On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:53:35AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Please don't -- Ivan has a patch for this, let's get that in instead.
>
> I'd be happy with that, except on the 2.4 trees where we haven't
> seen such a patch yet. (So Greg -- please hold off on this
> for 2.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:21:42AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Hi,
Some users have been sending init logs for Athlon kernels that
include PCI warning messages about the PCI cache line size
getting set incorrectly ... where the kernel thinks that the
right value is 16 bytes. S
Hi,
Some users have been sending init logs for Athlon kernels that
include PCI warning messages about the PCI cache line size
getting set incorrectly ... where the kernel thinks that the
right value is 16 bytes. Since 64 bytes is the right number,
it's dangerous to enable MWI on such systems.
Thi
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:21:42AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some users have been sending init logs for Athlon kernels that
> include PCI warning messages about the PCI cache line size
> getting set incorrectly ... where the kernel thinks that the
> right value is 16 bytes. Since 64
The error "USB device not accepting new address" can sometimes be a
symptom of an interrupt problem. Do you see interrupts increasing for this
device in /proc/interrupts? There is some more info on this in the FAQ at
http://www.linux-usb.org .
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Andrey Panin wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
ISD200 based hard drive bay doesn't work with 2.4 & 2.5,
can someone assist me with it?
Kernel message log appended.
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin| Embedded systems software developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
drivers/usb/core/usb.c: registered new dri
6 matches
Mail list logo
