Its a T41 "without p" :)
On Apr 8, 2005 9:09 PM, Nish Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2005 11:28 PM, AsterixTheGaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2,
> > > except th
RADEON_DEVICE_ID=4c66
RADEON_DISP_MISC_CNTL=5b300600
RADEON_GPIO_MONID=
RADEON_GPIO_MONIDB=0300
RADEON_GPIO_CRT2_DDC=0300
RADEON_GPIO_DVI_DDC=0013
RADEON_GPIO_VGA_DDC=0003
RADEON_LVDS_GEN_CNTL=003dffa1
On Apr 8, 2005 12:09 PM, AsterixTheGaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Err... never mind... I was not doing any radeon control.
On Apr 8, 2005 11:58 AM, AsterixTheGaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2,
> > except that neither returns from suspend-to-ram with video restored on
> &
> FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2,
> except that neither returns from suspend-to-ram with video restored on
> the LCD. I believe I was able to get video restored on an external CRT
> in either 2.6.12-rc2 or 2.6.12-rc2-mm1, but the LCD still didn't
> restore (can v
Hi,
> -#define module_init(x) __initcall(x);
> +#define module_init(x) __initcall(x); __module_init_disable(x);
It would be better if there is brackets around them... like
#define module_init(x) { __initcall(x); __module_init_disable(x); }
then we know it wont break some code like
if (..)
mod
5 matches
Mail list logo