On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 15:00 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:33:02 -0700 Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
>
> > It does, but "rdac" _is_ for a SCSI device.
>
> It does __what__ ? depend on SCSI?
Yes, as you understood it correctly :)
> I don&#
/md/dm-rdac.ko] undefined!
> make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
>
> Presumably DM_MULTIPATH_RDAC needs to depend on SCSI (not enabled
> here) since it uses scsi_normalize_sense.
--
----------
Chandra Seethar
the lock?
>
> > + h->ctlr->submitted = 1;
> > + goto drop_lock;
> > +fail_path:
> > + dm_pg_init_complete(h->path, MP_FAIL_PATH);
> > +drop_lock:
> > + spin_unlock(&h->ctlr->lock);
> > +}
--snip--
---
From: Chandra See
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 14:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:02:42 +0100
> Alasdair G Kergon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This patch from Chandra Seetharaman and updated to upstream by
Teams * Testing & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> ___________
> ckrm-tech mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
>
--
---
bine them to achieve some of the goals CKRM tries to achieve
> in
> a much simpler (unixy ;) way.
>
>
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc:
> A global provider of Threat Management Solutions.
> Download our Hom
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:25:44AM -0800, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:53:19 PST, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:03 -0800, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
> > > The code provides a fairly simple mechanism for adding controllers for
> > > any resource type
> >
> > Last
undreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> ___________
> ckrm-tech mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf
the moment.
We want to have only one CE active at any point of time, for that we need
to have some internal variable. using atomic helps us get that along with
protecting against a very unlikely race condition.
>
> gerrit
--
---
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:21:12AM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
> [ For those who have already reached a conclusion on this
> subject, there is little that is new below. It's just
> cast in a different light, as an analysis of how well
> the CKRM cpuset/memset task class that Chandra describes
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:54:52AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, February 10, 2005 6:46 pm, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:59:28AM -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:42:34PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
>
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:59:28AM -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:42:34PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
--stuff deleted---
> memset_controller would be similar to this, before pitching it I will talk
> with Matt about why he thought that there is a problem.
ading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______
> ckrm-tech mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
--
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
