On 4/8/25 14:34, Jason Wang wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 10:27 AM Bui Quang Minh wrote:
On 4/7/25 08:03, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:39:03 +0700, Bui Quang Minh
wrote:
When pausing rx (e.g. set up xdp, xsk pool, rx resize), we call
napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi. In
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:59:58AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 09:02, Peng Fan wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 10:32:39PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> >Hi Bjorn,
>> >
>> >
>> >Thanks for replying this thread.
>> >
>> >On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:48:58AM -0500, Bjorn Ander
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 7:37 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 03:02:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:20 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 02:01:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > This patch introduces virtqueue ops
Change the behaviour of a lingering close(): instead of waiting for all
data to be consumed, block until data is considered sent, i.e. until worker
picks the packets and decrements virtio_vsock_sock::bytes_unsent down to 0.
Do linger on shutdown() just as well.
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj
---
> From: Shuah Khan
> [...]
>
> Applied for Linux 6.15-rc2
>
> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-
> kselftest.git/log/?h=fixes
Thanks for reviewing and considering this fix.
-Qiuxu
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 03:33:04PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Extend the sheaf infrastructure for more efficient kfree_rcu() handling.
> For caches with sheaves, on each cpu maintain a rcu_free sheaf in
> addition to main and spare sheaves.
>
> kfree_rcu() operations will try to put objects o
In order to make it easier to add more configuration for the tests and
more support for runtime detection of when tests can be run pass the
structure describing the tests into test_clone3() rather than picking
the arguments out of it and have that function do all the per-test work.
No functional c
Hi Linus,
Please pull the following kunit fixes update for Linux 6.15-rc2
Fixes tool to report test count in case of a late test plan when tests
are specified before the test plan. Fixes spelling error in the commit
that went into 6.15-rc1.
diff is attached.
thanks,
-- Shuah
-
The pull request you sent on Tue, 8 Apr 2025 16:31:50 -0600:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
> tags/linux_kselftest-kunit-6.15-rc2
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/a24588245776dafc227243a01bfbeb8a59bafba9
Thank you!
While almost all users of shadow stacks should be relying on the dynamic
linker and libc to enable the feature there are several low level test
programs where it is useful to enable without any libc support, allowing
testing without full system enablement. This low level testing is helpful
during b
On 3/29/25 08:02, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2025, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
+#if defined(_MIPS_SIM) && _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_NABI32
+/*
+ * MIPS N32 is the only architecture where __kernel_ulong_t
+ * does not match the bitness of syscall arguments.
+ */
+typedef unsigned long long
On Tue, Apr 08 2025 at 17:34, Tim Bird wrote:
>> -Original Message-
> For what it's worth, I've always been a bit skeptical of the use of the
> python git module
> in spdxcheck.py. Its use makes it impossible to use spdxcheck on a kernel
> source tree
> from a tarball (ie, on source not
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 3:48 PM Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> On 4/7/25 16:59, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> > pid_max.c: In function ‘pid_max_cb’:
> > pid_max.c:42:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mount’
> > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > 42 |
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Mon, 07 Apr 2025 20:26:31 +0200 you wrote:
> Recently, during a debugging session using local MPTCP connections, I
> noticed MPJoinAckHMacFailure was strangely not zero on the server side.
>
> The first patch fixes th
On 4/7/25 20:42, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
Hi Shuah Khan,
Just a gentle ping regarding this patch.
If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks!
-Qiuxu
From: Zhuo, Qiuxu
[...]
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] selftests/mincore: Allow read-ahead pages to reach the
end of the file
When run
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 06:05:19PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>
> On 4/8/2025 4:58 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:18:05PM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >> Hello, Paul,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:16:08 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> >>> This commit adds a ne
On 4/8/25 08:21, André Almeida wrote:
Thank you Edward,
Em 04/04/2025 19:12, Edward Liaw escreveu:
Testcase should fail if -EWOULDBLOCK is not returned when expected value
differs from actual value from the waiter.
Fixes: 9d57f7c79748920636f8293d2f01192d702fe390 ("selftests: futex: Test
sys_f
pid_max.c: In function ‘pid_max_cb’:
pid_max.c:42:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mount’
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
42 | ret = mount("", "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE | MS_REC, 0);
| ^
pid_max.c:42:36: error: ‘MS_
On 4/7/25 16:59, T.J. Mercier wrote:
pid_max.c: In function ‘pid_max_cb’:
pid_max.c:42:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mount’
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
42 | ret = mount("", "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE | MS_REC, 0);
|
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 10:40:10PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> The test_memcg_protection() function is used for the test_memcg_min and
> test_memcg_low sub-tests. This function generates a set of parent/child
> cgroups like:
>
> parent: memory.min/low = 50M
> child 0: memory.min/low = 75M, m
Hello, Paul,
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:16:08 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> This commit adds a new rcutorture.n_up_down kernel boot parameter
> that specifies the number of outstanding SRCU up/down readers, which
> begin in kthread context and end in an hrtimer handler. There is a new
> kthread ("r
On 4/8/2025 4:58 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:18:05PM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> Hello, Paul,
>>
>> On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:16:08 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>>> This commit adds a new rcutorture.n_up_down kernel boot parameter
>>> that specifies the number of o
Hi Tim
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 20:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> > Let me know if anyone objects to me working up a refactoring of spdxcheck.py
> > eliminating the use of the python 'git' module, and submitting it for
> > review.
>
> No objection from me!
SGTM. Depending on how much time you ne
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:18:05PM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hello, Paul,
>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:16:08 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> > This commit adds a new rcutorture.n_up_down kernel boot parameter
> > that specifies the number of outstanding SRCU up/down readers, which
> > begin in
* Malaya Kumar Rout wrote:
> Exception branch returns without closing
> the file descriptors 'file_fd' and 'fd'
>
> Signed-off-by: Malaya Kumar Rout
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 9 ++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Why have you ignored this request I
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:19:22PM -0700, Shyam Saini wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > On 2/27/25 19:49, Shyam Saini wrote:
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > This patch series fixes handling of module_kobject creation.
> > > A driver expect module_kset list populated with its corresponding
> > > module_kobje
Hi Greg,
> On 2/27/25 19:49, Shyam Saini wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > This patch series fixes handling of module_kobject creation.
> > A driver expect module_kset list populated with its corresponding
> > module_kobject to create its /sys/module//drivers
> > directory.
> >
> > Since,
> > [1]
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:18:26 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 02/04/2025 19:23, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > Recent change [0] resulted in a "BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in
> > preemptible" splat [1]. PREEMPT kernels have additional requirements
> > on what can and can not run with/without preemp
There are a number of architectures with shadow stack features which we are
presenting to userspace with as consistent an API as we can (though there
are some architecture specifics). Especially given that there are some
important considerations for userspace code interacting directly with the
feat
Unlike with the normal stack there is no API for configuring the shadow
stack for a new thread, instead the kernel will dynamically allocate a
new shadow stack with the same size as the normal stack. This appears to
be due to the shadow stack series having been in development since
before the more
The clone_args structure is extensible, with the syscall passing in the
length of the structure. Inside the kernel we use copy_struct_from_user()
to read the struct but this has the unfortunate side effect of silently
accepting some overrun in the structure size providing the extra data is
all zero
Exception branch returns without closing
the file descriptors 'file_fd' and 'fd'
Signed-off-by: Malaya Kumar Rout
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/la
Add basic test coverage for specifying the shadow stack for a newly
created thread via clone3(), including coverage of the newly extended
argument structure. We check that a user specified shadow stack can be
provided, and that invalid combinations of parameters are rejected.
In order to facilita
The kernel has recently added support for shadow stacks, currently
x86 only using their CET feature but both arm64 and RISC-V have
equivalent features (GCS and Zicfiss respectively), I am actively
working on GCS[1]. With shadow stacks the hardware maintains an
additional stack containing only the
Static Analyis for bench_htab_mem.c with cppcheck:error
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_htab_mem.c:284:3:
error: Resource leak: fd [resourceLeak]
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_assign.c:41:3:
error: Resource leak: tc [resourceLeak]
fix the issue by closing the file descriptor
> -Original Message-
> From: Gon Solo
> It's a known problem:
> https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/issues/2003
> https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/118761#issuecomment-2661504264
>
For what it's worth, I've always been a bit skeptical of the use of the python
git mo
Add doorbell test case.
Signed-off-by: Frank Li
---
change from v14 to v16
- Add set IRQ type
change from v13 to v14
- merge to selftests framework
---
.../selftests/pci_endpoint/pci_endpoint_test.c | 28 ++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/se
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 05:34:20PM +, Bird, Tim wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gon Solo
> > It's a known problem:
> > https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/issues/2003
> > https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/118761#issuecomment-2661504264
> >
>
> For what it
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 08:26:33PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> The parent commit fixes an issue around these counters where one of them
> -- MPJoinAckHMacFailure -- was wrongly incremented in some cases.
>
> This makes sure the counter is always 0. It should be incremented only
> in cas
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 09:02, Peng Fan wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 10:32:39PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> >Hi Bjorn,
> >
> >
> >Thanks for replying this thread.
> >
> >On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:48:58AM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >>On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 09:43:55AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 08:26:32PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> Recently, during a debugging session using local MPTCP connections, I
> noticed MPJoinAckHMacFailure was not zero on the server side. The
> counter was in fact incremented when the PM rejected new subflows,
> because the 'sub
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:29:19PM -, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hello, Paul,
>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:23:32 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> > The torture.sh --do-rt command-line parameter is intended to mimic -rt
> > kernels. Now that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is upstream, this commit makes this
> >
On 4/8/25 4:45 AM, Cindy Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 12:06 AM Mike Christie
> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/7/25 3:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 06:02:48PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
Abstract vhost worker operations (create/stop/wakeup) into an ops
structure to prep
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 06:54:14AM +, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:40:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:06:32AM +, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 08:23 +, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 04
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 10:32:39PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>Hi Bjorn,
>
>
>Thanks for replying this thread.
>
>On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:48:58AM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 09:43:55AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:05:03AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wr
Hello, Paul,
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:23:32 GMT, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> The torture.sh --do-rt command-line parameter is intended to mimic -rt
> kernels. Now that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is upstream, this commit makes this
> mimicking more precise.
>
> Note that testing of RCU priority boosting is d
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:28:54 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> >> When napi_disable is called on an already disabled napi, it will sleep
> >> in napi_disable_locked while still holding the netdev_lock. As a result,
> >> later napi_enable gets stuck too as it cannot acquire the netdev_lock.
> >> This leads
On 4/8/2025 4:46 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 02:47, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
Hello Mathieu,
On 4/7/2025 7:17 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
Good morning,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 01:01:24PM +0300, Iuliana Prodan (OSS) wrote:
From: Iuliana Prodan
Some DSP firmware requires a F
Thank you Edward,
Em 04/04/2025 19:12, Edward Liaw escreveu:
Testcase should fail if -EWOULDBLOCK is not returned when expected value
differs from actual value from the waiter.
Fixes: 9d57f7c79748920636f8293d2f01192d702fe390 ("selftests: futex: Test
sys_futex_waitv() wouldblock")
Signed-off-by
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 02:47, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
>
> Hello Mathieu,
>
> On 4/7/2025 7:17 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Good morning,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 01:01:24PM +0300, Iuliana Prodan (OSS) wrote:
> >> From: Iuliana Prodan
> >>
> >> Some DSP firmware requires a FW_READY signal be
Christian Brauner writes:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 04:46:48PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>
>
> Fwiw, b4 allows to specify dependencies so you can b4 shazam/am and it
> will pull in all prerequisite patches:
>
> b4 prep --edit-deps Edit the series dependencies in your defined
>
On 4/8/25 9:34 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 10:27 AM Bui Quang Minh
> wrote:
>> On 4/7/25 08:03, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:39:03 +0700, Bui Quang Minh
>>> wrote:
When pausing rx (e.g. set up xdp, xsk pool, rx resize), we call
napi_disable() on the r
Add tests for memory mapping and NUMA memory policy binding in
guest_memfd. This extends the existing selftests by adding proper
validation for:
- Basic mmap() functionality
- KVM GMEM set_policy and get_policy() vm_ops functionality using
mbind() and get_mempolicy()
- NUMA policy application bef
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:18 AM Jon Kohler wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 6, 2025, at 7:14 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > !---|
> > CAUTION: External Email
> >
> > |---!
> >
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 08:16:51AM +, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Convert the selftest to nft as it is the replacement for iptables, which
> is used by default in most releases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu
What are the changes since v5, please?
Thanks, Phil
Syzkaller reported this issue [1].
The current sockmap has a dependency on sk_socket in both read and write
stages, but there is a possibility that sk->sk_socket is released during
the process, leading to panic situations. For a detailed reproduction,
please refer to the description in the v2:
htt
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 12:06 AM Mike Christie
wrote:
>
> On 4/7/25 3:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 06:02:48PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> >> Abstract vhost worker operations (create/stop/wakeup) into an ops
> >> structure to prepare for kthread mode support.
> >>
> >> S
KVM guest_memfd wants to implement support for NUMA policies just like
shmem already does using the shared policy infrastructure. As
guest_memfd currently resides in KVM module code, we have to export the
relevant symbols.
In the future, guest_memfd might be moved to core-mm, at which point the
sy
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 06:02:52PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> Introduce a new config knob `CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLE_FORK_OWNER_IOCTL`,
> to control the availability of the `VHOST_FORK_FROM_OWNER` ioctl.
> When CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLE_FORK_OWNER_IOCTL is set to n, the ioctl
> is disabled, and any attempt to us
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 02:14:42PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> The two primary goals of this series are to make the irqbypass concept
> easier to understand, and to address the terrible performance that can
> result from using a list to track connections.
>
> For the first goal, track the
Add device awake calls in case of rproc boot and rproc shutdown path.
Currently, device awake call is only present in the recovery path
of remoteproc. If an user stops and starts rproc by using the sysfs
interface, then on pm suspension the firmware fails to load as the
request_firmware call under
KVM's guest-memfd memory backend currently lacks support for NUMA policy
enforcement, causing guest memory allocations to be distributed arbitrarily
across host NUMA nodes regardless of the policy specified by the VMM. This
occurs because conventional userspace NUMA control mechanisms like mbind()
Add dedicated inode structure (kvm_gmem_inode_info) and slab-allocated
inode cache for guest memory backing, similar to how shmem handles inodes.
This adds the necessary allocation/destruction functions and prepares
for upcoming guest_memfd NUMA policy support changes.
Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg
Previously, guest-memfd allocations followed local NUMA node id in absence
of process mempolicy, resulting in arbitrary memory allocation.
Moreover, mbind() couldn't be used since memory wasn't mapped to userspace
in the VMM.
Enable NUMA policy support by implementing vm_ops for guest-memfd mmap
o
From: Ackerley Tng
Using guest mem inodes allows us to store metadata for the backing
memory on the inode. Metadata will be added in a later patch to support
HugeTLB pages.
Metadata about backing memory should not be stored on the file, since
the file represents a guest_memfd's binding with a st
From: Shivansh Dhiman
Add NUMA mempolicy support to the filemap allocation path by introducing
new APIs that take a mempolicy argument:
- filemap_grab_folio_mpol()
- filemap_alloc_folio_mpol()
- __filemap_get_folio_mpol()
These APIs allow callers to specify a NUMA policy during page cache
alloca
KVM guest_memfd is implementing its own inodes to store metadata for
backing memory using a custom filesystem. This requires the ability to
initialize anonymous inode using security_inode_init_security_anon().
As guest_memfd currently resides in the KVM module, we need to export this
symbol for us
It's a known problem:
https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/issues/2003
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/118761#issuecomment-2661504264
On 4/8/25 5:09 AM, zhenwei pi wrote:
> On 4/8/25 09:43, Geliang Tang wrote:
>> On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 16:51 +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
>>> mptcp_connect.c is a startup tutorial of MPTCP programming, however
>>> there is a lack of ai_protocol(IPPROTO_MPTCP) usage. Add comment for
>>> getaddrinfo MPTCP
On 19/03/2025 11:05 pm, Nico Pache wrote:
FW_CS_DSP gets enabled if KUNIT is enabled. The test should rather
depend on if the feature is enabled. Fix this by moving FW_CS_DSP to the
depends on clause, and set CONFIG_FW_CS_DSP=y in the kunit tooling.
Fixes: dd0b6b1f29b9 ("firmware: cs_dsp: Add KU
Add edge case tests for sockmap.
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/socket_helpers.h | 13 +++-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 60 +++
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/
> > checkpatch suddenly broke for me with the same error as shown here and the
> > patch fixed it.
> >
> > Tested-by: Duje Mihanović
Turns out, it was not enough; the variable is used later.
How about the following patch?
>From 763f25c8ca2e29f343bfd109a17501de71b38d43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 12:04 AM Mike Christie
wrote:
>
> On 3/28/25 5:02 AM, Cindy Lu wrote:
> > +static int vhost_kthread_worker_create(struct vhost_worker *worker,
> > +struct vhost_dev *dev, const char
> > *name)
> > +{
> > + struct task_struct *task;
>
On Fri, Apr 04 2025 at 22:12, Edward Liaw wrote:
> Testcase should fail if -EWOULDBLOCK is not returned when expected value
> differs from actual value from the waiter.
>
> Fixes: 9d57f7c79748920636f8293d2f01192d702fe390 ("selftests: futex: Test
> sys_futex_waitv() wouldblock")
> Signed-off-by: E
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:20 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 02:01:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > This patch introduces virtqueue ops which is a set of the callbacks
> > that will be called for different queue layout or features. This would
> > help to avoid branches for
Hello Mathieu,
On 4/7/2025 7:17 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
Good morning,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 01:01:24PM +0300, Iuliana Prodan (OSS) wrote:
From: Iuliana Prodan
Some DSP firmware requires a FW_READY signal before proceeding, while
others do not.
Therefore, add support to handle i.MX DSP-s
Hi Andrew,
On 07/04/25 19:15, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 3/17/25 7:06 AM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
The existing implementation of the waiting mechanism in
"k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init()" waits for the "released_from_reset" flag to
be set as part of the firmware boot process in "k3_r5_rproc_start()".
The
> checkpatch suddenly broke for me with the same error as shown here and the
> patch fixed it.
>
> Tested-by: Duje Mihanović
Same for me.
Tested-by: Andreas Wendleder
Hi Andrew,
On 07/04/25 19:13, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 3/17/25 7:06 AM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
The ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c driver previously hardcoded device memory
region addresses and names. Change this to use the k3_rproc_mem_data
structure to store memory information. This aligns with DSP and R5
This patch set convert the wireguard selftest to nftables, as iptables is
deparated and nftables is the default framework of most releases.
v6: fix typo in patch 1/2. Update the description (Phil Sutter)
v5: remove the counter in nft rules and link nft statically (Jason A. Donenfeld)
v4: no update
Convert the selftest to nft as it is the replacement for iptables, which
is used by default in most releases.
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu
---
tools/testing/selftests/wireguard/netns.sh | 29 ++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selft
On 4/7/2025 6:01 PM, Malaya Kumar Rout wrote:
> Static Analyis for bench_htab_mem.c with cppcheck:error
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_htab_mem.c:284:3:
> error: Resource leak: fd [resourceLeak]
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_assign.c:41:3:
> error: Resource leak: tc [re
On 07/04/25 19:03, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 3/17/25 7:05 AM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
Currently, struct members such as mem, num_mems, reset, tsp, ti_sci and
ti_sci_id are part of the k3_r5_core structure. To align the rproc->priv
data structure of the R5 remote processor with that of the DSP and M
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 04:46:48PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 07.04.25 16:24, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > * Nikita Kalyazin [250407 10:05]:
> > >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > >
> > > > All of this is extremely confusing because the onus of figuring out what
> > > > the final code will look l
On 07/04/25 18:59, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 3/17/25 7:05 AM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
The core's internal memory data structure will be refactored to be part
of the k3_r5_rproc structure in a future commit. As a result, internal
memory initialization will need to be performed inside
k3_r5_cluster_r
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 10:27 AM Bui Quang Minh wrote:
>
> On 4/7/25 08:03, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:39:03 +0700, Bui Quang Minh
> > wrote:
> >> When pausing rx (e.g. set up xdp, xsk pool, rx resize), we call
> >> napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi. In delayed refill_wo
* Malaya Kumar Rout wrote:
> Exception branch returns without closing
> the file descriptors 'file_fd' and 'fd'
>
> Signed-off-by: Malaya Kumar Rout
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 9 ++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/self
Hi,
On 08/04/2025 08:34, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Given:
> +#define OVPN_FAMILY_NAME "ovpn"
and
> ctx->ovpn_dco_id = genl_ctrl_resolve(ctx->nl_sock, OVPN_FAMILY_NAME);
Is there also an openvpn branch understanding the new (in-kernel)
naming? I.e. something like s/ovpn-dco-v2/ovpn/?
As with 2.
On 07. 04. 25, 21:46, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
Notable changes since v24:
* disable TCP disconnections of attached sockets (tcp_disconnect()
returns -EBUSY) - similarly to kTLS.
* used rcu_replace_pointer instead of
rcu_dereference_protected+rcu_assign_pointer
* dropped useless skb->ignore_df
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 11:53:40AM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> The virtio pci-iommu is a PCI device, so it should have a reference to
> the pci-device.yaml schema. The pci-device.yaml schema defines the 'reg'
> format as a schema, so the text description for 'reg' can be dropped.
>
> Signed-
The sk->sk_socket is not locked or referenced, and during the call to
skb_send_sock(), there is a race condition with the release of sk_socket.
All types of sockets(tcp/udp/unix/vsock) will be affected.
Race conditions:
'''
CPU0 CPU1
skb_send_sock
sendmsg_unlocked
91 matches
Mail list logo
