Jeremy Higdon wrote:
[]
> I'll put it even more strongly. My experience is that disabling write
> cache plus disabling barriers is often much faster than enabling both
> barriers and write cache enabled, when doing metadata intensive
> operations, as long as you have a drive that is good at CTQ/NC
Li Zefan 写道:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> A new configuration file called soft_limit_in_bytes is added. The parsing
>> and configuration rules remain the same as for the limit_in_bytes user
>> interface.
>>
>> A global list of all memory cgroups over their soft limit is maintained.
>> This list is then
Zhang, Yanmin a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 12:33 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800, "Zhang, Yanmin" said:
I also think __refcnt is the key. I did a new testing by adding 2 unsigned long
pading before lastuse, so the 3 members are moved to next cache line. Th
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:46:03AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 16:13 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:01:35PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This means it generates faster code with a
Hi Yanmin,
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 08:42 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Kernel panic at line 1637 in file mm/slub.c because
> > > object=c->freelist=NULL.
> >
> > H. freelist should never be NULL. Could you rerun the test and boot with
> > slub_debug to make sure that there is no memor
Hi Paul,
Thank you for wonderful interestings comment.
your comment is really nice.
I was HPC guy with large NUMA box at past.
I promise i don't ignroe hpc user.
but unfortunately I didn't have experience of use CPUSET
because at that point, it was under development yet.
I hope discuss you that
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source. There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log files
in the Next directory. Between each
Zhang, Yanmin a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:11 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800
"Zhang, Yanmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 15:22 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:21:48 +0100
On
Balbir Singh wrote:
> A new configuration file called soft_limit_in_bytes is added. The parsing
> and configuration rules remain the same as for the limit_in_bytes user
> interface.
>
> A global list of all memory cgroups over their soft limit is maintained.
> This list is then used to reclaim mem
* Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +#endif
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_LGUEST) || defined(CONFIG_LGUEST_MODULE)
> + BLANK();
hm. Rusty's original fix is now upstream. I've done a delta to your
patch, find the fix is below.
Ingo
->
Subject: lguest: fix build b
On Feb 19, 2008 8:54 AM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [ 5282.056415] [ cut here ]
> > > [ 5282.059757] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:33!
> > > [ 5282.062055] invalid opcode: [1] SMP
> > > [ 5282.062055] CPU 3
> >
> > hm. Your crashes do seem to span
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:16:44AM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:24:27PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > First, I still don't understand why in God's sake barriers are "working"
> > while regular cache flushes are not. Almost no consumer-grade hard drive
> > supports w
Hi Nick,
> Yeah this is definitely needed and a nice result.
>
> I'm worried about a) placing a global limit on parallelism, and b)
> placing a limit on parallelism at all.
sorry, i don't understand yet.
a) and b) have any relation?
>
> I think it should maybe be a per-zone thing...
>
> What
Add documentation for the soft limit feature.
Changelog v2 (Thanks to the review by Randy Dunlap)
1. Change several misuses of it's to its
2. Fix spelling errors and punctuation
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/controllers/memory.txt | 18 +-
Changelog v2
1. Take reference on mem->css in pushback (YAMAMOTO Takshi)
2. Move away from trying to reclaim nr_pages over soft limit to swap
cluster at a time (KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki)
The global list of all cgroups over their soft limit is scanned under
memory pressure. We call mem_cgroup_pushba
A new configuration file called soft_limit_in_bytes is added. The parsing
and configuration rules remain the same as for the limit_in_bytes user
interface.
A global list of all memory cgroups over their soft limit is maintained.
This list is then used to reclaim memory on global pressure. A cgrou
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 08:42 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>
> > On my 16-core tigerton, kernel panic when I ran hackbench process testing.
> > See
> > below log.
> >
>
> > Kernel panic at line 1637 in file mm/slub.c because object=c->freelist=NULL.
Changelog v2
1. Remove memory controller specific comments from resource counters
The resource counter member limit is split into soft and hard limits.
The same locking rule apply for both limits.
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/res_counter.h | 32
This patchset implements the basic changes required to implement soft limits
in the memory controller. A soft limit is a variation of the currently
supported hard limit feature. A memory cgroup can exceed it's soft limit
provided there is no contention for memory.
These patches were tested on a Po
Hello,
I have just upgraded from 2.6.22 to 2.6.24.2 and after booting into the
new kernel and seeing that everything went right, I wanted to make the
new kernel the default boot kernel. But running LILO I got
Fatal: Linux experimental device 0x04x needs to be defined.
Check 'man lilo.conf'
On Feb 19, 2008 7:11 AM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 15, 2008 10:23 PM, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok,
> > > this kernel is a winner.
> >
> > Sadly not for me:
> > [ 5282.056415] [ cut here ]
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 12:33 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800, "Zhang, Yanmin" said:
>
> > I also think __refcnt is the key. I did a new testing by adding 2 unsigned
> > long
> > pading before lastuse, so the 3 members are moved to next cache line. The
> > per
On Feb 19, 2008 12:54 AM, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > [ 5282.056415] [ cut here ]
> > [ 5282.059757] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:33!
>
> Is there any chance that you could try to bisect this, if it's r
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 10:03, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> [ description ]
>
> Subject: kthread: add a memory barrier to kthread_stop()
>
> 'kthread' threads do a check in the following order:
> - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> - kthread_should_stop();
>
> and set_current_stat
Commit:
02c9b5cf9acd8a85313b892dc5196ccf133d4884 serial: add ADDI-DATA GmbH
Communication cardsin8250_pci.c and pci_ids.h
Added a second initializer, perhaps sopmething else was intended?
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/serial/8250_pci.c |7 ---
1 files ch
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 16:58, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:33:53PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > Note in particular the last predictors; assuming branch ending
> > > with goto, including call, causing early function return or
> > > returning negative constant are not tak
fixes sparse warning:
drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c:3391:3: warning: Initializer entry
defined twice
drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c:3392:3: also defined here
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c |1 -
1 files chan
* Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2008 10:23 PM, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ok,
> > this kernel is a winner.
>
> Sadly not for me:
> [ 5282.056415] [ cut here ]
> [ 5282.059757] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:33!
> [ 5282.062
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 10:55 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This is my current queue for single RQ group scheduling.
I took these out for a brief maxcpus=1 spin yesterday, and noticed
something. Running 4 copies of chew-max, one as a user, the context
switch rate was high (~1800/s). I increased
David wrote:
> So what is the MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES behavior? Is it a combination of
> nodes_onto() and nodes_fold()?
MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES should always combination of nodes_onto() and
nodes_fold().
The reason I say that is consistency with the end cases. That is,
we need fold in the case tha
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 01:40 +0800, Дамјан Георгиевски wrote:
> I've patched my kernel with the PCIe ASPM and after setting
> echo powersave > /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy
>
> I started to experience random hangs of my laptop.
> Hardware info:
> Thinkpad x60s 1704-5UG
> also tested on a
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:33:53PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Note in particular the last predictors; assuming branch ending
> > with goto, including call, causing early function return or
> > returning negative constant are not taken. Just these alone
> > are likely 95+% of the unlikelies in th
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2008, Stefan Bader wrote:
> > Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:24:01PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On Saturday 16 February 2008, Borislav Pe
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:50:12 +0100
Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:50:01 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > > The patch "[RTNETLINK]: Send a single notification on device state
>
Hi,
Don't you remember the topic "solid state drive access and context
switching" [1].
I want to measure it is really better performance on SSD?
To write it on ssd synchronously, I hacked the
'generic_make_request()' [2] and got following results.
# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
# tiotest -f
background
current VM implementation doesn't has limit of # of parallel reclaim.
when heavy workload, it bring to 2 bad things
- heavy lock contention
- unnecessary swap out
abount 2 month ago, KAMEZA Hiroyuki proposed the patch of page
reclaim thrott
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 02:51 +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 11:55:06AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch
> titled
> > >
> > > Subject: PCI: PCIE ASPM support
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:56:43AM +, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:16:44AM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> > Surely any hardware that doesn't support barrier
> > operations can emulate them with cache flushes when they receive a
> > barrier I/O from the filesystem
>
> >
> > It is a consistencycheck between host and target
> > layout of data.
> > You need to pad the structure so it becomes 8 byte in size.
>
> Ok, I looked at the code and it is hightly questionable to me that this
> check does work in a crosscompile environment (which the ARM build
> most like
From: Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch assumes "Smack unlabeled outgoing ambient packets - v4"
which is one reason it's RFC.
Update the Smack LSM to allow the registration of the capability
"module" as a secondary LSM. Integrate the new hooks required for
file based capabilities.
On Feb 18, 2008 5:01 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 19 February 2008 00:42:12 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:17:04AM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 19 February 2008 00:00:58 Russell King wrote:
> > > > > > Why can't we have an array o
From: Laszlo Attila Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:03:47 +0100
> Hello,
>
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 18 of February 2008, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
> >
> >
> > All in all, I gather you wanted me to test the patch below. :-)
> >
> > Yes, that helps.
>
> Thanks
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 13:40, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:33:53 +1100
>
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually one thing I don't like about gcc is that I think it still
> > emits cmovs for likely/unlikely branches, which is silly (the gcc
> > developers seem
From: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:58:05 +0800
> hci conn child devices other than rfcomm tty should not be moved here.
> This is my lost, thanks for Barnaby's reporting and testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, thanks Dave.
--
To unsubs
From: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:55:55 +0800
> Move hci_dev_put to del_conn to avoid hci dev going away before hci conn.
This looks correct so I have applied it.
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please remove the extraneous space at the end of your
Consolidate all address space manipulation code in libfs in a single
source file.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/fs/libfs.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/libfs.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,116 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *
Consolidate all inode manipulation code in libfs in a single
source file.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/fs/libfs.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/libfs.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/libfs.c
@@ -12,78 +12,6 @@
#i
With most of debugfs now copied to generic code in libfs,
we can remove the original copy and replace it with thin
wrappers around libfs.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/fs/Kconfig
===
--- linux-2.6.o
Consolidate all file manipulation code in libfs in a single
source file.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/fs/libfs.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/libfs.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/libfs.c
@@ -421,165 +421,6 @@ ssi
I noticed that there is a lot of duplication in pseudo
file systems, so I started looking into how to consolidate
them. I ended up with a largish rework of the structure
of libfs and moving almost all of debugfs in there as well.
As an example, I also have patches that reduce debugfs,
securityfs a
Consolidate all dentry manipulation code in libfs in a single
source file.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/fs/libfs.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/libfs.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/libfs.c
@@ -12,188 +12,6 @@
The file operations in debugfs are rather generic and can
be used by other file systems, so it can be interesting to
include them in libfs, with more generic names, and exported
to modules.
This patch adds a new copy of these operations to libfs,
so that the debugfs version can later be cut down.
Half of the usbfs code is the same as debugfs, so we can
replace it now with calls to the generic libfs versions.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/usb/core/inode.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/driver
Consolidate all super block manipulation code in libfs in a single
source file.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/fs/libfs.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/libfs.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/libfs.c
@@ -12,63 +12,6 @@
With the new simple_fs_type in place, securityfs practically
becomes a nop and we just need to leave code around to manage
its mount point.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/security/inode.c
===
--- lin
With libfs turning into a larger subsystem, it makes
sense to have a separate header that is not included
by the low-level vfs code.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/fs/debugfs/inode.c
===
--- linux-2.
There is a number of pseudo file systems in the kernel
that are basically copies of debugfs, all implementing the
same boilerplate code, just with different bugs.
This adds yet another copy to the kernel in the libfs directory,
with generalized helpers that can be used by any of them.
The most in
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 09:27, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:04:30PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > [ 4057.31] Pid: 7035, comm: ftest03 Not tainted
> > > 2.6.24-25f666300625d894ebe04bac2b4b3aadb907c861 #2 [ 4057.31] RIP:
> > > 0010:[] []
> > > iov_iter_advan
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, john stultz wrote:
> If we are building a train station, and each train car is 60ft, it
> doesn't make much sense to build 1000ft stations, right? Instead you'll
> do better if you build a 1020ft station.
That would assume trains are always 60ft long, which is the basic
On Feb 15, 2008 1:31 AM, Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> so even booting kernel with acpi=off or even MCFG is not there, we still can
> use MMCONFIG.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: In
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 07:11:10AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Lguest guest support and host support are separate config options: they used
> to be tied together. Sort out which parts of asm-offsets are needed for Guest
> and Host.
With rusty's patch applied the errors still persist in some
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Should we ignore this issue and submit the patches anyway?
>
> I think you should. "Easy" (and clean) solution to that issue is to
> just return -EPERM from SG_IOCTL if autosuspend is configured in ;-).
:-)
Okay, I'll update the patches to 2.6.25-rc2
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 08:52 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:59:18 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:47:01 +0800 "Zhang, Yanmin"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [] ? __alloc_skb+0x31/0x121
> > > [] ? s
Hi Darrick:
* Darrick J. Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 13:33:23 -0800]:
> adt7473: New driver for Analog Devices ADT7473 sensor chip
>
> This driver reports voltage, temperature and fan sensor readings
> on an ADT7473 chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:16:44AM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> Surely any hardware that doesn't support barrier
> operations can emulate them with cache flushes when they receive a
> barrier I/O from the filesystem
My complaint about having to support them within dm when more than one
devic
This patch removes goto statements in favour of plain returns
in places that had nothing left behind that would justify
such construction
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/proce
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:11 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800
> "Zhang, Yanmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 15:22 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:21:48 +0100
> > >
> >
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:52:10AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> I understand that. Most of the time, dm or md devices are composed of
> uniform components which will uniformly support (or not) the cache flush
> commands used by barriers.
As a dm developer, it's "almost none of the time" because
Greetings -
A couple months back I purchased a LSI Logic MegaRAID ATA 150-4
controller, as well as 3 Seagate 500GB SATA-II hard drives to use in my
system. Previously, I was using a pair of WD4000YR's in software raid,
which seemed to work well. I've just not gotten around to working on
migra
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:33:53 +1100
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually one thing I don't like about gcc is that I think it still
> emits cmovs for likely/unlikely branches, which is silly (the gcc
> developers seem to be in love with that instruction). If that goes
> away, then bra
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:07:54PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:08:21PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> Implement barrier support for single device DM devices
> > Thanks. We've got some (more-invasive) dm patches in the works that
> > attemp
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 01:39, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > you have more faith in the authors knowledge of how his code actually
> > behaves than I think is warranted :)
>
> iirc there was a mm patch some time ago to keep track of the actual
> unlikely
The similar check has been added to x86_32(i386) in commit
id 83bd01024b1fdfc41d9b758e5669e80fca72df66.
So we add this check to ia64_ia32 and improve it a liitle bit in that
we need to check for stack overflow only when the signal is on stack.
Signed-off-by: Shi Weihua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
T
The similar check has been added to x86_32(i386) in commit
id 83bd01024b1fdfc41d9b758e5669e80fca72df66.
So we add this check to ia64 and improve it a liitle bit in that
we need to check for stack overflow only when the signal is on stack.
Signed-off-by: Shi Weihua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
The pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew
Here is the patch to add per-process securebits again. This version
includes Serge's argument type fix (thanks), but is otherwise unchanged
from the one posted a couple of weeks back. It is against Linus' tree as
of a the 15th.
This change is
The similar check has been added to x86_32(i386) in commit
id 83bd01024b1fdfc41d9b758e5669e80fca72df66.
So we add this check to x86_ia32 and improve it a liitle bit in that
we need to check for stack overflow only when the signal is on stack.
Signed-off-by: Shi Weihua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Th
Glauber Costa wrote:
> Li Zefan wrote:
>> Glauber Costa 写道:
>>> This patch removes goto statements in favour of plain returns
>>> in places that had nothing left behind that would justify
>>> such construction
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |4 ++--
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions
The similar check has been added to x86_32(i386) in commit
id 83bd01024b1fdfc41d9b758e5669e80fca72df66.
So we add this check to x86_64 and improve it a liitle bit in that
we need to check for stack overflow only when the signal is on stack.
Signed-off-by: Shi Weihua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
The
We need to check for stack overflow only when the signal is on stack.
So we can improve the patch "http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/27/101"; as following.
Signed-off-by: Shi Weihua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
The previous patch has a comment mistake. Now I correct it.
---
--- linux-2.6.25-rc2.orig/ar
Li Zefan wrote:
> Glauber Costa 写道:
>> This patch removes goto statements in favour of plain returns
>> in places that had nothing left behind that would justify
>> such construction
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff
On Monday 18 February 2008, Jan Altenberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> commit 0cf4f2de0a0f4100795f38ef894d4910678c74f8 introduced a bug, which
> prevents sending an USB_CDC_GET_ENCAPSULATED_RESPONSE message. This
> breaks the RNDIS initialization (especially / only Windoze machines
> dislike this behavior
(resending this as i have got no reply in the last week)
Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi,
This patch fix bugzilla #9027.
``Syslog flooded with "hci_scodata_packet: hci0 SCO packet for unknown
connection handle 92" message"
see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9027
>>
On Monday 18 February 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Move sample source code to its own source file so that it can be used
> easier and build-tested/check/maintained by anyone.
>
> (Makefile changes are in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote::
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:22:05 +0800, Shi Weihua said:
>
>> -/*
>> - * If we are on the alternate signal stack and would overflow it, don't.
>notice
> this ^
>> - * Return an always-bogus a
Matthew Wilcox wrote::
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 06:26:23PM +0800, Shi Weihua wrote:
>> +if (!rbs_on_sig_stack(scr->pt.ar_bspstore))
>> +new_rbs = (current->sas_ss_sp +
>> + sizeof(long) - 1) & ~(sizeof(long) -
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:37:37PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> # CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is not set
IMHO That should be *set* by default until everyone has had time to
update their userspace software to cope with the changed sysfs layout.
Alasdair
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:33:17PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > and that scrapping the remote
> > softirq trigger stuff is sanest.
>
> I actually liked Nick's queued smp_function_call_single() patch. So even
> if it was not used for block I would still l
Glauber Costa 写道:
> This patch removes goto statements in favour of plain returns
> in places that had nothing left behind that would justify
> such construction
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pro
Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>>> I don't think I've seen anyone else report this, but if I'm wrong, I'm
>>> sure someone will point me to the thread.
>> No, I think it's new.
>>
>
>> Looks like an ftrace-vs-lockdep problem.
>>
>
> Is there a .config arou
Global vaiables should be defined in C files, not in headers.
1) Comment out unused vars
GlobalDnotifyRsp_Q
GlobalUidList
2) Declare vars in cifsfs.c that need it and change to extern in
cifsglob.h
3) Change to extern in cifsglob.h for vars that were already being
declared in cifsfs.c
4) Remove
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 16:35 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> One consequence of Herbert's change is that the chip will see a
> different datastream. The initial skb->data linear area will be
> smaller, and the transition to the fragmented area of pages will be
> quicker.
>
I see. Perhaps when we g
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 05:24 +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, john stultz wrote:
>
> > Oh! So your issue is that since time_freq is stored in ppm, or in effect
> > a usecs per sec offset, when we add it to something other then 1 second
> > we mis-apply what NTP tells us t
Ingo Molnar wrote::
> * Shi Weihua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> We need to check for stack overflow only when the signal is on stack.
>> So we can improve the patch "http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/27/101"; as
>> following.
>
> hm, does this address Roland's observations at:
>
>http://lk
Change sysfs_remove_bin_file() to have a return value of void in the
!CONFIG_SYSFS case, matching the return value of the same function with
the opposite configuration.
Also moves unnecessary ';' in empty void functions.
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <[EMAIL
Hi,
This update fixes all known/open 2.6.25 IDE regressions + few other things:
- fix ide-cd cd/dvd burning regression (Kiyoshi Ueda)
- fix falconide/macide regressions (Geert Uytterhoeven)
- another device needs HPA workaround (Mikko Rapeli)
- ht6560b bugfixes (Jan Evert van Grootheest)
- n
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:37:48 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:20:41PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:58:27PM -0500, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> > > > Hi Andreas,
> > > >
> > > > On Sat
On Monday 18 February 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:08:41 +1100
>
> > I have created today's linux-next tree at
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>
> The patch below fixes the allmodconfig bui
On Monday 18 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The next-20080218 kernel build fails on the powerpc(s)
>
> drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c: In function ‘pmac_ide_macio_attach’:
> drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c:1094: error: conversion to non-scalar type requested
> drive
On Monday 18 February 2008, Stefan Bader wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:24:01PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Saturday 16 February 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:53:27PM -0500, Stefan Bader wrote:
>
David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:18:58AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> 5 days ago I pulled the git tree (HEAD was
>> 25f666300625d894ebe04bac2b4b3aadb907c861), added two minor patches
>> (the vmsplice fix and the GFS1 exports), compiled and booted the
>> k
1 - 100 of 592 matches
Mail list logo
