As a tangential party, I am a bit curious: does the randomization
plugin result in a compact structure? I ask because I know many/most
programmers don't bother with it and so doing so ought to make the
data more compact.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> how is the code to be v
>
> "{ NULL }" is valid ISO C, but unfortunately "{}" is not.
Just make the thing "static const" and don't use an initializer.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:22 AM, James Simmons
>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
>> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock
>> *req, __u64 *flags,
>> int added = (mode == LCK_NL);
***
My typing follows a line with a bunch of stars. That is followed by
command output.
***
The failing devices using usb-devices script have "no such file" errors:
T: Bus=01 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=01 Cnt=02 Dev#= 27 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=
This is likely the wrong list, so I apologize in advance.
Google didn't get me where I need to go.
I have a USB 3.0 hub and switch that I need to use to switch devices
between a Linux desktop, laptop and MacBook Pro. At first, I was
testing with just a keyboard and mouse.
The switch is connected
On 04/27/16 15:20, James Simmons wrote:
From: Bruce Korb
Convert most of the ldlm lock's l_flags references from direct
bit twiddling to using bit specific macros. A few multi-bit
operations are left as an exercise for the reader.
The changes are mostly in ldlm, but also in llite, osc
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> >> Anyone know what this is?
> >>
> >> 00:07.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3050 (rev 30)
> >> Flags: medium devsel
> >
> >if its pci id is 0x11063050, then it's a VIA Power Management Controller.
>
> 00:07.3 Class 0600: 1106:3050 (rev 30)
Lukasz Trabinski wrote:
> include/linux/pci_ids.h:#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_OXSEMI_16PCI954 0x9501
>
> (IMHO that is correct), but in kernel 2.2.18 we have:
> (include/kernel/pci.h)
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_OXSEMI_16PCI954PP0x9513
> ^^
>
> Please correct
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [AC]
> > > ... added basic support for the Pentium IV.
> [Android]
> > How is the Pentium IV more advanced than the Pentium III, other than
> > speed? Why would LInux care about a 1500 MHz clock or 400 MHz bus
> > speed? Just treat the PIV as a faster PIII
Frédéric L . W . Meunier wrote:
>
> Alan Cox wrote:
...
There are several typos, but it is not clear if they are all
from ide-pci.c, or in the other files (pci.ids and pci_ids.h).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
The information about PCI devices is scattered about the kernel
and, consequently, is inconsistent. This patch puts the PCI/IDE
bridge information into a text database along with the data from
include/linux/pci_ids.h and drivers/pci/pci.ids. I may have mis-
typed a few things, but the 2.4.
11 matches
Mail list logo
