>From ad5409f51b70b12575a8b0dc07c897395311d13b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:44:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 11/14] kbuild: add support for reading stdin with gen_init_cpio
Treat an argument of "-" as meaning "read stdin for cpio files" so
>From 61f24a916b640ae1ac5f7bc783d3bb4d7d833c00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:59:29 +1000
Subject: [PATCH 10/14] powerpc: Fix the MODALIAS generation in modpost for of
devices
Since the devices may have multiple (or none) compatible prop
>From 8727055cf189053a0605919611cec5f3c725dc82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:48:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] mm/slab: fix section mismatch warning
Use the new __init_refok marker to avoid the
section mismatch warning from slab.c
Signe
On May 18 2007 08:49, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>index 113dc77..acd28ab 100644
>--- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
>+++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
>@@ -885,29 +885,28 @@ static void warn_sec_mismatch(const char *modname, const
>char *fromsec,
> return;
>
> if (before && after) {
>-
>From 2f92cdcf9de22b1a18885919b323793f89a6ff94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:43:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 07/14] init/main: use __init_refok to fix section mismatch
Kill a special case in modpost by introducing the
__init_refok marker.
Si
>From 90deffab03386508abfa1529fe4926a2fc7300f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:29:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 08/14] mm: fix section mismatch warnings
modpost had two cases hardcoded for mm/
Shift over to __init_refok and kill the
hardcoded fu
>From 653bc43c6c2c292e6abc98860fd241eb12e2c80f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:38:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 05/14] all-archs: consolidate .data section definition in
asm-generic
With this consolidation we can now modify the .data
section de
>From 9ea9840b8258e81ea88548bc22b2cb2871e2b1c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:14:48 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 06/14] kbuild: introduce __init_refok/__initdata_refok to
supress section mismatch warnings
Throughout the kernel there are a few le
>From abe82ff8e73db114634b38ef1cd24e121643a2e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 00:31:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] all-archs: consolidate .text section definition in
asm-generic
Move definition of .text section to asm-generic.
Signed-off-b
>From bdfeed222963cadd30cbfcad799c89f3a7b94e02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:04:28 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] kbuild: add "Section mismatch" warning whitelist for
powerpc
This patch fixes the following class of "Section mismatch" warnings w
From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 08:49:18 +0200
> >From 4dba30ccfdb911b0810f6527de66b1515349d8c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:03:25 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 01/14] kbuild: make modpost section warnings cle
>From 41fa40aeb2314458b25dd2227dc71fdecb504e5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Atsushi Nemoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:14:38 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 02/14] kbuild: make better section mismatch reports on i386,
arm and mips
On i386, ARM and MIPS, warn_sec_mismatch() sometimes fai
>From 4dba30ccfdb911b0810f6527de66b1515349d8c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:03:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] kbuild: make modpost section warnings clearer
Change modpost section mismatch warnings to be less confusing;
model them on the
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 08:17 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > AFAIK, the camera stops writing to the flash card and automatically
> > turns off when it's low on battery (before empty).
>
> But then, one should also consider the case where a cam is connected to
> AC and someone inadvertently trips o
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:01:10AM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
> When this is compiled in it is run too early to do anything useful:
> [6.052000] padlock: No VIA PadLock drivers have been loaded.
> [6.052000] padlock: Using VIA PadLock ACE for AES algorithm.
> [6.052000] padlock: Using V
I have following set of fixes queued for -rc1.
I no major comments are raised I will request for
inclusion tomorrow.
This patchset include the discussed infrastructure to silence
section mismatch warnings in the legitimite cases.
Included are also a few section mismatch fixes so my x86_64
and i38
On May 18 2007 09:01, Dongjun Shin wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm.. so operating your camera on batteries should be against the
>> warranty, since batteries commonly run empty while storing pictures?
>
> AFAIK, the camera stops writing to the flash card and
On Thu, 17 May 2007 23:20:05 -0700 (PDT) Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007, Davi Arnaut wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > poll_wait() callback may modify the waitqueue without holding the
> > context private lock.
>
> Thx Davi, patch is correct. Nice catch. But at this poi
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> We don't want neither the 'Telephony' nor 'LEDs' usages to be claimed by
> the hid-input system, that seems to make a little sense.
I changed the IS_INPUT_APPLICATION() macro to accept 'Telephony/Headset'
and now the kernel has created a new event device node for the device
On May 18 2007 08:15, DervishD wrote:
>Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 08:15:12 +0200
>From: DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: usb-storage nice value
Try ionice.
>> DervishD wrote:
>> > I'm having problems when readin
On May 17 2007 21:00, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> > > Opinions?
>> >
>> > Why would we need another btree, when there is lib/rbtree.c? Or does
>> > yours do something fundamentally different?
>>
>> It is not red-black tree, it is b+ tree.
>
> It might be better to use the prefix "bptree" to help pre
On May 17 2007 14:22, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Andrea Righi wrote:
>> I'm looking for a way to keep track of the processes that fail to allocate
>> new
>> virtual memory. What do you think about the following approach (untested)?
>
> Looks like an easy way for users to spam syslogd over and
> over an
On Thu, 17 May 2007 20:33:20 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Sun, 13 May 2007 20:14:45 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> >> I2C
> >>
> >> Subject: "Sensors Applet" give an error message "No chip detected"
> >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5
Hi,
since VIA seems to be one of the quirkier CPUs...
On May 17 2007 21:12, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On 17/05/07 13:27, Claas Langbehn wrote:
>>> Claas Langbehn wrote:
Would it be possible to override the BIOS settings of cx8 and nx and
activate it with linux anyway?
The CPU support
On Thursday 17 May 2007 10:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:36 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > BTW, there are more creative PIT users in drivers/input which use the
> > > global lock already, but the PIT usage there is definitely broken on
> > > anything >= 2.6.21.
> > >
>
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Davi Arnaut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> poll_wait() callback may modify the waitqueue without holding the
> context private lock.
Thx Davi, patch is correct. Nice catch. But at this point instead of
ending up getting two locks, we may look into using Andrew suggestion of
reusing the
Hi Stefan :)
* Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> DervishD wrote:
> > I'm having problems when reading/writing to external USB harddisks:
> > my *internal* harddisk stalls from time to time, so watching a movie
> > while copying data is a PITA (well, if the movie is bad, the leap
On Fri, 18 May 2007 01:53:20 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Platform: Fedora Core 6/x86-64 (lspci, kconfig, dmesg attached)
>
> dmesg shows:
> > PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
> > PCI: If a device doesn't work, try "pci=routeirq". If it helps, post a
> > report
> > BUG: at mm/
Hi Jeff,
On 5/18/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Platform: Fedora Core 6/x86-64 (lspci, kconfig, dmesg attached)
dmesg shows:
> PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
> PCI: If a device doesn't work, try "pci=routeirq". If it helps, post a report
> BUG: at mm/slab.c:777 __find_general_ca
On Wed, 16 May 2007 23:36:56 -0700,
"Williams, Dan J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> async_tx: add the Kconfig infrastructure for async_tx
>
> From: Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> async_tx is similar to crypto in that there is an api component and a
> drivers component.
>
> * Add 'source "a
> > Yes, on some implementations there can be other conditions that
> > make a decrementer exception go away; there is no contradiction
> > here (thankfully). My wording was sloppy.
>
> Some CPUs have the DEC exceptions basically edge triggered (yeah I know
for example?
> it sucks). That's why,
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:22:17PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:12:38 +0200
>
> > The page->virtual thing is just a bonus (although have you seen what
> > sort of hoops SPARSEMEM has to go through to find page_address?! It
> > will
On 5/18/07, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 03:43:26PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:39:54PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:34:40AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > > Hmmm, actually those other users could
From: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:12:38 +0200
> The page->virtual thing is just a bonus (although have you seen what
> sort of hoops SPARSEMEM has to go through to find page_address?! It
> will definitely be a win on those architectures).
If you set the bit ranges in
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:47:40PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 06:08:54 +0200
>
> > I'd like to be the first to propose an increase to the size of struct page
> > just for the sake of increasing it!
> >
> > If we add 8 bytes to struc
>
> Yes, on some implementations there can be other conditions that
> make a decrementer exception go away; there is no contradiction
> here (thankfully). My wording was sloppy.
Some CPUs have the DEC exceptions basically edge triggered (yeah I know
it sucks). That's why, among others, the IRQ
From: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 06:08:54 +0200
> I'd like to be the first to propose an increase to the size of struct page
> just for the sake of increasing it!
>
> If we add 8 bytes to struct page on 64-bit machines, it becomes 64 bytes,
> which is quite a nice numb
-rt adds a futex_performance_hack sysctl, which is only defined if
kernel/futex.c is built in. This fixes the build in the CONFIG_FUTEX=n
case.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
kernel/sysctl.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.21-rt3/kernel/sysctl.c20
On Friday 18 May 2007 04:18, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> This fixed oprofile being broken on x86-64 SMP. The current reservation
> runs on all CPUs, but the ones following the first, will fail since the
> reservation bitmap has an 1 in the MSR entry.
> The reservation code should really run once, and t
On Thursday 17 May 2007 16:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Both read the PIT directly, which will lead to interesting results. The
> PIT is either stopped or it can be used in one shot mode with per event
> changing intervals due to the changes introduced by the clock events
> layer.
>
> This code sh
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:38:53PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> So i've added a yield workaround to -v12, which makes it work similar to
>> how the vanilla scheduler and SD does it. (Xorg has been notified and
>> this bug should be fixed there too. This took some time to debug because
>> the 3D
Hi,
I'd like to be the first to propose an increase to the size of struct page
just for the sake of increasing it!
If we add 8 bytes to struct page on 64-bit machines, it becomes 64 bytes,
which is quite a nice number for cache purposes.
However we don't have to let those 8 bytes go to waste: we
the previous post i keep referring you to has a patch that was mangled
...here is the non-mangled version
--- ./linux-backup/arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig 2007-02-04
13:44:54.0 -0500
+++ ./linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm2/arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig
2007-05-17 18:13:07.0 -040
Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
I think it's pretty clear that Dave and Daniel were both correct and
that ACPI_PROCESSOR is the correct dependency for multi-socket systems.
However, it's worth noting that this dependency seems to be unrelated to
SMP support. Ed Sweetman has reported that his single-socket
Rik van Riel wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>> A meaningful container size does not hamper performance. I am in the
>> process
>> of getting more results (with varying container sizes). Please let me
>> know
>> what you think of the results? Would you like to see different
>> benchmarks/
>> tests/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Frank Sorenson wrote:
>> Frank Sorenson wrote:
>>
>>> Hrm. Looks like it gets past the hpet_is_known There's still something
>>> in the hpet detection code, but I didn't get to the bottom of it yet.
>>>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 23:20:12 +0530
> Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A meaningful container size does not hamper performance. I am in the process
>> of getting more results (with varying container sizes). Please let me know
>> what you think of the results? Woul
Hi,
poll_wait() callback may modify the waitqueue without holding the
context private lock.
Signed-off-by: Davi E. M. Arnaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/fs/eventfd.c b/fs/eventfd.c
index 480e2b3..9c672be 100644
--- a/fs/eventfd.c
+++ b/fs/eventfd.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ int eventfd_signal(struc
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:39:54PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:34:40AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Hmmm, actually those other users could easily write and maintain
> > a 20-line patch that does the wait for async scans thing for them
> > using /proc/scsi/scsi in a
Hi,
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:36:20PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > stuff that does select USB should depend on USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD, or we'll
> > end up with unbuildable configs.
>
> BTW, this kind of situation happens often enough, so how about doing
> the f
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 16 2007 10:42, Chris Mason wrote:
For example, I'll pick on xfs for a minute. compilebench shows the
default FS you get from mkfs.xfs is pretty slow for untarring a bunch of
kernel trees.
I suppose you used 'nobarrier'? [ http://lkml.org/lkml/2
On 18 May 2007 10:52:57 +0800 Zou Nan hai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 03:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On 17 May 2007 10:40:07 +0800
> > Zou Nan hai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > Please always prefer to use static inline functions rather than macros.
> > They ar
Sergei Shtylyov writes:
Kumar Gala wrote:
[Sergei Shtylyov]
Kumar Gala wrote:
I haven't looked at all the new clock/timer code, is there any
utility in having support for more than one clock source?
Of course, you may register as many as you like.
Sure, but is there any utility in regist
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:52:12PM +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
>
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_ALGAPI=m
Are you sure you're actually running 2.6.22-rc1? Due to a bug
in the padlock patch present in 2.6.22-rc1 it shouldn't be
possible to select ALGAPI as a module.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.open
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 22:57 -0400, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
> Wouldn't the appropriate test be to demonstrate that the same program text
> opcodes are generated in both cases for all architectures?
No, empirical testing with the compiler is never the _correct_ thing to
do. It's just expedie
Hi Bill,
On 5/18/07, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Satyam Sharma wrote:
> *Unfortunately* (the trouble with C itself, is that a *committee* has made
> it into ... something ... that it should not have made it into) -- anyway,
> unfortunately C took it upon itself to solve a problem t
I think it's pretty clear that Dave and Daniel were both correct and
that ACPI_PROCESSOR is the correct dependency for multi-socket systems.
However, it's worth noting that this dependency seems to be unrelated to
SMP support. Ed Sweetman has reported that his single-socket but
multi-core system d
Balbir Singh wrote:
A meaningful container size does not hamper performance. I am in the process
of getting more results (with varying container sizes). Please let me know
what you think of the results? Would you like to see different benchmarks/
tests/configuration results?
AIM7 results might
On Fri, 18 May 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:30 +, Matthieu CASTET wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:29:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 17 May 2007 18:09:50 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > umm.. I'd say what you'v
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 03:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On 17 May 2007 10:40:07 +0800
> Zou Nan hai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> Please always prefer to use static inline functions rather than macros.
> They are more readable, they are more likely to have comments attached to
> them and they p
Lguest guests don't use the TSC, and so we must disable it otherwise
sched-clock.c barfs.
Also, we no longer need to explicitly set the PGE feature bit:
cpu_detect->cpuid->lguest_cpuid does that for us now that cpu_detect
uses paravirt_ops (IIRC it used to do a direct cpuid from assembler).
Signe
Andrew patched up lguest after the boot parameters became a proper
structure, but in fact it can be considerably neatened.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -r ffe7ce731118 drivers/lguest/lguest.c
--- a/drivers/lguest/lguest.c Fri May 18 10:18:56 2007 +1000
+++ b/drivers/lgu
(Not sure who's code this is, but it's in 2.6.22-rc1-mm1):
If you set tsc_disable (eg "notsc" on cmdline), sched-clock.c gives a
divide by zero on boot.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -r fd2ae7085ca2 arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.cFr
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:30 +, Matthieu CASTET wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:29:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 May 2007 18:09:50 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > umm.. I'd say what you've done in there is an improvement to the
> > exiting stuff
David Howells wrote:
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, you shouldn't. We could theoretically introduce a new API for this,
but I think it would be preferable if you can fix the race in the fs.
Actually, I might be able to do better.
When making a StoreData call to the AFS server,
Hey Andrew, Andi,
The vsyscall time() function basically returns the second portion of
xtime directly. This however means that there is about a ticks worth of
time each second where time() will return a second value less then what
gettimeofday() does.
Additionally, this window where vtime
This fixed oprofile being broken on x86-64 SMP. The current reservation
runs on all CPUs, but the ones following the first, will fail since the
reservation bitmap has an 1 in the MSR entry.
The reservation code should really run once, and their addresses used on
other CPUs. There are other solu
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:05:11PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> I applied your patch and I get another oops
>
> [ 261.491499] XFS mounting filesystem loop0
> [ 261.501641] Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: loop0
> [ 261.507698] SELinux: initialized (dev loop0, type xfs), uses xattr
>
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi,
thanks for publishing this.
Add the Software NCQ support to sata_nv.c for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61 SATA
controller.
This patch base on sata_nv.c file from kernel 2.6.22-rc1
See attachment for the patch.
Signed-off-by: Kuan Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Peer C
Peer Chen wrote:
Add the Software NCQ support to sata_nv.c for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61 SATA
controller.
This patch base on sata_nv.c file from kernel 2.6.22-rc1
See attachment for the patch.
Signed-off-by: Kuan Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Peer Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Good to finally s
Main thing of note: still sorting out the shutdown mess. See the
extended commit texts for more info.
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
upstream-linus
to receive the following updates:
Documentation/feature-removal-
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-linus
to receive the following updates:
Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt |2 +-
drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h |4 +-
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 22:29 +0200, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Is there a reason why this patch can't go upstream?
Yes. A change of that magnitude will most certainly introduce
regressions. So we can either:
- Have it in -mm for monthes trying to iron out all of them (and we'll
miss some). And strug
> This is what I'm using here, it's still the same old patch (Solomon's
> plus my stuff). I think I can coordinate with [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
> create an incremental patch to fix radeonfb on his hardware (provided
> that this mega-patch is suitable as baseline that is).
Yes, I would very much appr
On Thursday, May 17, 2007, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Thu, May 17, 2007 at 03:37:45PM -0700, Jesse Barnes ha scritto:
> > This patch adds the core of the new DRM based modesetting system.
>
> A couple of comments on drm_fb since I'm somewhat familiar with fb code:
> > new file mode 100644
> > inde
On May 17, 2007, at 13:45:33, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:26:07PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
My plan was to move this code to lib/ sooner or later. If you
consider it useful in its current state, I can do it immediatly.
And if someone else merge
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:30:13PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> So why does any of this matter?
>
> My memory says that the ioapic state for sending irqs gets reset when we
> unmask the irq.
No. Atleast not on the platform we have tested.
> If not I expect we can use the mask and edge, unmas
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:18:41PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:38:53PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Even a simple 3D app like glxgears does a sys_sched_yield() for every
> > frame it generates (!) on certain 3D cards, which in essence punishes
> > any scheduler that impl
Tejun Heo wrote:
As with all other drivers, sata_nv's hpriv is allocated with
devm_kzalloc() and there's no need to free it explicitly. Kill
nv_remove_one() which incorrectly used kfree() instead of devm_kfree()
and use ata_pci_remove_one() directly.
Original fix is from Peer Chen.
Signed-off-
On Thursday, May 17, 2007, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:32 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Randy just informed me that the patch limits are bigger now, so here
> > are the actual patches.
> >
> > This patch allows for proper console unregistration via the VT layer,
> > and up
On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:19:59 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > + if (!windows)
> > + goto out2;
> > controller->window = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*controller->window) * windows,
> > GFP_KERNEL, controller->node);
> > if (!controller->window)
> >
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 04:58:02PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> In essence this makes sense, and it may be the best work around for
> buggy hardware available. However I am not convinced that the remote
> IRR on ioapics works reliably enough to be used for anything. I
> tested this earlier
On Thu, 17 May 2007 19:01:43 + (GMT)
Francis Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm testing Linux kernel version 2.6.22-rc1 using Debian Testing on an Acer
> Ferrari 3400 Laptop. This has a VIA IDE controller with the internal HDD and
> DVD writer attached. The via_pata module and SCSI dis
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Sun, 13 May 2007 20:14:45 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
I2C
Subject: "Sensors Applet" give an error message "No chip detected"
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/13/109
Submitter : Antonino Ingargiola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : Unknown
The
"Siddha, Suresh B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on x86_64 kernel, level triggered irq migration gets initiated in the context
> of that interrupt(after executing the irq handler) and following steps are
> followed to do the irq migration.
>
> 1. mask IOAPIC RTE entry; // write to IOAPIC RTE
>
On Friday May 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Fix confirmed, filled the whole 11T hard disk, without crashing.
> I presume this would go into 2.6.22
Yes, and probably 2.6.21.y, though the patch will be slightly
different, see below.
>
> Thanks again.
And thank-you for pursuing this with me.
Nei
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:38:53PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Even a simple 3D app like glxgears does a sys_sched_yield() for every
> frame it generates (!) on certain 3D cards, which in essence punishes
> any scheduler that implements sys_sched_yield() in a sane manner. This
> interaction of C
greg
and part of /etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules
...
ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
# Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4100C
SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0101", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
# Hewlett-Packard Photosmart S20 (C5101A) |
Hi,
On 5/18/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Hmm.. so operating your camera on batteries should be against the
warranty, since batteries commonly run empty while storing pictures?
AFAIK, the camera stops writing to the flash card and automatically
turns off when it's low on
"Siddha, Suresh B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on x86_64 kernel, level triggered irq migration gets initiated in the context
> of that interrupt(after executing the irq handler) and following steps are
> followed to do the irq migration.
>
> 1. mask IOAPIC RTE entry; // write to IOAPIC RTE
>
On Thu, 17 May 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
+Field name:kernel_version
+Type: read
+Offset/size: 0x20e/2
+Protocol: 2.00+
+
+ If set to a nonzero value, contains a pointer to a null-terminated
"nil-terminated"? "\0-terminated"?
Uh? That seems more than a little silly. Y
Satyam Sharma wrote:
*Unfortunately* (the trouble with C itself, is that a *committee* has made
it into ... something ... that it should not have made it into) -- anyway,
unfortunately C took it upon itself to solve a problem that it did not
have (and does not even bring about) in the first plac
Hi, Phillip,
I have said the gap between you and me is the definition of context.
In Robert's definition, *context* is used in a classification method
and really something in higher-level. And I used that term to explain
why ISR can not sleep.
If you do not like the name, name it your way and su
On Thu, 17 May 2007 11:11:42 +0200
Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [please remember to Cc: me on your replies]
>
> Greetings,
>
> is there an easy way to dump a process's pagetables from outside that
> process? Tools, /proc or /sys file or syscall that I missed?
>
/proc/pid/pagem
On Thu, 17 May 2007 16:30:44 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >>> + If set to a nonzero value, contains a pointer to a null-terminated
> >>>
> >>>
> >> "nil-terminated"? "\0-terminated"?
> >>
> >
> > Uh? That seems more than a little silly. Yes, I guess formally
> > speaking we
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Load balancing appears to be badly broken in this version. When I
started 4 hard spinners on my 2 CPU machine one ended up on one CPU
and the other 3 on the other CPU and they stayed there.
could you try to debug this a bit more
Il Thu, May 17, 2007 at 03:37:45PM -0700, Jesse Barnes ha scritto:
> This patch adds the core of the new DRM based modesetting system.
A couple of comments on drm_fb since I'm somewhat familiar with fb code:
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..0d06792
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/linux-core/drm_e
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hmpf.
>
> We cold either use rdmsr_safe or add a family check again or clear it
> in k6 setup. I think clearing it in setup is cleanest.
>
> Does this patch work?
>
> -Andi
>
> Clear MCE flag on AMD K6
>
> It reports machine check capability in CPUID, but doesn't actually
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Given that we have already established littleendian byte order, it's the
>> same thing.
>>
>
> Well, not quite; mentioning the string form first creates an ambiguity.
> I'd express as something like: ``The magic number is 0x53726448
> (impl
Philipp Kohlbecher wrote:
>
> I don't know of any problems this causes. The kernel needs to be aware
> of the fact that the xss and esp fields of the pt_regs struct may
> contain wrong values anyway, as hardware interrupts arriving while the
> CPU is in kernel mode would also lead to this conditio
1 - 100 of 455 matches
Mail list logo