Currently, the second bridge command overwrites the first one.
Fix this by adding this VID to the interface behind $swp2.
The one_bridge_two_pvids() test intends to check that there is no
leakage of traffic between bridge ports which have a single VLAN - the
PVID VLAN.
Because of a typo, port $sw
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 04:51:32PM GMT, Wasim Nazir wrote:
> This test includes:
> 1) Start/stop test for each rproc instance sequencially
> 2) Start/stop test for all rproc instances concurrently
>
This fails to describe the purpose of the patch. Provide a proper commit
mesasge.
In part
From: Yaxiong Tian
To save some running memory,Add __init and __exit to the
module load/unload functions.
Signed-off-by: Yaxiong Tian
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftest
From: zhang jiao
If there were no anamolies noted, then we can
simply remove the log file and return.
Signed-off-by: zhang jiao
---
v1->v2:
Remove the path after initialization.
tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm/tlbie_test.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletio
Hi David,
On 9/25/24 08:26, David Laight wrote:
From: Vinicius Peixoto
Sent: 23 September 2024 00:27
Hi all,
This patch was developed during a hackathon organized by LKCAMP [1],
with the objective of writing KUnit tests, both to introduce people to
the kernel development process and to learn
Hi David,
On 9/26/24 13:21, David Laight wrote:
...
The checksums for the randomly-generated test cases were calculated
using a reference implementation [1] and this test compares them against
the values yielded by the kernel's implementation.
I'd just use a naïve implementation - doesn't rea
1:The control flow was simplified by using else if statements instead of
goto structure.
2:Error conditions are handled more clearly.
3:The device_unlock call at the end of the function is guaranteed in all
cases.
Github request : https://github.com/torvalds/linux/pull/967
// SPDX-License-Identi
From: s...@kernel.org
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 21:08:45 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Ba,
>
>
> Thank you for revising this patch following my comment.
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:14:26 +0800 Ba Jing
> wrote:
>
> > By reading the code, I found these variables are never
> > referenced in the code.
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock
> module.
>
> It is useful because it allows userspace to check if vhost_vsock is there
> when it is
> configured as a built-in.
>
> This is what we
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 7:48 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:35:35PM +0200, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 6:56 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 06:16:40PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > > Add an expl
Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock
module.
It is useful because it allows userspace to check if vhost_vsock is there when
it is
configured as a built-in.
This is what we have *without* this change and when vhost_vsock is configured
as a module and loaded:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:35:35PM +0200, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 6:56 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 06:16:40PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification
> > > for a vhost_vsock modu
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:35:35PM +0200, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 6:56 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 06:16:40PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification
> > > for a vhost_vsock modu
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 6:56 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 06:16:40PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification
> > for a vhost_vsock module. It is useful because it allows
> > userspace to check if vhost_vsock is there
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 12:09:54PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> On 2024-09-29 17:51, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:16:08AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > Refer to ptr_eq() in the rcu_dereference() documentation.
> > >
> > > ptr_eq() is a mechanism that preserve
The pull request you sent on Sat, 28 Sep 2024 11:52:08 -0600:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
> tags/linux_kselftest-next-6.12-rc1-fixes
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/e7ebdb5161bcb98cb27b7490459419e38dee5b9a
Than
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 06:16:40PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification
> for a vhost_vsock module. It is useful because it allows
> userspace to check if vhost_vsock is there when it is
> configured as a built-in.
>
> Without this change, the
On 2024-09-29 17:51, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:16:08AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Refer to ptr_eq() in the rcu_dereference() documentation.
ptr_eq() is a mechanism that preserves address dependencies when
comparing pointers, and should be favored when comparing a p
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:16:08AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Refer to ptr_eq() in the rcu_dereference() documentation.
>
> ptr_eq() is a mechanism that preserves address dependencies when
> comparing pointers, and should be favored when comparing a pointer
> obtained from rcu_dereference()
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:16:06AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Introduce ptr_eq() to compare two addresses while preserving the address
> dependencies for later use of the address. It should be used when
> comparing an address returned by rcu_dereference().
Both patches are now much better.
Hi, Miroslav!
> On Sep 27, 2024, at 22:11, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>
>
> How do you prepare your patches?
>
> "---" delimiter is missing here.
I seem to found out what cause this problem.
I seemed to use 'git format-patch' with '-p' option which
will make my patch have no diff state.
Sorry f
Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute which holds the order in which a live
patch module was loaded into the system. A user can then determine an
active live patched version of a function.
cat /sys/kernel/livepatch/livepatch_1/stack_order -> 1
means that livepatch_1 is the first live patch applied
c
As previous discussion, maintainers think that patch-level sysfs interface is
the
only acceptable way to maintain the information of the order that klp_patch is
applied to the system.
However, the previous patch introduce klp_ops into klp_func is a optimization
methods of the patch introducing
Refer to ptr_eq() in the rcu_dereference() documentation.
ptr_eq() is a mechanism that preserves address dependencies when
comparing pointers, and should be favored when comparing a pointer
obtained from rcu_dereference() against another pointer.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers
Cc: Greg Kroah-H
Compiler CSE and SSA GVN optimizations can cause the address dependency
of addresses returned by rcu_dereference to be lost when comparing those
pointers with either constants or previously loaded pointers.
Introduce ptr_eq() to compare two addresses while preserving the address
dependencies for l
Introduce ptr_eq() to compare two addresses while preserving the address
dependencies for later use of the address. It should be used when
comparing an address returned by rcu_dereference().
Thanks,
Mathieu
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney"
Cc: Will D
Use vmalloc_array() instead of vmalloc() to calculate the number of
bytes to allocate.
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
index 9ace844
On 2024-09-29 01:24, Gary Guo wrote:
Cc: Nikita Popov
Cc: l...@lists.linux.dev
On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 09:51:27 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Compiler CSE and SSA GVN optimizations can cause the address dependency
of addresses returned by rcu_dereference to be lost when comparing those
pointers
Use of macro ARRAY_SIZE to calculate array size minimizes
the redundant code and improves code reusability.
./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc_raw.c:98:34-35: WARNING:
Use ARRAY_SIZE.
./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc_raw.c:93:29-30: WARNING:
Use ARRAY_SIZE.
./
The HID test cases actually run tests using the run-hid-tools-tests.sh
script. However, if installed with "make install", the run-hid-tools-tests.sh
script will not be copied over, resulting in the following error message.
make -C tools/testing/selftests/ TARGETS=hid install \
INSTALL_
On 2024/9/27 20:20, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 08:12:20PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
Perhaps calling it a slice sounds more accurate, as I guess all
the confusion comes from the name "vIOMMU" that might be thought
to be a user space object/instance that likely holds all virtual
stu
On 2024/9/28 04:44, Nicolin Chen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 08:12:20PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
On 2024/9/27 14:32, Nicolin Chen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 01:54:45PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
Baolu told me that Intel may have the same: different domain IDs
on different IOMMUs; multiple IOMMU i
32 matches
Mail list logo
