Re: [PATCH 3/3] serial: 8250: omap: restore registers on shutdown

2015-08-06 Thread Charles Manning
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Peter Hurley wrote: > I agree; this is what we should do first because someone might want it > for backports. Got an idea how far this can be ported back? I'm being hampered by severe performance issues on a beagleboneblack-like device (am335x) running on 3.18 ker

[PATCH 1/3] clk : Clean up checkpatch warnings

2014-07-21 Thread Charles Manning
Signed-off-by: Charles Manning --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 33 ++--- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index 8b73ede..ec41922 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -99,7 +99,7

[PATCH 2/3] clk: Prevent a hanging pointer being abused

2014-07-21 Thread Charles Manning
igned-off-by: Charles Manning --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index ec41922..9e92170 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -1973,6 +1973,10 @@ struct clk *__clk_register(struct device *dev, s

[PATCH 3/3] clk: socfpga Change name look-up to not use the init pointer

2014-07-21 Thread Charles Manning
The init pointer is not valid after clk_register so we store the names with the socfpga clock structures so we can look them up. Signed-off-by: Charles Manning --- drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-gate.c | 44 ++-- drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-periph.c | 16

[PATCH 0/3] clk : Fix SOCFPGA clk crash and some clean up

2014-07-21 Thread Charles Manning
way better to pass the init pointer as an argument rather than as a pointer in hw. Charles Manning (3): clk : Clean up checkpatch warnings clk: Prevent a hanging pointer being abused clk: socfpga Change name look-up to not use the init pointer drivers/clk/clk.c

Re: [ANNOUNCE] RAIF: Redundant Array of Independent Filesystems

2006-12-14 Thread Charles Manning
On Friday 15 December 2006 10:01, Nikolai Joukov wrote: > > Nikolai Joukov wrote: > > > We have designed a new stackable file system that we called RAIF: > > > Redundant Array of Independent Filesystems. > > > > Great! Yes, definitely... I see the major benefit being in the mobile, industrial and