):
>
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 02:15:53PM +0100, Łukasz Majczak wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I have started bisecting your patch and I have figured out that there
> > might be something wrong with clamping - with comments out these lines
> >
",
clamp(spfn, zone_spfn, zone_epfn), clamp(epfn, zone_spfn, zone_epfn));
for (pfn = spfn; pfn < epfn; pfn++) {
if (!pfn_valid(ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages))) {
pfn = ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages)
Best regards,
Lukasz
śr., 27
which is a part of AP ->
serial chain as kernel messages are considered sensitive from a
security standpoint.)
Best regards,
Lukasz
śr., 27 sty 2021 o 12:19 Mike Rapoport napisał(a):
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:08:17AM +0100, Łukasz Majczak wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> &g
2:29AM +0100, Łukasz Majczak wrote:
> > Crash after mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
> >
> > Hi,
> > I was trying to run v5.11-rc5 on my Samsung Chromebook Pro (Caroline),
> > but I've noticed it has crashed - unfortunately it seems
Crash after mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
Hi,
I was trying to run v5.11-rc5 on my Samsung Chromebook Pro (Caroline),
but I've noticed it has crashed - unfortunately it seems to happen at
a very early stage - No output to the console nor to the screen, so I
have s
Hi Jarkko, Guenter
Yes, here are the logs when failure occurs -
https://gist.github.com/semihalf-majczak-lukasz/1575461f585f1e7fb1e9366b8eceaab9
Look for a phrase "TPM returned invalid status"
Guenter - good suggestion - I will try to keep it as tight as possible.
Best regards,
Lukasz
pon., 25
Thanks Ricardo - I have checked it on Eve/Google Pixelbook
Tested-by: Lukasz Majczak
czw., 21 sty 2021 o 18:33 Rojewski, Cezary
napisał(a):
>
> On 2021-01-21 6:16 PM, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > If dobj->control is not initialized we end up in an OOPs during
> > skl_tplg_complete:
> >
> > [ 26
Hi Pierre,
Is there anything more to do to get the ACK for this patch?
Best regards,
Lukasz
wt., 12 sty 2021 o 12:34 Łukasz Majczak napisał(a):
>
> Hi,
>
> This is just a kind reminder. Is there anything more required to
> upstream this patch?
>
> Best regards,
> Lukasz
Hi,
This is just a kind reminder. Is there anything more required to
upstream this patch?
Best regards,
Lukasz
czw., 17 gru 2020 o 14:06 Lukasz Majczak napisał(a):
>
> There is no check for the kcontrol against NULL and in some cases
> it causes kernel to crash.
>
> Fixes: 2d744ecf2b984 ("ASoC
Hi,
I am also ok with Harsha patch. I have checked it on my Eve and it looks ok.
Best regards,
Lukasz
śr., 1 lip 2020 o 19:08 Pierre-Louis Bossart
napisał(a):
>
>
> >>> Tested and the following is something we can use without creating a new
> >> dailink.
> >>> struct snd_soc_dai *c
ct snd_soc_dpcm thus we cannot use
container_of() on it.
Best regards,
Lukasz
pon., 29 cze 2020 o 18:51 N, Harshapriya napisał(a):
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Łukasz Majczak
> > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 4:11 AM
> > To: N, Harshapriya
> > Cc: a
Hi Harsha,
We would like to continue the work on this, could you please suggest
the correct approach.
Best regards,
Lukasz
czw., 21 maj 2020 o 20:10 Pierre-Louis Bossart
napisał(a):
>
>
>
> On 5/21/20 12:30 PM, Łukasz Majczak wrote:
> > Hi Pierre
> >
> > If you wi
it sets min/max channels to 2
while for the "Kbl DMIC cap" it can be 2 or 4, that's is why I'm
trying to split this, but maybe I'm missing here something.
Best regards,
Lukasz
czw., 21 maj 2020 o 19:17 Pierre-Louis Bossart
napisał(a):
>
>
>
> On 5/21/20 12:08 P
>
> don't add a new dailink, this is not right.
>
Can you advise a better solution how to assign different fixup
functions to mic and to speakers? I was looking at "dmic01" dailink in
skl_nau88l25_max98357a.c as an example.
Best regards,
Lukasz
Pierre
Sorry, I didn't get it for the first time, you are suggesting to not
use DMIC01 as it is used by PCH-attached
dmics by other drivers.
Best regards,
Lukasz
czw., 21 maj 2020 o 16:36 Łukasz Majczak napisał(a):
>
> Yes, my bad
> it should be:
> + { "codec1
Yes, my bad
it should be:
+ { "codec1_in", NULL, "DMIC01 Rx" },
+ { "DMIC01 Rx", NULL, "AIF1 Capture" },
The whole idea of taking the mic for SSP0 definition is that each BE
should have its own fixup. Before there was one fixup function, which
checked inside which BE is connected to wh
16 matches
Mail list logo