On 05.01.2021 07:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 08:04:08PM +0100, Andre Tomt wrote:
On 28.12.2020 13:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
From: Stylon Wang
commit a135a1b4c4db1f3b8cbed9676a40ede39feb3362 upstream.
EDID parsing in S3 resume pushes new display modes
to
On 28.12.2020 13:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
From: Stylon Wang
commit a135a1b4c4db1f3b8cbed9676a40ede39feb3362 upstream.
EDID parsing in S3 resume pushes new display modes
to probed_modes list but doesn't consolidate to actual
mode list. This creates a race condition when
amdgpu_dm_connector
On 09. okt. 2018 11:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 05:21:31AM +0200, Andre Tomt wrote:
On 08. okt. 2018 20:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.13 release.
There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a
On 08. okt. 2018 20:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.13 release.
There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
CC [M] net/ipv4/
On 04. sep. 2018 08:10, Andre Tomt wrote:
On 04. sep. 2018 07:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Full test log link,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/404027#L4051
Does Linus's tree also crash with this patch applied? Being "bug
compatible" is good :)
thanks,
On 04. sep. 2018 07:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Full test log link,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/404027#L4051
Does Linus's tree also crash with this patch applied? Being "bug
compatible" is good :)
thanks,
greg k-h
I suspect it is because we're missing upstream commi
On 23. aug. 2018 17:44, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 03:44:18PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Two users have reported [1] that they have an "extremely unlikely" system
with more than MAX_PA/2 memory and L1TF mitigation is not effective. In fact
it's a CPU with 36bits phys limit (64G
On 24. des. 2017 20:37, Ivan Kozik wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.9 release.
There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these bein
On 18. okt. 2015 03:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.2.4 release.
There are 258 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
There is a new build
On 01. okt. 2015 13:52, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte
wrote:
On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote:
commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af
Author: Eric Dumazet
Date: Thu Aug 13 15:44:51 2015 -0700
inet: fix potential deadlock in reqsk
On 01. okt. 2015 00:37, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux
4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help :
Congratulations! You're not the first one to get hit
On 29. sep. 2015 12:21, Andre Tomt wrote:
> Meanwhile I'll revert both the mentioned net patches and see how it goes.
So that blew up as well, meaning it's not any of these two patches:
[PATCH 4.1 124/159] net: do not process device backlog during unregistration
[PATCH 4.1 125/1
On 29. sep. 2015 10:39, Andre Tomt (LKML) wrote:
> I just had another hang with it reverted on two different guests..
> However it took nearly 6 hours rather than the usual "few minutes" for
> these two. So now I'm a little unsure about my initial conclusions.
>
>
On 26. sep. 2015 22:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Julian Anastasov
[ Upstream commit 2c17d27c36dcce2b6bf689f41a46b9e909877c21 ]
Incoming packet should be either in backlog queue or
in RCU rea
On 26. sep. 2015 22:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.9 release.
There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be ma
On 09. aug. 2015 00:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
commit 9c0fa8dd3d58de8b688fda758eea1719949c7f0a upstream.
This commit needs upstream commit
0bc2f2f7d080561cc484d2
On 04. juni 2014 20:27, Greg KH wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Dave, I saw you mention that you were seeing the "Bad rss-counter" line
> on 3.15-rc1, but I couldn't find any follow-up on this to see if anyone
> figured it out, or did it just "magically" go away?
>
> I ask as Brandon is seeing this same mes
*testing hat on*
PAM within namespaces (say, LXC) does not work anymore with 3.14-rc8,
making login, ssh etc fail in containers unless you boot with audit=0.
This is due to a change in return value to user space; and is
appearantly a known issue as evident in this earlier post from february:
http
On 11. feb. 2014 20:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
You have been warned.
It has yet to blow up for me on a few workstations, a router, couple
laptops ranging from old and crusty to brand new, some KVM and a couple
of Xen, all on x86-64 Core 2 to Haswell, about 24h in.
--
André Tomt
--
To uns
Hi Greg, David.
The patches for the sock_diag privilege escalation issue in 3.3-3.8
seems to be missing. Would be good to get those out the way before 3.7
is retired.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/260062
Hmm. Seems to be missing stable tag and CC. David?
smime.p7s
Descript
David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Andre Tomt wrote:
It has not crashed yet with the patch though.
It seems that one of the tweks in this patch made the watchdog
act better than before. So unless I hear from you (before the
start of next week) that some other message
David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Andre Tomt wrote:
Can you try this diagnostic patch, to see if it reports any messages
about IAA and/or IAAD oddities? There's surely a quick workaround
for this, but I'd rather understand the root cause before patching.
Doesn'
David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Andre Tomt wrote:
Got this on a serial console today, using 2.6.25-rc2-git1. Machine was
not doing anything interesting at the time, but has its / and kernel on
a usb-storage device (usb pen drive).
Can you try this diagnostic patch, to see
Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Andre Tomt wrote:
Got this on a serial console today, using 2.6.25-rc2-git1. Machine was
not doing anything interesting at the time, but has its / and kernel on
a usb-storage device (usb pen drive).
Intel ICH8R chipset (and USB controller), running
Got this on a serial console today, using 2.6.25-rc2-git1. Machine was
not doing anything interesting at the time, but has its / and kernel on
a usb-storage device (usb pen drive).
Intel ICH8R chipset (and USB controller), running x86_64 kernel. I'll
post .config and some additional info when
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
at the risk of spawning yet another thread and another flamefest,
what *are* the kernel features that should be considered candidates
for removal, either now or at some point in the future.
please, no discussions about mechanisms or kernel warnings or the
like -- just
Chris Wright wrote:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (1):
DCCP: Fix exploitable hole in DCCP socket options
Does this fix cure CVE-2007-1730 and CVE-2007-1734, or just one of them?
They both seem to be in the exact same code path the patch touches.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Just got sata_mv working under the new EH, on my 6041.
It probes and talks to disks just fine (chip doesn't support ATAPI),
and hotplug actually has a chance of working.
The 'mv-eh' branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git mv-eh
It's
Patrick Ale wrote:
The drivers load correctly but my drives seem to be in a different
order all the time, which is not very convinient when your run md
devices.
md does not rely on device names, it can work on array UUID's too (check
out man mdadm.conf).
So, my question is: how do I force a
Michael Thonke wrote:
Jeff Garzik schrieb:
Michael Thonke wrote:
There is no other way to use a nearly good chipset for AMD64 cpus.
Via's chipsets are really buggy not acceptable, so what else ULi/Ali
who cares where to buy?
What specifically does not work, on VIA+AMD64 combination, und
Matt M. Valites wrote:
Hail List,
I've been banging my head against this for a few days, and I wanted to
see if anyone here could lend a hand.
I have the following configuration:
P4 3.x Ghz
2GB Ram;
2 x 36GB WD Raptors; in a RAID1 (sda)
2 x 74GB WD Raptor (those 10K RPM SATA drives) in a RAID1(sdb)
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
<
[1] although my drive is blacklisted (Seagate barracuda - ST3200822AS),
I "unblacklisted" it to get full performance - it's under heavy stress
for 12th hour, and still no error.
It could be that your drive has newer firmware. Too bad firmware
upgrades for HD's are har
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Well you could build a monilithic kernel with module loading turned off
entirely, but that doesn't prevent replacing libc which most programs
use to make those system calls.
As pointed out elsewhere, modules is not the only way to load kernel
code live. Modules is just a cl
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
For those of you that are interested...
I kind of sort of miss the load and bandwidth statistics on the
kernel.org front page. Did they just go boring now with sufficient
hardware resources? :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Andre Tomt wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
Since this document is a bit our of date:
http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html
What's out-of-date about that URL?
Jeff
A update on the Marvell status? :-P
No Marvell status change, so no need to u
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
Since this document is a bit our of date:
http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html
What's out-of-date about that URL?
Jeff
A update on the Marvell status? :-P
Anyway, is there any of the current work on Marvell available somewhere,
so that some
George Georgalis wrote:
Here is a problem with 2.6.10:
while read file; do mplayer $file ; done
or
tail -n93 mediafiles.txt | while read file; do mplayer $file ; done
for each file path in that text file I get:
Failed to open /dev/rtc: Permission denied (it should be readable by the user.)
^- Thi
[just adding netdev to CC, from LKML]
Michal Vanco wrote:
Hello,
I see this problem running 2.6.11 on dual AMD64:
Running quagga routing daemon (ospf+bgp) and issuing "netstat -rn |wc -l"
command
while quagga tries to load more than 154000 routes from its bgp neighbours
causes this trap:
Unable t
Alan Cox wrote:
Functionality
o PWC USB camera driver
o Working ULI526X support (added to base in .11 but broken)
o ATP88x support
o Intelligent misrouted IRQ handlers
o Fix PCI boxes that take minutes IDE probing
o Remove bogus confusing XFree86 keyboard messag
Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:59:17PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
An example that doesn't fit:
A patch of me to remove an unused function was accepted into 2.6.11 .
Today, someone mailed that there's an external GPL'ed module that uses
this function.
A patch to re-add this function as i
really bensoo_at_soo_dot_com wrote:
Hi;
i'm crashing my box twice a day running 2.6.11-rc4
when i turn on the Athlon-XP CPU bus disconnect.
When network activity is up over maybe 120KB/s and
i'm playing a video file at the same time, then
chances are good i'll lock up the box.
Box runs a Chaintech
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Patch URL, BK URL, and changelog attached.
Recent changes:
* New sata_qstor driver.
* Turn on ATAPI by default.
* Change a couple unconditional use-the-hardware function calls to be
callbacks instead. Should have been this way originally.
* Most of C/H/S support.
* Fix bugs in
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:38:13PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
It is just the first such thing I found, scanning rt6i_idev uses
will easily find several others.
You're right of course. I thought they were all harmless but I was
obviously wrong about this one.
So here is a patc
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:38:13PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
It is just the first such thing I found, scanning rt6i_idev uses
will easily find several others.
You're right of course. I thought they were all harmless but I was
obviously wrong about this one.
So here is a patc
jerome lacoste wrote:
Attached the output of smartctl -a /dev/hda, whatever that helps.
Judging from the SMART output, this drive seems hosed. All firmware
controlled extended off-line self-tests have failed on LBA 92491576, and
it has a worrying amount of re-allocated sectors.
New laptop harddr
Janos Farkas wrote:
On 2005-01-21 at 15:44:44, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I am running 2.6.10 from kernel.org on Debian Sid ppc/x86, the same
issue occurs with 2.6.9. Though, 2.6.8.1 and previous are fine.
When my ISP connection via PPPoE (kernel side) goes down, reconnection
does not occur, and the ke
Jasper Koolhaas wrote:
As soon as the system had booted hdg has completely vanished, even in
single user mode:
# ls /dev/hd* /dev/sd*
/dev/hda /dev/hda3 /dev/hdc1 /dev/hde /dev/hde3 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb1
/dev/hda1 /dev/hda4 /dev/hdc2 /dev/hde1 /dev/sda /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb2
/dev/hda2 /d
> Go ahead, call me idiot :).
Idiot. :-)
--
Regards,
Andre Tomt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
m crashes, files just getting lost
etc. After changing the motherboard and CPU for new ones, this server has
been running flawlessly ever since on 2.4.2-pre4.
Now all I need is some OpenWall'ish patch for 2.4.x that works ;)
Great work guys :-)
--
Regards,
Andre Tomt
-
To unsubscribe from
a software
bug. Well, time will tell :-)
Thanks for the input
--
Regards,
Andre Tomt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
Very recently I installed a new mailserver for my company, based around
qmail, linux 2.4.1, and software raid 1.
It works very nicely untill it spews out oops's after a few days, leaving
hundreds of qmail-popup processes hanging, unkillable. THe server is very
lightly loaded for now, doing only a
> > This issue is fixed in 2.2.18 AFAIK (never seen it since).
>
> Nope.
>
> It's fixed 2.2.19pre2 (which includes the Andrea Arcangeli's vm-global-7
> patch that (among other things) fixes this.)
I stand corrected. Still, with almost-vanilla 2.2.18 (+ ow patches) on a
highly loaded webserver has
> Hi... I have a question or two that would help me clear up a bit
> of the fuzz
> I have relating to the VM: do_try_to_free_pages issue.
> About once a week I get the 'VM: do_try_to_free_pages ...' error and
> eventually get a complete system lockup. And just this morning it
> locked up
> agai
> I was in your position, I feel it may be a mistake.
> I personaly do not trust the 2.4.x kernel entirely yet, and would
> prefer to
> wait for 2.4.1 or 2.4.2 before upgrading from 2.2.18 to ensure last-minute
> wrinkles have been completely ironed out, and I know there are people who
> share my
> Something I seen on a lug. Anyone have a patch for this?
>
> I'm trying to compile a 2.2.17 kernel. When I do a make bzImage, I get
> this error. It seems to be centering on networking areas (nfs, svclock,
> tcp, etc.)
>
> tcp_input.c:1393:52: warning: pasting would not give a valid preproces
I have to be wicked crazy - but:
Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010
(experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000
It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet.
The reason I tried the kernel with 2.97 was the -march=athlon option.
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 01:05:10PM +0200, Andre Tomt wrote:
> > The sym53c8xx driver handles this card nicely in u160scsi mode using
> > kernel 2.4testX, but I don't want that kernel on this machine. 2.2.17 does
> > not detec
an't check right now -
I converted from cable to ISDN/dialup a few days ago, and a already feel
my wallet shrinking at a rapid pace (bastards charge by the second).
If anyone has some info - I'm wide open :)
--
Greets,
Andre Tomt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: se
really belonging on this list anyhow.
--
Greets,
Andre Tomt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
.
Remember, I'm not talking fragmented reads here. Thats is a whole
different universe. .
--
Andre Tomt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
et A, lacks the latest
chipset improvements and supports at most UDMA66. I can't speak of newer
athlon motherboards - because I havn't tested any else yet. This baby will
do for a while :-)
--
Andre Tomt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
I know, replying "to the wrong person" is a little weak, but I lost the
original post in a hardware lockup on my workstation (2.4-test9, latest DRI
CVS code, mga HALlib), so this has to go. And please forgive me about
posting from MS Outlook Express this time, it's only temp :-)
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2
62 matches
Mail list logo
