator side has been in mai

Re: [PATCH] IBM VSCSI Client: handle large scatter/gather lists

2005-09-06 Thread Dave C Boutcher
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:13:25AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 17:49 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Any chance we could get this into 2.6.14? I just tested it on current > > git and as expected the number of sg elements increased. Testing a dd > > from a virtual disk wi