Apparently, this test completes successfully when it completes execution
without either causing a kernel panic or being killed by the kernel.
This new test result message is more descriptive and grammatically
correct.
Signed-off-by: Brigham Campbell
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/mov_ss_trap.c
Convert the PMEM device tree binding from text to YAML. This will allow
device trees with pmem-region nodes to pass dtbs_check.
Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pmem/pmem-region.yaml | 49 +++
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
2 files c
Fixes a small typo in a comment; helping to improve clarity in code comment.
Signed-off-by: Sukrut Heroorkar
---
tools/testing/selftests/dma/dma_map_benchmark.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/dma/dma_map_benchmark.c
b/tools/testing/s
On Fri, 16 May 2025 20:25:33 -0700
Sumanth Gavini wrote:
> Fix "withouth" to "without"
> Fix "instaces" to "instances"
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumanth Gavini
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_end_flavors_test.sh | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Thank you for fixin
From: Konrad Dybcio
Enable the SLPI remoteproc and declare the firmware path.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-crd.dts | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-crd.dts
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-crd.
From: Konrad Dybcio
SC8280XP features a SLPI (Sensor Low Power Island) core. Describe it.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 99 ++
1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
b/ar
From: Konrad Dybcio
Certain /soc@0 subnodes are very out of order. Reshuffle them.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 574 -
1 file changed, 287 insertions(+), 287 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280x
From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Enable SLPI / Sensors DSP present on the SC8280XP platforms / Lenovo
X13s laptop.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/a
From: Konrad Dybcio
>From the software POV, it matches the SM8350's implementation.
Describe it as such, with a fallback.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
.../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8350-pas.yaml | 54 --
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --g
SC8280XP features a SLPI, much like its distant relative, SM8350.
This series adds the bindings and dt node for it (also cleaning up the
DTSI in meantime)
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio
---
Changes in v2:
- Added FastRPC nodes
- Added the X13s/CRD patches
- Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/2
On 5/17/25 12:11 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 11:27:06AM +0800, Lijuan Gao wrote:
>> Add nodes for remoteprocs: ADSP and CDSP for QCS615 SoC to enable proper
>> remoteproc functionality.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio
>> Signed-off-by: Lijuan Gao
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/b
On 5/16/2025 9:15 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 11:14:38AM +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
The rproc_detach() function invokes __rproc_detach() before
rproc_unprepare_device(). The __rproc_detach() function sets the
rproc->state to "RPROC_DETACHED".
However, the TI K3 M4 dri
Signed-off-by: Sameeksha Sankpal
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 14ba51b52095..d6a85d7b26da 100644
---
Fix some grammar mistake and improve clarity of output messages
and comments in rtctest.c. Fix format of message in accordance to
other output messages in rtctest.c.
Signed-off-by: Nidhish Chauhan
---
tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+),
On Sat, 17 May 2025 at 04:17, Rae Moar wrote:
>
> Add the test counts to the JSON output from kunit.py. For example:
>
> ...
> "git_branch": "kselftest",
> "misc":
> {
> "tests": 2,
> "passed": 1.
> "failed": 1,
> "crashed": 0,
> "skipped": 0,
> "errors": 0,
> }
> ...
>
> T
On Sat, 17 May 2025 at 03:06, Rae Moar wrote:
>
> The documentation on testing static functions using the KUnit macros
> VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT and EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT is lacking clarity and
> missing key steps in the example. This has caused bugs and confusion
> among developers.
>
> Improve wording
On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 11:26 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Designate the "module:${modname}" symbol namespace to mean: 'only
> export to the named module'.
>
> Notably, explicit imports of anything in the "module:" space is
> forbidden.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
> ---
> static v
* Sukrut Heroorkar wrote:
> Fixes a small grammatical error in the print message.
No it doesn't.
> signed-off-by: Sukrut Heroorkar
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/ioperm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ioperm.c
> b
18 matches
Mail list logo