>
> Of course. Now we just need the code to determine when a task
> is holding some kernel-side lock ;)
couldn't it just be indicated on actual locking the resource?
lynx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M
> did "these" apply only to the tasks, that actually hold a lock?
> if not, then i don't like this idea, as it gives the processes
> time for the only reason, that it _might_ hold a lock. this basically
> undermines the idea of static classes. in this case, we could actually
> just make the "nice
i have compaq presario 1245 and kernel 2.4.2 does not do power off on
shutdown although all necessary kernel options are compiled in..
lynx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://v
> Not necessarily. Please read the other replies (specifically mine) to
> discover the real answer as to why modules can _legally_ have negative
> use counts.
thanks to all the replies, I think it is a bug in the module since the
use count is -3 :). it is ltmodem driver for lucent win modems..
hi,
what does negative module use count mean?
lynx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
can someone explain what is nagle or pinpoint explanation :)
lynx
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 07:35:12PM -0500, Dan Maas wrote:
>
> Bingo! With this fix, 2.2.18 performance becomes almost identical to 2.4.0
> performance. I assume 2.4.0 di
can we filter him out?
someone left the insane clinic door unlocked...
lynx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
7 matches
Mail list logo