Notes" but left TODOs for
> brendanhigg...@google.com who tracked down the runtime issue in GCC.
> To be clear: these are not issues specific to KUnit, but rather to UML.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
> Reviewed-by: David Gow
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
d lockdep splats.
>
> This patch therefore changes the test->lock usage to spin_lock_irqsave()
> and spin_unlock_irqrestore().
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Glitta
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:43 AM Marco Elver wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 13:53, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:05 AM David Gow wrote:
> [...]
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +Sanitizers
> > > +==
> > > +
>
> The "sanitizers" have originally been a group of tools that rel
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:05 AM David Gow wrote:
>
> The kernel now has a number of testing and debugging tools, and we've
> seen a bit of confusion about what the differences between them are.
>
> Add a basic documentation outlining the testing tools, when to use each,
> and how they interact.
>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:27 AM Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> hOn Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 9:10 PM David Gow wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for writing this: it's good to have these things documented at last!
> >
> > There are definitely a few things this document points out which still
> > need deciding, which d
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 10:19 AM Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:30 AM Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 12:57, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/1/21 11:24 PM, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 21:04, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> > > >> >
o the API docs and leave filling in the blanks as an exercise to
> the reader.
>
> Also give an example of kunit_fail_current_test().
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
> Fixes: 359a376081d4 ("kunit: support failure from dynamic analysis tools")
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:04 PM 'Daniel Latypov' via KUnit Development
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:16 AM 'Marco Elver' via KUnit Development
> wrote:
[...]
> > #else
> > static inline bool slab_add_kunit_errors(void) { return false; }
> > #endif
> >
> > And anywher
il, KUNIT_FAIL("msg") exists)
>
> In that case, you'd get:
> > Expected "hello" == "world", but
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4
>
> Also add in such a fragment for kunit itself so we can give that as an
> example more close to home (and thus less likely to be accidentally
> broken).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/ycnf4yp1db97z...@mit.edu/
>
ot;):
> [15:19:34] [FAILED] example_simple_test
> [15:19:34] # example_simple_test: initializing
> [15:19:34] # example_simple_test: lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:24:
> message
> [15:19:34] not ok 1 - example_simple_test
>
> Co-developed-by: Daniel Latypov
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
> Signed-off-by: Uriel Guajardo
> Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 1:56 AM Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> From: Johannes Berg
>
> It's not always desirable to collect coverage data for the
> entire kernel, so split off CONFIG_GCOV_BASE. This option
> only enables linking with coverage options, and compiles a
> single file (reboot.c) with them a
nge log as
you can see in this example [2] (note that everything after
"Signed-off-by: David Gow \n ---" and before
"tools/testing/kunit/configs/broken_on_uml.config | 2 ++" is discarded
by git am).
Anyway, aside from these minor points of LKML best practices, this
patc
.
>
> Fixes 97752c39bd ("kunit: kunit_tool: Allow .kunitconfig to disable config
> items")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:54 PM Lucas Pires Stankus
wrote:
>
> Tidy up code by fixing the following checkpatch warnings:
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> CHECK: Lines should not end with a '('
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stankus
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Thanks!
nel can boot to the point
> where tests can actually run.
>
> Fixes: f289041ed4 ("mm, page_poison: remove CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING_ZERO")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:58 PM Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:40 AM Alan Maguire wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, David Gow wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:14 AM Daniel Latypov
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Uriel Guajardo
> > > >
> > > > Add a kunit_fa
quences as a result of the
> changes needed to plumb in this suite name glob.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210201205514.3943096-1-dlaty...@google.com/
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
t; that usage.rst is more of optional further reading.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
(Though, people could create a separate
> directory if wanted; this patch imposes no restrictions on the path).
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 2:54 PM Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> When using `kunit.py run` to run tests, users must populate a
> `kunitconfig` file to select the options the tests are hidden behind and
> all their dependencies.
>
> The patch [1] to allow specifying a path to kunitconfig promises to make
>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 3:52 PM Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> The primary change is that we want to encourage people to respect
> KUNIT_ALL_TESTS to make it easy to run all the relevant tests for a
> given config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
from the
> list for _every_ outer iteration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:23 PM David Gow wrote:
>
> When a number of tests fail, it can be useful to get higher-level
> statistics of how many tests are failing (or how many parameters are
> failing in parameterised tests), and in what cases or suites. This is
> already done by some non-KUnit te
de-effects right now.
>
> Fixes: 6ebf5866f2e8 ("kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit
> tests")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Whoah, nice catch! I didn't even know that was a thing!
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
>
> This passes the "kunit_filter.glob" commandline option to the UML
> kernel, which currently only supports filtering by suite name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
sed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select
> specific suites.
> So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
One minor issue below, otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
> ---
> lib/kunit/Kconfig| 1 +
> l
(Though, people could create a separate
> directory if wanted; this patch imposes no restrictions on the path).
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:15 PM Kees Cook wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:45:25PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> > I ran into a couple of problems with kunit tests taking too much stack
> > space, sometimes dangerously so. These the the three instances that
> > c
s message with a trailing "but"
> > Expected 2 + 2 == 5, but
> >
>
> It didn't feel worth adding a check up-front to see if both sides are
> literals to handle this better.
>
> *A quick grep suggests 100+ comparisons to an integer literal as the
> right hand side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
I don't feel very strongly about this either way. In any case:
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
so makes mypy discover a number of new violations.
> Exclude main() since we reuse `request` for the different types of
> requests, which mypy isn't happy about.
>
> This commit fixes all but one error, where `TestSuite.status` might be
> None.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
> Reviewed-by: David Gow
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
ws the precedent in commit 3fc48259d525 ("kunit: Don't
> fail test suites if one of them is empty").
>
> Also slightly simplify the code and add type annotations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
> Reviewed-by: David Gow
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
type and mypy.
>
> Add an optional boolean that can be used to disable this for use cases
> in the future where we might not need/want to load the config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 3:48 PM Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> The authors of this tool were more familiar with a different
> type-checker, https://github.com/google/pytype.
>
> That's open source, but mypy seems more prevalent (and runs faster).
> And unlike pytype, mypy doesn't try to infer types so i
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 2:32 PM David Gow wrote:
>
> Various helper functions were misspelling "diagnostic" in their names.
> It finally got annoying, so fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 2:32 PM David Gow wrote:
>
> Various helper functions were misspelling "diagnostic" in their names.
> It finally got annoying, so fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
de
> guidance for testing many inputs") to show a minimal example of the new
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
l Latypov
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
t check of exception types. self.assertRaises does this.
> * s/kall/call. There's no reason to name it this way.
> * This is probably a misunderstanding from the docs which uses it
> since `mock.call` is in scope as `call`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
m outside.
>
> Do so to make the code more Pythonic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
cabvgosnh0gz7z5jhrcgyg1wg0zddbtlosucob-gwmexlgvt...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Fixes: 5578d008d9e0 ("kunit: tool: fix running kunit_tool from outside kernel
> tree")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
type and mypy.
>
> Add an optional boolean that can be used to disable this for use cases
> in the future where we might not need/want to load the config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Very nice! This makes the code much more readable!
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
ws the precedent in commit 3fc48259d525 ("kunit: Don't
> fail test suites if one of them is empty").
>
> Also slightly simplify the code and add type annotations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
> Reviewed-by: David Gow
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
so makes mypy discover a number of new violations.
> Exclude main() since we reuse `request` for the different types of
> requests, which mypy isn't happy about.
>
> This commit fixes all but one error, where `TestSuite.status` might be
> None.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
> Reviewed-by: David Gow
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
t.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=757055ae8dedf5333af17b3b5b4b70ba9bc9da4e
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow
> Fixes: 757055ae8ded ("init/console: Use ttynull as a fallback when there is
> no console")
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
Thanks for taking care of this!
n be turned into subsubtest outputs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com>
> Co-developed-by: Marco Elver
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:25 PM David Gow wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:08 PM Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 08:21, David Gow wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:41 PM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.a...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Implementation of support fo
t mentioned
> elsewhere [1]) which are particularly useful in these situations.
>
> It is also criminally underused at the moment, only appearing in 2
> tests (both written by people involved in KUnit).
>
> [1] not even on
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
75.namprd13.prod.outlook.com/T/
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
ore code examples in
the future?
Anyway, like I said, I think this patch in and of itself looks pretty good.
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 66 +
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation
rn this off on UML or whether we do the fix you proposed here
though. Nevertheless, I would like to see *some* fix go in before
v5.10 is released.
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
The tools/testing/kunit/test_data/ directory was marked as binary
because some of the test_data files cause checkpatch warnings. Fix this
by dropping the .gitattributes file.
Fixes: afc63da64f1e ("kunit: kunit_parser: make parser more robust")
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
too
uot;bye" == 1625079500
>
> After this patch:
> Expected "hi" == "bye", but
> "hi" == hi
> "bye" == bye
>
> KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERT_STRUCT() was written but just mistakenly
> not actually used by KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() and friends.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 8:22 AM Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Tue 2020-11-03 12:52:23, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 04:40:49PM +0530, Arpitha Raghunandan
> ---
> v2:
> * Pass `struct kunit *` to mock init's to allow allocating ops structs.
> * Update kunit-example-test.cc to do so as a more realistic example.
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200918183114.2571146-1-dlaty...@google.com/
> ---
>
> Brendan
el/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit-fixes&id=21a6d1780d5bbfca0ce9b8104ca6233502fcbf86
>
> Fixes: 21a6d1780d5bbfca0ce9b8104ca6233502fcbf86 ("kunit: tool: allow
> generating test results in JSON")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 5:45 AM wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:35:26AM +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:32:52 -0700 Brendan Higgins
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:27 AM SeongJae Park wrote:
&g
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 3:36 PM Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 02:16:56PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 10/21/20 2:15 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:37 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > > wrote:
> > >>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:04 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:53:50AM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:06 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:47:50AM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:06 AM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:47:50AM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:40 PM David Gow wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:46 AM Daniel Latypov
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add basic test coverage for files tha
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 9:26 AM Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:06 AM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:47:50AM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:40 PM David Gow wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:46 AM Daniel Latypov
enabled), it was not printing anything.
>
> Fixes: 45ba7a893ad89114e773b3dc32f6431354c465d6 ("kunit: kunit_tool:
> Separate out config/build/exec/parse")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow
Thanks for fixing this!
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
ce future confusions.
>
> [1] Commit d43c7fb05765 ("kunit: tool: fix improper treatment of file
> location")
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Thanks for this! This is something I meant to fix a while ago and forgot about.
One minor issue, this patch does not apply on torvalds/master right
now. Could you please rebase this?
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:37 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>
> EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS selects EXT4_FS, thus enabling an optional feature the
> user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on
> EXT4_FS instead.
>
> Fixes: 1cbeab1b242d16fd ("ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended
Placing it elsewhere will make it do
> wrong assumptions.
>
> Fixes: aac35468ca20 ("kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for
> all tests")
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
commit updates the document for this.
>
> Fixes: 9fe124bf1b77 ("kunit: allow kunit to be loaded as a module")
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park
> Reviewed-by: David Gow
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Some tests logs for kunit_tool tests are missing their test plans
causing their tests to fail; fix this by adding the test plans.
Fixes: 45dcbb6f5ef7 ("kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP format")
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
Add KUnit tests for Aspeed I2C driver to test setting clock divider
registers given an input clock speed.
I wrote this test a while ago and it found a bug in the Aspeed I2C
driver a couple years ago[1].
Link[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/989312/
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
: kunit: add bitfield test conversion to KUnit")
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20201015163056.56fcc...@canb.auug.org.au/
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Thanks for taking care of this so quickly!
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:22 AM Vitor Massaru Iha wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:23 AM wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:46:21AM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:25 AM wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:57:17PM -0300, Vitor Massaru
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 1:13 PM Brendan Higgins
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:19 AM Rasmus Villemoes
> wrote:
>
> Sorry about the late reply. I saw activity on this before and thought
> it was under control. I only saw the unresolved state now looking
> through patc
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 03:28:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 01:37:10PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Mon 2020-08-17 09:06:32, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > > On 17/08/2020 06.30, Arpitha Raghunandan wrote:
> > > > Converts test lib/test_printf.c to KUnit.
> > > > Mor
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:19 AM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
Sorry about the late reply. I saw activity on this before and thought
it was under control. I only saw the unresolved state now looking
through patchwork.
> On 21/08/2020 13.37, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Mon 2020-08-17 09:06:32, Rasmus Vill
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:00 AM Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 14:10 -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:58 AM Vitor Massaru Iha
> > wrote:
> > > This adds the conversion of the runtime tests of test_bitfield,
> > >
n only concatenate str (not "OSError") to str
> so fix this with an explicit cast to str.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins
Cheers!
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:24 PM Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:31 AM Daniel Latypov wrote:
> >
> > # Background
> > KUnit currently lacks any first-class support for mocking.
> > For an overview and discussion on the pros and cons, see
> > https://martinfowler.com/articles/m
5578d008d9e0 ("kunit: tool: fix running
kunit_tool from outside kernel tree")
Link:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?id=5578d008d9e06bb531fb3e62dd17096d9fd9c853
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 12 --
Alltests flag evidently stopped working when run from outside of the
root of the source tree, so fix that. Also add an additional broken
config to the broken_on_uml config.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
tools/testing/kunit/configs/broken_on_uml.config | 1 +
tools/testing/kunit
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:55 PM Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> On 9/8/20 6:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 9/8/20 5:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Randy,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap
> >> wrote:
> >>>
&g
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:31 PM Eddie James wrote:
>
> Mask the IRQ status to only the bits that the driver checks. This
> prevents excessive driver warnings when operating in slave mode
> when additional bits are set that the driver doesn't handle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James
> Reviewed-by: Ta
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes since 20200828:
> >>
> >
> >
> > on i386:
> >
> > ../lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’:
> > ../lib/ubsan.c:141:2: err
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:28 AM Marco Elver wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 18:17, David Gow wrote:
> [...]
> > > First of all, thanks for the talk yesterday! I only looked at this
> > > because somebody pasted the LKML link. :-)
> >
> > No worries! Clearly this document needed linking -- even
0996679f0998 kunit: kunit_config: Fix parsing of
> CONFIG options with space
>
> Code Style Documentation: [0]
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha
> Link: [0]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200620054944.167330-1-david...@google.com/T/#u
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
It
0996679f0998 kunit: kunit_config: Fix parsing of
> CONFIG options with space
>
> Code Style Documentation: [0]
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha
> Link: [0]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200620054944.167330-1-david...@google.com/T/#u
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Pro
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:51 PM Vitor Massaru Iha wrote:
>
> This adds the conversion of the runtime tests of test_user_copy fuctions,
> from `lib/test_user_copy.c` to KUnit tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Thanks!
Can you put these together in the same patch series as you had before?
When I asked you to split the patch up, I was just asking about that
specific patch within the series. I still think all the patches go
together.
As for this specific patch, I see one minor issue below; other than
that, this look
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:26 AM SeongJae Park wrote:
>
> From: SeongJae Park
>
> This commit adds more test cases for the new feature, 'init_regions'.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
Currently kunit_tool does not work correctly when executed from a path
outside of the kernel tree, so make sure that the current working
directory is correct and the kunit_dir is properly initialized before
running.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 13
#post
Signed-off-by: Heidi Fahim
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 35 +++---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_json.py | 63 ++
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 33 ++
3 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 6
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:56 PM Bird, Tim wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brendan Higgins
> > Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 7:17 PM
> >
> > From: Heidi Fahim
> >
> > Add a --json flag, which when specified when kunit_too
to sign off on this.
In the future, make sure to run get_maintainers.pl
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
> ---
> lib/ubsan.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/ubsan.c b/lib/ubsan.c
> index cb9af3f6b77e..1460e2c828c8 100644
> --- a/lib/ubsan.c
.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Uriel Guajardo
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:43 PM Uriel Guajardo wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:37 PM Uriel Guajardo
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Uriel Guajardo
> >
> > KUnit tests will now fail if lockdep detects an error during a test
> > case.
> >
> > The idea comes from how lib/locking-selftest [1] checks for
gt;
> [1]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7.12/source/lib/locking-selftest.c#L1137
>
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200806174326.3577537-1-urielguajard...@gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Uriel Guajardo
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:45 PM David Gow wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 9:17 AM Brendan Higgins
> wrote:
> >
> > Currently kunit_tool does not work correctly when executed from a path
> > outside of the kernel tree, so make sure that the current working
>
]: https://api.kernelci.org/schema-test-group.html#post
Signed-off-by: Heidi Fahim
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 35 +++---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_json.py | 63 ++
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 33
Currently kunit_tool does not work correctly when executed from a path
outside of the kernel tree, so make sure that the current working
directory is correct and the kunit_dir is properly initialized before
running.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 8
1
]:
https://github.com/isaacs/testanything.github.io/blob/tap14/tap-version-14-specification.md#the-plan
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
---
lib/kunit/executor.c | 17
lib/kunit/test.c | 11 ---
tools/testing
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
---
include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
index 052e0f05a9841..75130a4d92ef0 100644
--- a
1 - 100 of 605 matches
Mail list logo
