On Wed 2016-12-07 19:30:34 -0500, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> Your custom protocol should be designed in a way you get an aligned ip
> header. Most protocols of the IETF follow this mantra and it is always
> possible to e.g. pad options so you end up on aligned boundaries for the
> next header.
On 08/01/2013 02:29 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> It's called 'abstraction' :-)
Good, I like abstraction :)
>> It seems like a non-privileged user could use this to store arbitrary
>> data in this keyring as a way of hiding what would otherwise be
>> filesystem activity or using it for some sort of od
On 08/01/2013 01:39 PM, David Howells wrote:
> The uid is -1 or the user's own UID for the user's own cache or the uid of
> some
> other user's cache (requires CAP_SETUID). This permits rpc.gssd or whatever
> to
> mess with the cache.
Is the goal here eventually to be able to avoid the upcall t
On Tue 2013-03-12 22:23:37 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I am working with a Lenovo ThinkCentre M78, model 4865-A14, and it seems
> to have trouble with the IPMI subsystem.
>
> udev seems to hang for about 3 minutes at startup, ultimately failing
> with the following messages
Hi Linux kernel folks (Corey is explicitly listed here because of being
the only contact i could find in IPMI.txt)--
I am working with a Lenovo ThinkCentre M78, model 4865-A14, and it seems
to have trouble with the IPMI subsystem.
udev seems to hang for about 3 minutes at startup, ultimately fail
5 matches
Mail list logo
