Re: ipv6 && kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:126!

2013-06-07 Thread Brian Haley
On 06/07/2013 02:33 PM, Tommi Rantala wrote: > Hello, > > Hit this while fuzzing v3.10-rc4-214-g1612e11 (plus a one-liner > af_netlink patch from Patrick McHardy, that I hope is not related to > this bug). > > Tommi > [19491.615447] Call Trace: > [19491.616273] [] skb_push+0x33/0x40 > [19491.61

Re: [PATCH 1/6] net-next: replace obsolete NLMSG_* with type safe nlmsg_*

2013-03-28 Thread Brian Haley
On 03/27/2013 12:47 PM, Hong Zhiguo wrote: > Signed-off-by: Hong Zhiguo > diff --git a/net/ieee802154/netlink.c b/net/ieee802154/netlink.c > index 97351e1..9247252 100644 > --- a/net/ieee802154/netlink.c > +++ b/net/ieee802154/netlink.c > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct sk_buff *ieee802154_nl_create(int

Re: [PATCH net-next?] pktgen: Use simpler test for non-zero ipv6 address

2012-10-10 Thread Brian Haley
On 10/10/2012 02:42 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > Found by looking for if (foo) ; tests with a perl regex > > Yes Eric, it could be 2 compares instead of 4 on 64-bit > systems with HAS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. Maybe later > or if there are other tests that could become something > like ipv6_is_zero