Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-12 Thread Bret Indrelee
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote: > Bret Indrelee wrote: > > > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote: > > > Bret Indrelee wrote: > > > > Keep all timers in a sorted double-linked list. Do the insert > > > > intelligently, adding it

Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-12 Thread Bret Indrelee
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote: > Bret Indrelee wrote: > > Keep all timers in a sorted double-linked list. Do the insert > > intelligently, adding it from the back or front of the list depending on > > where it is in relation to existing entries. > &g

Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-12 Thread Bret Indrelee
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Mark Salisbury wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Bret Indrelee wrote: > > Current generation PCs can easily handle 1000s of > > interrupts a second if you keep the overhead small. > > the PC centric implementation of the ticked system is one of its major

Re: No 100 HZ timer!

2001-04-11 Thread Bret Indrelee
andle 1000s of interrupts a second if you keep the overhead small. -Bret ------ Bret Indrelee | Sometimes, to be deep, we must act shallow! [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -Riff in The Quatrix - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern