Re: ServeRaid 4M with IBM netfinity and kernel 2.4.x

On Friday 16 February 2001 03:29, Stéphane Borel wrote: > I should add that the behaviour of serveraid under 2.4 is somehow > strange : during fsck for instance, it seems to get stuck and won't > go further if we don't strike a key on the keyboard. It just a gues, but try disable write back cach

strange tcp errors

Messages in my kernel log: node1 kernel: sending pkt_too_big to self node1 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->lost_out == 0) failed at tcp_input.c(1202):tcp_remove_reno_sacks Kernel 2.4.1-ac13. Maybe someone want to say me what does it mean and how serious it is? Any fixes? Thanks. -- Andrius [E

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1

On Saturday 10 February 2001 22:16, David Ford wrote: > Just as an aside, I've watched this conversation go on and on while I > run reiserfs on several servers, workstations, and a notebook. I > have current kernels and have watched carefully for corruption. I > haven't seen any evidence of cor

Problems with 2.4.2-pre1 & reiser & vfs

Hello, I have dual PIII 800 machine running as mail server on DAC 960 RAID & reiserfs comming with 2.4.1kernel. Under very high loads I get following messages in my kernel log: kernel: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data of object [7906789 7906806 0x0 SD](nlink == 1) not found (pos 23)

LOCKUP on CPU x

kernel: Serial driver version 5.02 (2000-08-09) with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled Hope this helps to find out problem. If I somehow could help debuging - just let me know. Thanks for reading. -- // Andrius AdomaitisSistemu Administratorius // [EMAIL PROTECTED]UAB Gaumina dizain

Strange vmstat report...

Hello, I am not sure if this is kernel related or procps utils, but: [root@castle log]# vmstat 1 5 | tail -6 | awk '{ print $16 }' id 1 1 19884107 <-- is this normal?! 1 0 Kernel 2.4.0-test2-ac2, procps-2.0.7. Thanks. -- // Andrius AdomaitisSistemu Administratorius // [EM