CFS & rt-preempt : orthogonal patches possible ?

Hallo (Ingo), testing something regarding linuxpps I want to do it against the "latest and greatest kernel ever" too. rt-preempt is common from audio already. CFS something new and promising. But the patches conflict in their combination. Is there something against this type of combination? Is

Re: ntp.c : possible inconsistency?

> Without a further explanation of this craziness, it's a little hard to > discuss... Let's try it: time_constant is created for internal use of ntp.c and added by 4 -               time_constant = min(txc->constant + 4, (long)MAXTC); +               time_constant = min(txc->constant + 4, (long)MAX

ntp.c : possible inconsistency?

Hi, trying to find reasons for some crazy ntpd-behavior I read http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/27/67 This thread doesn't result in a pulished patch, so I (hopefully) did what was said there. The patch doesn't break my system, but it doesn't change ntpd's crazyness too. Nevertheless it should be di