what I
get for changing more than one thing at once.
--
Chris Murphy
This appears to be new in 4.19 rc5. But it doesn't happen every boot.
Details and attachments in the bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201227
[ 35.502605] f29h.local kernel: pci_bus :02: Allocating resources
[ 51.172922] f29h.local kernel: thunderbolt :03:00.0: timeout
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Yesterday I saw oom killer knocking off processes during a simple cp
> -a from one Btrfs to another, in a VM, with kernel
> 4.8.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc25.x86_64. The call trace looks different than
> Markus' so I'm not sure
't happened on 4.7.0 though. According ot koji
this is Linux v4.7-6438-gc624c86
This is 'journalctl -o short-monotonic -b-4 -k'
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_2Asp8DGjJ9ZC1JSDJnaWpnSEE
Chris Murphy
I'm
not sure the mount info code distinguishes between bind mounts.
At the moment, this is something of a secret decoder ring where if you
see subvolid=5 first, then anything after that other than / is just
not true (can't be). Hence probably why both subvolid and subvol are
listed for now; you kinda have to parse them both.
--
Chris Murphy
sn't there an XFS test
for both balance+convert and ext4 convert? If not, shouldn't there be?
It's not a data loss bug but Btrfs is in a transitional stretch where
functionality loss bugs are no longer minor. (I'd look but I'm lazy
and xfs tests doesn't appear to be indexe
urrent week's rc (which is rc5) if you
can accept a bit more risk for testing purposes.
--
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordom
[btrfs]()
It's known.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/7/41
--
Chris Murphy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ch points to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062833#c24
Which points to this patch:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=139233546723342&q=raw
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to ma
x27;s uncertain if the hardware I have has a
unique problem, or if it's a model specific behavior.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
e. The
manifestation is merely limited battery life, about 1 hour. All testing is
always done with power connected.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Oct 7, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 10:24 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>
>>> From 4451da32414080bd0563ee9e061f19bf90463cc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Henrik Rydberg
>> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:15:03 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] applesmc remedy take 2
>>
>> Conjec
On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:33:00PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:24:10PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>>>
est, but I
>> have not had the time to check this very deeply myself:
>>
> I like this patch much more than the previous patch. Chris, can you test it ?
Yes. Building now. What kernel message should I be looking for? At least on
2011 and 2012 laptops I have yet to see an Oops related to smc. The kernel with
previous patch at least is not causing problems on them so far, which works
well as I can test more on the 2008 model.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:09:26PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:33:13AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>>
>
On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:33:13AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:55:26PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>>>>
On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:55:26PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
Warning message triggered with 3.12.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc21.x86_64.
[ 10.886016] applesmc: key count changed from 261 to 1174405121
>>>
>>> Explains the crash,
On Sep 27, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 11:03 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:41:42AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>&
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:21:04PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> This suggests that initialization may be attempted more than once. The
>> key cache
>> is allocated only onc
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:41:42AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:21:04PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>> On Th
On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Are they in 3.9.0-0.rc5.git2.1.f19? I'm seeing a regression from 3.8.5 with
>> the radeon driver not finding BIOS ROM as well.
>> ht
On Apr 2, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Garrett
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 11:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>>> Chris still has problems (see
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927451), but I don't know
>>> whether the
ldn't want this "fast recovery" behavior if you're at your critical number
of disks remaining or you lose the array upon a few seconds worth of subsequent
problems. So we kinda need context specific behavior.
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
ot; out the gate, something's
happened to it and now it's failing as you suspect.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?276187-Raid-Locks-Up
Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...
24 matches
Mail list logo
