On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 06:50:59PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> The address of a data structure member was determined before
> >> a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
> >> the function “nd_pfn_validate”.
> >>
> >> Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by replacing
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 12:12:37PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:01:15 +0200
>
> The address of a data structure member was determined before
> a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
> the function “nd_pfn_validate”.
>
> Thus avoid the risk for unde
>> The address of a data structure member was determined before
>> a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
>> the function “nd_pfn_validate”.
>>
>> Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by replacing the usage of
>> the local variable “parent_uuid” by a direct function call
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 12:12:37PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:01:15 +0200
>
> The address of a data structure member was determined before
> a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
> the function “nd_pfn_validate”.
>
> Thus avoid the risk for unde
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:01:15 +0200
The address of a data structure member was determined before
a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
the function “nd_pfn_validate”.
Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by replacing the usage of
the local variable “parent_uuid” by
5 matches
Mail list logo