Re: [OT] Re: Your response is requested

- Original Message - From: "Dale Amon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "J Sloan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Your response is requested > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:34:36PM -0700, J Sloan wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro

Re: [BUG?] AMD 5x86 and 2.4 (was Re: [BUG?] AMD K5 and 2.4)

> It looks like I was mistaken in my original message. I have an AMD 5x86, not > a K5. Careful. AFAIK, '5x86' (without anything added) is a description for Cyrix/IBM processors ONLY. 5x86/6x86/6x86MX are _also_ Cyrix names for CPUs. 'MMX' is a registered (!) trademark by Intel Corp., so Cyrix

Re: AMD CPU misdetection?

- Original Message - From: "Vince Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A plain K6: >model : AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions > > A K6-2: >model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor > > A K6-3: >model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D+ Processor > > A K6-2+: > model name

Re: [patch-required!] Recent kernels show problems in handling VERY large HDs

> Interesting. So far I have been able to help three or four people > with a similar setup, but without EZDrive. Hmmm...maybe it's me who let himself fool by the docs. Well they told me if Capacity Limiter is used, you MUST use EZDrive to get full capacity. Let's hope this _is_ a must. I get to

Re: [patch-required!] Recent kernels show problems in handling VERY large HDs

> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Andreas Eibach wrote: > ... > >ide0: BM-DMA at 0x4000-0x4007, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio > >ide1: BM-DMA at 0x4008-0x400f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio > ... > >hda: 120060864 sectors (61471 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=7473/255/63, UD

[patch-required!] Recent kernels show problems in handling VERY large HDs

Hi everybody, my name is Andreas Eibach and it's the first time I'm here. I'm aware of the fact that posting here requires having read ALL FAQs and available documents before doing that. I did this, of course. But since the problem seems brand-new (due to the fact that these hug