On 06/30, Huacai Chen wrote:
>
> > +static __init int check_emit_break(void)
> > +{
> > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_SWBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_BP));
> > + BUG_ON(UPROBE_XOLBP_INSN != larch_insn_gen_break(BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +arch_initcall(check_em
Hi Alice
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 9:24 PM Alice Ryhl wrote:
>
> Add just enough support for static key so that we can use it from
> tracepoints. Tracepoints rely on `static_key_false` even though it is
> deprecated, so we add the same functionality to Rust.
>
> It is not possible to use the existi
Hi, Oleg,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 11:05 PM Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks
> arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable.
>
> Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine
> the cur
LoongArch defines UPROBE_SWBP_INSN as a function call and this breaks
arch_uprobe_trampoline() which uses it to initialize a static variable.
Add the new "__builtin_constant_p" helper, __emit_break(), and redefine
the current users of larch_insn_gen_break() to use it.
The patch adds check_emit_br
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 9:40 PM Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 06/29, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200
> > Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever.
> > >
>
On 06/29, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever.
> >
> > Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test
> > thi
On 27.06.2024 3:15 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Without explicitly specifying names for the regulators they are named
> based on the DeviceTree node name. This results in multiple regulators
> with the same name, making debug prints and regulator_summary impossible
> to reason about.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On 29.06.2024 11:01 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 27. Juni 2024 21:30:52 MESZ Raymond Hackley wrote:
>> Samsung Galaxy Grand 2 is a phone based on MSM8226. It's similar to the
>> other Samsung devices based on MSM8226 with only a few minor differences.
>>
>> The device trees contain initia
On 27.06.2024 12:48 PM, Sudeepgoud Patil wrote:
> From: Chris Lew
>
> When using /proc/interrupts to collect statistics on smp2p interrupt
> counts, it is hard to distinguish the different instances of smp2p from
> each other. For example to debug a processor boot issue, the ready and
> handover
On 28.06.2024 7:30 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Since the smsm driver got the ability to interact with the mailbox using
> the mailbox subsystem and not just syscon, we need to add the dependency
> to kconfig as well to avoid compile errors.
>
> Fixes: 75287992f58a ("soc: qcom: smsm: Support using mail
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:38:06 +0200
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
...
> > > +arch_initcall(check_emit_break);
> > > +
> >
> > I wouldn't even bother with this, but whatever.
>
> Agreed, this looks a bit ugly. I did this only because I can not test
> this (hopefully trivial) patch and the maintainers didn
On Donnerstag, 27. Juni 2024 21:30:52 MESZ Raymond Hackley wrote:
> Samsung Galaxy Grand 2 is a phone based on MSM8226. It's similar to the
> other Samsung devices based on MSM8226 with only a few minor differences.
>
> The device trees contain initial support with:
> - GPIO keys
> - Regulator h
12 matches
Mail list logo
