Hi Andrew,
Linus has merged the Xtensa patches, so you should be ready to go.
Thanks,
-Chris
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:53:25AM +0300, Max Filippov wrote:
>> Looks like I just need to remove now redundant function definitions from
>>
I'll send the pull request as soon as possible.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:53:25 +0300 Max Filippov wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:21:40PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
Thanks Max. Running a test build and will add to xtensa-next.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Current sed script makes assumptions about the structure of rules that
> group .text sections in the vmlinux linker script. These assumptions
> get broken occasionally, e.g.: 779c
Hi Max,
Not such a big fan about these changes as they introduce additional
load and stores and a branch.
Copy spill area:
- is this only for debugging? Could the debugger identify the 'kernel
exception' frame and handle it appropriately?
- if we need it for debugging/perf, maybe move these line
Hi Max,
We could probably still use NMI with a separate stack. However, for
exception handling while in NMI, we might have to implement something
similar to x86_64 (https://lwn.net/Articles/484932/).
Cheers!
-Chris
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:0
Hi Guenter,
Sorry for the delay. Will work on it later today or tomorrow.
Thanks,
-Chris
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> xtensa:allmodconfig fails to build with the following errors.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/gk20a.c:
> In function ‘gk20a_in
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/07/2015 11:14 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>>> Linker script transformation needs to be updated to detect and handle
>>> the new section.
>> I've posted a patch for it to the linux-xtensa ML a while ago:
>> http://lists.linux-xtensa.org/piper
Hi Ricardo,
I'll add it to the xtensa-next tree today..
Thanks,
-Chris
On 9/9/14, 10:32 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
Hello Max
I really don't know who should do it, the maintainer of tty-next or
you :). I guess Greg will want that his is fixed on his tree asap,
since that build is broke
On 10/14/2013 04:49 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Buddy allocator was used here prior to commit 6656920 [XTENSA] Add
> support for cache-aliasing I can only guess that the change was made
> to make allocated page tables have the same colour, but am not sure
> why this is needed. Chris?
Max, I think yo
Hi Guenter,
On 9/2/13 7:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 08/27/2013 09:06 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
xtansa allmodbuild fails with:
arch/xtensa/kernel/xtensa_ksyms.c:129:1: error: '_mcount' undeclared
here (not in a function)
make[2]: *** [arch/xtensa/kernel/xtensa_ksyms.o] Error 1
make[1]: ***
Hi Chen,
On 06/22/2013 12:46 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> After define it, with the same .config file, also report another errors
> below, Did I use the incorrect cross-compiler tools ?
It almost seems that you are not using the cross compiler. There are two
ways to specify the cross compiler.
1. As pa
Should make it to Linus' tree shortly.
Thanks,
-Chris
On 05/07/2013 02:57 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
> ---
> arch/xtensa/include/asm/Kbuild|1 +
> arch/xtensa/include/asm/linkage.h | 16
> 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 16 dele
Hi Thomas,
On 3/28/13 2:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Chris Zankel wrote:
For Xtensa:
Acked-by: Chris Zankel
Thanks for going the extra mile and test-compiling it.
Though, the build fails later with:
arch/xtensa/kernel/built-in.o:(.init.literal+0x90): undefined
in ptrace
--------
Chris Zankel (2):
xtensa: add support for TLS
xtensa: add accept4 syscall
Marc Gauthier (1):
xtensa: dispatch medium-priority interrupts
Max Filippov (10):
xtensa: rename prom_update_property to of_update_property
x
o call the new Makefile.
Cc: Chris Zankel
Cc: Max Filippov
Cc: linux-xte...@linux-xtensa.org
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
---
This patch applies recent dtc-rule-related changes to the xtensa arch.
They couldn't be applied along with the similar changes for other archs
due to dependencies
Pressed the 'send' button a bit too fast.
On 11/07/2012 03:31 PM, Chris Zankel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking a bit into it, I think modpost is broken. I'm working on a fix.
This is specific to Xtensa. Symbols are stored in a separate '.lit'
section, but modpost do
Hi,
Looking a bit into it, I think modpost is broken. I'm working on a fix.
Cheers!
-Chris
On 11/06/2012 03:57 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Perhaps we should CC more people..
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:47:18PM +0200, Kasatkin, Dmitry wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote
set for 3.7-rc4
--------
Chris Zankel (3):
xtensa: allow multi-inclusion for uapi/unistd.h
xtensa: use physical addresses for bus addresses
xtensa: reset windowbase/windowstart when cloning the VM
Max Filippov (3):
xtensa: sw
dc241f2c1761bfdec85915f4bbf7e750663f3442:
xtensa: switch to generic sys_execve() (2012-10-25 15:00:44 -0700)
Xtensa patchset for 3.7-rc4
Chris Zankel (3):
xtensa: allow multi-inclusion for uapi
Hi Ben,
On 10/27/2012 11:26 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 17:06 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> [...]
>> #define __NR_available287 287
>> -__SYSCALL(287, sys_faccessat, 0)
>> +__SYSCALL(287, sys_ni_syscall, 0)
> [...]
>
> Why was this one un-plumbed rather
Hi Greg,
Could you please include this patch in the next stable tree? It adds
system calls required for libc builds, so would be great to have it there.
Thanks,
-Chris
From 72b843f6fa14a818a833625d78d8023828366bb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Zankel
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:59:28
Hi Stephen,
Sorry, I accidentally pushed this patch up; should be fixed the next
next time you pull.
Thanks,
-Chris
On 10/21/2012 04:40 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Chris,
Today's linux-next merge of the xtensa tree got a conflict in
arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h between commit
missing system calls to the syscall table (2012-10-19
10:46:44 -0700)
Xtensa patchset for 3.7-rc2
Chris Zankel (3):
xtensa: fix memmove(), bcopy(), and memcpy
Hi Greg,
Thanks for adding it.
Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel
On 10/10/2012 03:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Frederic Weisbecker
commit 11ad47a0edbd62bfc0547cfcdf227a911433f207 upstream
8
for you to fetch changes up to 70cefe765433529fc894fd1995a1d5883cb33e05:
xtensa: Setup CROSS_COMPILE at the top (2012-10-04 12:16:20 -0700)
Xtensa patchset for 3.7
----
Chris Zanke
tterhoeven wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Chris Zankel wrote:
Patchset for the Xtensa architecture for 3.7
I think you forgot https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/10/560
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux be
Hi Linus,
On 10/03/2012 03:41 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
That should be
git://github.com/czankel/xtensa-linux tags/xtensa-next-20121003
which is the public git address of that server.
Sorry about that. I mistakenly used 'origin' instead of the actual address.
However, you now do have a s
Chris Zankel (1):
MAINTAINERS: add Max Filippov as an xtensa port maintainer
Max Filippov (25):
xtensa: fix linker script transformation for .text.unlikely
xtensa: ISS: only build networking if configured
xtensa/PCI: fix WT caching
Hi Arnd,
Given the recent renewed push for Xtensa, I'll step in to feed the
changes upstream. We might change that in future, though.
Max has volunteered to help bring the Xtensa port up-to-date. Most of
the recent development was done on outdated trees and never got
submitted in true kernel
Hi Max,
On 08/07/2012 09:43 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Chris Zankel wrote:
Hi Max,
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The l
rom xtensa-linux on it.
I propose doing the testing on this board and any other tasks / issues
you think I can help, I'd be glad to.
Excellent!! I'm looking forward to your help.
-Chris
Vadim.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Chris Zankel <mailto:ch...@zankel.net>> wrote:
Hi Max,
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest working kernels for
xtensa are 2.6.29...31 trees hosted at the git.linux-xtensa.org.
I wouldn't say it's in bad
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for pointing this out. I'm working on a fix.
BTW, which branch do you use? release or testing?
Thanks,
-CHris
Adrian Bunk wrote:
With git-xtensa I'm getting:
<-- snip -->
...
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/arch/xtensa/Makefile:30: *** No
Xtensa toolchain foun
Andrew,
Andrew Morton wrote:
This generates unfixable-by-me rejects against Sam's git-kbuild tree.
Sam already had a pull request into Linus for that tree. Could I ask
that you wait for that piece of dust to settle and then regenerate the
diff?
Thanks Andrew. I will wait for his updates.
-Ch
regressions for other architectures.
We also need to suppress warnings for two informational
sections (.xt.lit and .xt.prop) used by the Xtensa architecture.
Signed-off-by: Chris Zankel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
index 3
Jeremy,
Could you please add the ELF architecture-magic number for Xtensa (94)
when you finally submit this patch?
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
This patch cleans up the ELF headers and their users. It does several
related things:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/elf-const.h
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
Jesper,
Thanks for the patches. I'll take a look at the entry.S one and will
pass it along to Andres, and will incorporate the signal.c patch.
I am currently working on the system call interface and am removing the
non-rt signal calls, so the signal.c patch probably doesn't apply
cleanly any
37 matches
Mail list logo
