On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> I agree; this is what we should do first because someone might want it
> for backports.
Got an idea how far this can be ported back?
I'm being hampered by severe performance issues on a
beagleboneblack-like device (am335x) running on 3.18 ker
Signed-off-by: Charles Manning
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 33 ++---
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 8b73ede..ec41922 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7
igned-off-by: Charles Manning
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index ec41922..9e92170 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1973,6 +1973,10 @@ struct clk *__clk_register(struct device *dev, s
The init pointer is not valid after clk_register so we store
the names with the socfpga clock structures so we can look them up.
Signed-off-by: Charles Manning
---
drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-gate.c | 44 ++--
drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-periph.c | 16
way better to pass the init pointer as
an argument rather than as a pointer in hw.
Charles Manning (3):
clk : Clean up checkpatch warnings
clk: Prevent a hanging pointer being abused
clk: socfpga Change name look-up to not use the init pointer
drivers/clk/clk.c
On Friday 15 December 2006 10:01, Nikolai Joukov wrote:
> > Nikolai Joukov wrote:
> > > We have designed a new stackable file system that we called RAIF:
> > > Redundant Array of Independent Filesystems.
> >
> > Great!
Yes, definitely...
I see the major benefit being in the mobile, industrial and
6 matches
Mail list logo