Re: [patch -mm 26/28] x86-64 block irq balancing for timer

Am Sat 23 Jun 2007 11:27:20 PM CEST schrieb Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:32 +, Thomas Gleixner wrote: plain text document attachment (x86-64-clockevents-irq-balancing.patch) From: Venki Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Disable irq balancing on IRQ0. this

Re: [Intel-IOMMU 02/10] Library routine for pre-allocat pool handling

Am Fr 08.06.2007 21:01 schrieb Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:21:57 -0700 > "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:27:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:57:00 -0700 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >

Re: [patch 13/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Consistently wrap paravirt ops callsites to make them patchable

Am Di 20.03.2007 06:54 schrieb Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Zachary Amsden wrote: > > For VMI, the default clobber was "cc", and you need a way to allow > > at > > least that, because saving and restoring flags is too expensive on > > x86. > > According to lore (Andi, I think), asm()

Re: [PATCH][5/5][resend] floppy.c: Fix device_create_file() warning

> The floppy driver's sysfs file just provides some auxiliary > information to user-space, none of which matters for most of > its users. It is IMO totally inappropriate to fail floppy > driver init in this case. I thought it was for udev to create the device nodes? But I might be wrong on that.

Re: [PATCH] Add an offset in the cyc2ns computation to fix sched_clock jumps

Am Fr 16.03.2007 19:30 schrieb Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 19:14 +0100, Guillaume Chazarain wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The scheduling problems I reported in the thread: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/3/128 > > are caused by the set_cyc2ns_scale() function called when