file)
Ok, I haven't tried it (can't reboot a machine now), and I don't know
what I am talking about, but the idea is simply ``if CLONE_PTRACE is set,
and the parent is ptraced, then the child's effective parent should be
its grandfather.''
Was it the way it was intend
tion I
want). But I would just like to be sure that there are no mechanism
already available by which it is possible to ptrace reliably a child.
Éric Brunet
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordo
more important that the possibility to
ptrace across forks, but I still think that there should be a way to
attach the children of a ptraced-process. Is there currently a way to
achieve this in the kernel that I am not aware of ?
Éric Brunet
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
EME,0,0,0);
execve(the_debugged_process,args,env);
}
It is more portable, more traditionnal and works very well.
Éric Brunet
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.k
eally weird and useless. I could simulate
the current behaviour simply by calling ptrace(TRACE_ME,..) in the child.
What is the real use of the CLONE_PTRACE flag ?
Éric Brunet
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PR
top has been in suspend mode.
>
Nobody can help me to understand where this bug comes from and how I
could fix it or get around it ? (For instance by reinitializing the sound
subsystem, knowing that it is not a module but built inside the kernel.)
Thank you very much by advance
Éric Brunet
6 matches
Mail list logo
