Re: Cryogenic: Enabling Power-Aware Applications on Linux

2014-04-11 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 04/12/2014 12:05 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>>> Cryogenic is the result of my Master's Thesis, completed at the Technical >>>> University >>>> of Munich under the supervision of Christian Grothoff. You can find more >>>> infor

Re: Cryogenic: Enabling Power-Aware Applications on Linux

2014-04-11 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 04/11/2014 12:19 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> Cryogenic is the result of my Master's Thesis, completed at the Technical >> University >> of Munich under the supervision of Christian Grothoff. You can find more >> information >> about Cryogeni

Re: [PATCH] TCP: add option for silent port knocking with integrity protection

2013-12-12 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 12/12/2013 03:34 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 12:43 +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote: >> On 12/12/2013 11:19 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: >>> I think that generally, I would prefer if the code didn't use MD5 but >>> otherwise, I don't see a

Re: [PATCH] TCP: add option for silent port knocking with integrity protection

2013-12-12 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 12/12/2013 11:19 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: > I think that generally, I would prefer if the code didn't use MD5 but > otherwise, I don't see any real risk of adding an exploitable hole. It > seems silly to disable it by default though - ideally, I'd like a sysctl > to ensure that Tor could use t

Re: [PATCH] TCP: add option for silent port knocking with integrity protection

2013-12-11 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 12/11/2013 10:25 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > Stephen Hemminger writes: >> >> The point is that doing it outside of TCP core is safer, less error prone >> and more flexible. > > Or to put the question differently: what hooks would be needed to make > this efficiently work in user space? > > It cou

Re: [PATCH] TCP: add option for silent port knocking with integrity protection

2013-12-11 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 12/11/2013 09:26 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:19:00 +0100 > Christian Grothoff wrote: > >> On 12/11/2013 09:01 PM, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Christian Grothoff >>> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:35:36 +0100 >>> >>>>

Re: [PATCH] TCP: add option for silent port knocking with integrity protection

2013-12-11 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 12/11/2013 09:01 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Christian Grothoff > Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:35:36 +0100 > >> Only NAT implementations that change the SQN are not supported >> (those should be rare, but we have no hard data on this). > > Even Linux's netfi

[PATCH] TCP: add option for silent port knocking with integrity protection

2013-12-10 Thread Christian Grothoff
plications and a detailed technical report (in PDF format). Please let us know if we can do anything else to convince you to include this patch, or to expedite its adaptation. Happy hacking! Maurice Leclair, Julian Kirsch & Christian Grothoff kn...@gnunet.org Further details (from our website