Re: [PATCH v3] dax/kmem: Pass valid argument to memory_group_register_static

Hi, This is just a gentle reminder, If any other information is needed. Tarun Sahu writes: > memory_group_register_static takes maximum number of pages as the argument > while dev_dax_kmem_probe passes total_len (in bytes) as the argument. > > IIUC, I don't see any crash/panic impact as such.

RE: [PATCH v5 09/10] acpi/nfit: Move handler installing logic to driver

Michal Wilczynski wrote: > Currently logic for installing notifications from ACPI devices is > implemented using notify callback in struct acpi_driver. Preparations > are being made to replace acpi_driver with more generic struct > platform_driver, which doesn't contain notify callback. Furthermore

RE: [PATCH v5 08/10] acpi/nfit: Improve terminator line in acpi_nfit_ids

Michal Wilczynski wrote: > Currently terminator line contains redunant characters. Remove them and > also remove a comma at the end. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski > --- > drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/c

Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] acpi/nfit: Move handler installing logic to driver

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:51 PM Michal Wilczynski wrote: > > Currently logic for installing notifications from ACPI devices is > implemented using notify callback in struct acpi_driver. Preparations > are being made to replace acpi_driver with more generic struct > platform_driver, which doesn't c

Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] acpi/nfit: Improve terminator line in acpi_nfit_ids

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:51 PM Michal Wilczynski wrote: > > Currently terminator line contains redunant characters. Well, they are terminating the list properly AFAICS, so they aren't redundant and the size of it before and after the change is actually the same, isn't it? > Remove them and also

Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] acpi/nfit: Move acpi_nfit_notify() before acpi_nfit_add()

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:51 PM Michal Wilczynski wrote: > > To use new style of installing event handlers acpi_nfit_notify() needs > to be known inside acpi_nfit_add(). Move acpi_nfit_notify() upwards in > the file, so it can be used inside acpi_nfit_add(). > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski >

Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] acpi/battery: Move handler installing logic to driver

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:51 PM Michal Wilczynski wrote: > > Currently logic for installing notifications from ACPI devices is > implemented using notify callback in struct acpi_driver. Preparations > are being made to replace acpi_driver with more generic struct > platform_driver, which doesn't c

Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] acpi/video: Move handler installing logic to driver

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:51 PM Michal Wilczynski wrote: > > Currently logic for installing notifications from ACPI devices is > implemented using notify callback in struct acpi_driver. Preparations > are being made to replace acpi_driver with more generic struct > platform_driver, which doesn't c

Re: [PATCH v5 03/10] acpi/ac: Move handler installing logic to driver

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:51 PM Michal Wilczynski wrote: > > Currently logic for installing notifications from ACPI devices is > implemented using notify callback in struct acpi_driver. Preparations > are being made to replace acpi_driver with more generic struct > platform_driver, which doesn't c