On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 06:51:58 +, Matthias Juchem wrote:
> Step [7.3] is redundant because it is
> already handled by the ver_linux script
If ver_linux can take off one of those steps, why not include a script
which takes care of ALL the leg work? All of the files it asks the
reporter to includ
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 20:51:46 + (GMT),
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v
>> o modutils 2.4.0 # insmod -V
>>
>> and 2.4 uses gas instead of as86 for real mode.
>>
>> Are not that versions enough to
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 18:52:45 +0100,
"-=da TRoXX=-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a very simple question:
>I used to compile-in my framebuffer-device in the kernel
>then i just appended "video=tdfxfb:1024x768-32@70" in lilo.conf and it
>worked..
>
>now i compiled it as a module, and want modpr
On Fri, 05 Jan 2001 11:23:29 -0600,
George R. Kasica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>make[1]: Nothing to be done for `modules_install'.
>>make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.0/arch/i386/lib'
>>cd /lib/modules/2.4.0; \
>>mkdir -p pcmcia; \
>>find kernel -path '*/pcmcia/*' -name '*.o' | xar
Hi Linus.
Step [7.3] is redundant because it is
already handled by the ver_linux script
This patch is against 2.4.0
Matthias
--- REPORTING-BUGS.orig Sat Jan 6 06:49:12 2001
+++ REPORTING-BUGS Sat Jan 6 06:47:57 2001
@@ -45,11 +45,10 @@
[7.] Environment
[7.1.] Software (add the output
My best reasons are...
Development: You don't have to recompile the kernel a billion times
while working on a driver, you just recompile the module. Also, you
can debug, unload, fix, recompile, reload a module to add or fix
pieces of it all (hopefully) without rebooting.
Practical usage: When I
Duh.
I figured out the problem. In 2.4.0-test13-pre3 is the introduction of
the shmall sysctl. I had installed a package called powertweak a while
back. It looks like powertweak sets any sysctl it doesn't know to 0.
So, the problem was that there was no shared memory for X. ;(
I set that up
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:18:56AM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Stefan Traby wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:52:31PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > > On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Stefan Traby wrote:
> > >
> > > > Then I tried to unlink the file by running rm lfs.file
I've put up a patch against linux-2.4.0 for uClinux 2.4. The supported
platforms are listed below, in the announcement which was sent to the
uClinux-dev list.
We would like to merge into the mainline Linux tree in 2.5, so we've taken
an approach which touches as little as possible of the generic
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Stefan Traby wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:52:31PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Stefan Traby wrote:
> >
> > > Then I tried to unlink the file by running rm lfs.file log.
> > >
> > > The rm process (and an ls process that I started after that)
Hrm. I'm not seeing this problem on my setups.
Did you send details about your configurationlast time .. Could you
resend?
Christian Ullrich wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> About three weeks ago, I complained loudly about very slow NFS mounts
> involving a 2.2.17 server and a 2.2.18 client.
>
> Today,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:52:31PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Stefan Traby wrote:
>
> > Then I tried to unlink the file by running rm lfs.file log.
> >
> > The rm process (and an ls process that I started after that)
> > are now in "D" state...
> >
> > root 2934 0.
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:08:38PM -0500, Adrian Chung wrote:
> hde: Maxtor 91024U3, ATA DISK drive
> hdf: Maxtor 94098U8, ATA DISK drive
> hdg: QUANTUM FIREBALLP LM15, ATA DISK drive
> hdh: QUANTUM FIREBALLP LM30, ATA DISK drive
I initially added only the two quantum drives to the pdc_quirk_list
Hello!
About three weeks ago, I complained loudly about very slow NFS mounts
involving a 2.2.17 server and a 2.2.18 client.
Today, I complain loudly about *extremely* slow NFS mounts
with the very same server and the same client now running 2.4.0.
Using 2.2.18, every mount took about 15 seconds
Peter De Schrijver ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Attached you will find a patch to the tulip driver in Linux 2.4. This patch
> will interpret a bit more of 21142 extended format type 3 info blocks in a
> tulip SROM. This allows correct autonegotation of the builtin 21143 based
> ethernet adapt
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Stefan Traby wrote:
> Then I tried to unlink the file by running rm lfs.file log.
>
> The rm process (and an ls process that I started after that)
> are now in "D" state...
>
> root 2934 0.0 0.2 1292 452 pts/5D05:38 0:00 ls /ramfs
> root 2952 0.0
In certain situations, it's possible for one of the jump labels in
drivers/net/ppp_generic.c to get mangled by a macro, causing a failure
in compilation. The following patch ameliorates this somewhat:
diff -r -N linux/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c linux.wli/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c
2345c2345
<
I'd like to know (I know, I'm being slightly off topic, while still
staying on topic, so I'm on topic...er...yes) if there is any
advantage, be it memory-wise or architectuarally wise, to use modules?
I already know the obvious points of if you are creating a distro that
it is usually good to mak
Hi !
I create a sparse file on ramfs (by writing 5 bytes at offset 3GB):
0.000269 open("./lfs.file", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0600) = 3
0.000214 _llseek(3, 18446744072635809792, [3221225472], SEEK_SET) = 0
0.000159 write(3, "hallo", 5) = 5
I can't get it to fail either. All I had to do previously to get it to
fail was write a large amount of data to the loopback mounted
filesystem (rpm, cp, dd, anything), but now nothing...wonderful.
Thanks Jens. I didn't get any errors, cosmetic or otherwise (of
course, I'm still avoiding devfs, s
Raphael wrote:
> I'm using ROCK Linux, which is built with devfs, originally Kernel
> 2.4.0-test9. This problem occurs, when I want to boot some Kernel after
> 2.4.0-test9, whereas building and installing the Kernel never is a problem.
>
> I enabled devfs support as well as the mounting of devfs
Hi all,
In my schoool project (kernel 2.2.X), I would like to pass some data attached
immediately above IP. (i.e. w/o UDP and TCP) I have assigned an arbitrary
protocol # in the IP header field so that the received data is passed on to my
protocol stack.
There is no problem on reception but I go
At 10:07 PM 5/01/01 +0100, Gregor Essers wrote:
> From the pre9 relaese to the final of the 2.4 Kernel i become this Errors,
>can someone help me or have someone an idea what this mean ??.
>
>I will build this with the src.rpm from Nvidia with the spec file
>
>In file included from nv.c:52:
>nv.h:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:18:02PM +, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
> > Silly question, but have you realized that you don't have to enable
> > SMP in kernel to do multithreading ?
>
> Lest anyone think me completely clueless, yes, I'm well aware of that. It's
> just that I wanted to have tha
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:50:07PM -0500, Pete Toscano wrote:
> just a heads up that usb in smp-enabled 2.4.0 kernels running on
> machines with the via apollo pro 133a chipset is still broken. the last
> word i heard was that it's a pci irq routing problem. smp and usb will
> play together pret
* David S. Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010105 17:08]:
>Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 19:22:39 +0100
>From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On/Dnia Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:52:52AM -0800, Patrick Michael Kane wrote
>> With 2.4.0 installed, I've started to see the following
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
> You need to enable both CONNTRACK and full NAT in your configuration.
>
> Rusty, why doesn't the Config stuff just enforece this if it
> is necessary when enabling FTP support etc.?
Deja Vu: we've been through this before. But someone else
fuck^H^H
Thanks for 2.4.0. Here's a bug. . .
Compiling for Celeron with SMP disabled causes large quantities of
warnings about macros being redefined in i386_ksyms.ver
With SMP on, it does not happen.
Aaron Bentley
/usr/src/linux-2.4.0/include/linux/modules/i386_ksyms.ver:78: warning:
`cpu_data
' red
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> The sparc64 config should never allow you to build the amd7930 and
> dbri sbus sound drivers, that is a bug, and I'll fix that.
However, there's supposedly the same problem for sparc32, because the ISDN
support for the amd7930 apparantly never worked
hi.
a patch and a question:
patch: just a few missing symbols in 2.4.0-final:
--- linux-2.4/drivers/isdn/hisax/Makefile.orig Sat Jan 6 02:47:31 2001
+++ linux-2.4/drivers/isdn/hisax/Makefile Sat Jan 6 02:21:22 2001
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
hisax-objs-$(CONFIG_HISAX_ASUSCOM) += asuscom.o isa
Hi there,
I'm using ROCK Linux, which is built with devfs, originally Kernel
2.4.0-test9. This problem occurs, when I want to boot some Kernel after
2.4.0-test9, whereas building and installing the Kernel never is a problem.
I enabled devfs support as well as the mounting of devfs at bootup in t
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001, antirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 04:48:00PM -0800, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> > This rings a small bell with me.
> > There was a change by Dan Streetman IIRC to limit
> > usbdevfs bulk transfers to PAGE_SIZE (4 KB for x86,
> > or 0x1000). Anything lar
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 04:48:00PM -0800, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> This rings a small bell with me.
> There was a change by Dan Streetman IIRC to limit
> usbdevfs bulk transfers to PAGE_SIZE (4 KB for x86,
> or 0x1000). Anything larger than that returns
> an error (-EINVAL).
Yes, devio.c, proc_bul
> "Alan" == Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libint10.a (II) Module
>> int10: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.1a, module
>> version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.2 (EE)
>> ATI(0): Unable to initialise int10 in
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:39:36AM +0100, antirez wrote:
> s10sh reads 0x1400 bytes at once downloading jpges from the
> digicam, but the ioctl() that performs the bulk read fails with 2.4
> using this size. If I resize it (for example to 0x300) it works without
> problems (with high performace pe
The netfilter configuration allowed you to illegally specify
FTP support as non-modular, yet NAT support modular. That
cannot work. I would suggest changing NAT support to be
non-modular if you want FTP support non-modular.
Rusty, I think this is another case where the netfilter config
should
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > loop with no exit, as each size mtrr fails.
> > while (mtrr_add(video_base, temp_size, MTRR_TYPE_WRCOMB,
> > 1)==-EINVAL) {
> > temp_size >>= 1;
> > }
>
> Ok that one is the bug.
Even with the obv
You need to enable both CONNTRACK and full NAT in your configuration.
Rusty, why doesn't the Config stuff just enforece this if it
is necessary when enabling FTP support etc.?
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
t
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>
> > I had a similar situation except I was more interested in the performance
> > difference. Went from ~4MB/s with the 430HX controller to ~12.5MB/s with
> > the promise. This on an old Pentium system.
>
> The network is 10 mbit, so 4 MB/sec is no
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
>
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0/include -Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
> -march=i686 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include
> /usr/src/linux-2.4.0/include/linux/modversions.h -c -o ip_nat_ftp.o
>
Chris Kloiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> last 2 lines in dmesg output:
> mtrr: 0xd800,0x200 overlaps existing 0xd800,0x100
> mtrr: 0xd800,0x200 overlaps existing 0xd800,0x100
Are you running XFree86-4.0.x?
> cat /proc/mtrr
> reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), siz
From: Marek Gresko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Fri, 5 Jan 2001 18:16:34 +0100
When I initiate connection from Solaris machine everything goes OK.
TCP/SYN,ACK segments are OK.
Can anyone help me?
Does:
bash# echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
Fix the problem? If so, ple
Date:Fri, 5 Jan 2001 19:22:39 +0100
From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On/Dnia Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:52:52AM -0800, Patrick Michael Kane wrote
> With 2.4.0 installed, I've started to see the following errors:
>
> reset_xmit_timer sk=cfd889a0 1 when=0x3b4a,
> I had a similar situation except I was more interested in the performance
> difference. Went from ~4MB/s with the 430HX controller to ~12.5MB/s with
> the promise. This on an old Pentium system.
The network is 10 mbit, so 4 MB/sec is no good in this case.
I've got the thing running, with (ibm)
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Evan Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Hmm...seems as though Alan released 2.4.0-ac2 1 year ago (check out
> the time stamps on ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/)
>
zeus 1 % ls -l /pub/linux/kernel/people
This rings a small bell with me.
There was a change by Dan Streetman IIRC to limit
usbdevfs bulk transfers to PAGE_SIZE (4 KB for x86,
or 0x1000). Anything larger than that returns
an error (-EINVAL).
~Randy
___
|randy.dunlap_at_intel.com503-67
Lukas Dobrek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> I've following problem with compiling kernel-2.2.18 on AXP machine:
>
> make -C arch/alpha/lib
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/linux/arch/alpha/lib'
> /usr/bin/kgcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/linu
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:04:29AM +0100, antirez wrote:
> I'll do some test with the new 2.4 kernel to find if there is a problem
> in s10sh itself. A good test can be to try if the equivalent driver
> of gphoto works without problems using the 2.4 kernel (however it also
> uses the libusb). The
I am using a 3Com 905C Tornado Vortex Driver and the official 2.4.0, and
the driver does not start up. I think I had the same problem with this
driver in the 2.2 kernel, which forced me to use 3com's 3c90x, which is
not available for 2.4. Below are the specs:
Sorry for not including more, info bu
Date:Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:00:21 -0800
From: Joshua Uziel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Basically, those two should be removed from the config options for
sparc64... and in the meantime, you should build without 'em. :)
Note that 2.2.x has this exact fix already, and that 2.2.x fix
came f
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
2.4.0 Kernel Fails to compile when CONFIG_IP_NF_FTP is selected
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
2.4.0 Kernel Fails to compile when CONFIG_IP_NF_FTP is selected (see
error output below)
[3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel):
2.4.0,
Hi,
I recently posted a patch for the coprocessor device in the 2.4.0 sound drivers. Well,
it appears that I missed the synth device in the mpu401.c file and so here is an
updated version.
Cheers,
Chris
diff -urN -X linux-2.4.0/dontdiff linux-vanilla/drivers/sound/audio.c
linux-2.4.0/driver
Hello,
I've following problem with compiling kernel-2.2.18 on AXP machine:
make -C arch/alpha/lib
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/linux/arch/alpha/lib'
/usr/bin/kgcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/linux/include
-D__ASSEMBLY__ -c -o stxcpy.o stxcpy.S
st
While playing mp3's on XMMS, I get squeaks at random intervals. It
seems to correlate slightly with disk usage, but other than that it
seems random. These squeaks did not occur with 2.4.0-prerelease, and no
changes to the cmpci driver have occurred between -prerelease and
-final. Was there an i
The sparc64 config should never allow you to build the amd7930 and
dbri sbus sound drivers, that is a bug, and I'll fix that.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please re
* Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010105 09:24]:
> Sun Ultra 1, RH 6.2 + updates (+ local hacks)
>
> Building modules:
>
> In drivers/sbus/audio:
>
> amd7930.c:113: ../../isdn/hisax/foreign.h: No such file or directory
> amd7930.c:1159: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
>
Josh Fryman writes:
> does anyone out there know if linux has been successfully ported to the Intel
> IXP1200 programmable network processor? it's got an SA-1 core with lots of
> frills, and there have been rumors of a linux port, but i can't find anything
> through normal channels.
Yes there is
There is a possibility I could work on here at LLNL. My group has
been talking about investigating Infiniband and we figured Linux would
be a good spot to start with it. The ASCI Purple machine (100 TFLOPS)
will probably use IB for it's I/O network, though there is obviously
no commitment to is
Mike wrote:
> Hi All !
>
> I am installing Redhat 7.0 on my DNS/mail server. Is there any problem
> with Redhat 7.0 you faced or any bug in Redhat 7.0.
There are some bugs, but just make sure to install
all the updates and they will be fixed. BTW gated is
b0rken, I had to roll my own - everythng
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:16:32PM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> Here is a patch that changes the superuser check in lp to use
> capabilities instead.
Just for the fun (?) of it, I made a grep/visual inspection for all
occurences of suser/fsuser, and found the following:
./fs/ufs/balloc.c -- 1 occur
hi,
does anyone out there know if linux has been successfully ported to the Intel
IXP1200 programmable network processor? it's got an SA-1 core with lots of
frills, and there have been rumors of a linux port, but i can't find anything
through normal channels.
cheers,
josh
-
To unsubscribe f
The vmalloc pool runs from 0xf800 to FIXADDR_START,
which is a few pages below the top of virtual address space.
The pkmap area is from 0xfe00 to 0xfe40, which fits
within the vmalloc pool.
There does not seem to be any mechanism to prevent these two
from stepping on each other's toe
Nicolas Parpandet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm testing 2.4 series for few weeks,
> even the last prerelease
>
> I've seen stranges things :
>
> I cannot access to some ips adresses ! :
> in http or in smtp using "konqueror", "netscape",
> "mail", "telnet 25".
>
> I cannot login to hotmail (in the w
Mike wrote:
> Hi !!
>
> When i boot linux from rescue disk, i get following message:
>
> VFS: Insert root floppy disk to be loaded in RAM disk and press ENTER
>
> Now how can i create a root disk... I am trying to boot Redhat 6.0
A Slackware boot disk can do wonders here -
I never cared for Red
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:25:09AM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Torrey Hoffman wrote:
>
> > I had exactly this problem with the Maxtor 61 GB drive on my
> > Pentium based server. Theoretically a BIOS upgrade could fix it,
> > but ASUS quit making BIOS upgrades for my mot
Memory sizing for old machines whose BIOSen don't speak E820
got broken in 2.4.0-test13-pre4:
--- v2.4.0-test12/linux/arch/i386/kernel/setup.cMon Dec 11 17:59:43 2000
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c Thu Dec 21 14:01:19 2000
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@
e820.nr_map = 0;
Has anyone started IB support project for Linux yet? Particularly I am
interested in OS support and verbs layer from Linux side. I am involved in
an IB product on HCA and TCA side. Current solution will be emulating scsi
but eventually all IB component is required. I noticed that kernel 2.4.0
hdg: QUANTUM FIREBALLP LM15, ATA DISK drive
hdh: QUANTUM FIREBALLP LM30, ATA DISK drive
Well add these to the quirk list in the pdc202xx.c
There are known issues with several versions of the FIRMWARE of the
"QUANTUM FIREBALLP LM***" series.
Cheers,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Adrian Chung wrote:
>
I'd like to request that if you are responsible for an option that can be
configured in the kernel, that you look at the help for it and make sure it is
currently up to date.
I know that it is more important to the correct function of the kernel that your
software actually be fully implemented an
diff -rub 2.4.0/CREDITS linux/CREDITS
--- 2.4.0/CREDITS Fri Jan 5 09:00:34 2001
+++ linux/CREDITS Fri Jan 5 09:00:34 2001
@@ -3014,5 +3014,5 @@
# Don't add your name here, unless you really _are_ after Marc
# alphabetically. Leonard used to be very proud of being the
# last entry,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:35:03PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>
> o E820 handling fixup (Andrea Arcangeli)
I guess this was supposed to be partly backed out for 2.4 too:
--- linux-2.4.0/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c.orig Sun Dec 31 20:26:18 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0/arch
Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:52:15PM -0800, Jordan Mendelson wrote:
> >
> > Alright, this is driving me nuts. I have a Canon S20 digital camera
> > hooked up to a Sony XG series laptop via the USB port and am using s10sh
> > to access it. s10sh uses libusb 0.1.1, but I've also tr
James Stevenson writes:
> should there be 2 files in that diretory with the same name ?
No.
> mistral@sx:/proc/sys/net/unix$ ls -la
> total 0
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root0 Jan 5 21:09 ./
> dr-xr-xr-x 8 root root0 Jan 5 21:09 ../
> -rw--- 1 root root
I'm getting an error message from linux-2.4.0 which I wasn't getting
with linux-2.4.0-test10. I have an MS-6167 motherboard. Both kernels
report
Jan 5 16:39:17 jhereg kernel: BIOS-e820: d000 @ 0fff3000 (ACPI
data)
Jan 5 16:39:17 jhereg kernel: BIOS-e820: 300
I've been searching and watching lists for a while trying to figure
out whether this problem had been solved or not, and haven't found
anything suitable...
I'm experiencing two problems with a Promise UDMA66 controller
(PDC20262) on hardware I'll list below. The first problem is that
on bootup I
Hi,
I just tried make config, the generated .config file
is the same as before. Will it bring any difference if
I compile again?
Thanks!
Xiangping
-Original Message-
From: Andre Hedrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 4:35 PM
To: chen, xiangping
Cc: '[EMAIL PR
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:13:27PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:56:40PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > * VM: experiment with different active lists / aging pages
> > > of different ages at different rates + other page replacement
> > > improvements
> >
You know, it makes me really love free OSes when I see a simple
question asked on the list, and it's answered by the guy who
writes the code!!!
Cheers to Alan, Andre, Linus, Rik, R. Gooch, Mingo, HPA and all
the rest who I forgot. You guys ROCK!
-Shawn
On 01/05, Andre Hedrick rearranged the ele
> So what do you say. Can we use my patch to allow the user to override the VESA
> detected memory size... or does anyone else have a better plan?
It seems a passable solution. The mtrr bug is real either way and wants a fix.
If the 2Mb reporting is wrong perhaps they will fix the bios ;)
-
> Silly question, but have you realized that you don't have to enable
> SMP in kernel to do multithreading ?
Lest anyone think me completely clueless, yes, I'm well aware of that. It's
just that I wanted to have that warm fuzzy feeling the comes from pretending I
had the cash to buy a dual pro
Hi, Folks
Another problem I meet in boot up is that the root filesystem
can be mount as readonly at first, but it fails to be mounted
as read/write during boot up, the error reported as:
The superblock can not be read or does not describe a correct
ext2 filesystem. ...
f
Gerd Knorr wrote:
> Well, vesafb really depends on what the vesa bios says...
Exactly my problem. In my laptop, I have a NeoMagic 2160 which does not have use
the last 64k of video for sound buffer like the NeoMagic 256es do yet it still
reports that the memory is not video memory. Both XF
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:27:38PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > No other then filesystem IO (page/buffercache) is actively tied
> > to the VM, so there should be no problems.
>
> Not right now, no. But if you know what is possible
> (and planned) with the kiobuf layer, you should think
> twice
Maybe run make config and not make oldconfig.
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, chen, xiangping wrote:
> Hi, folks
>
> I meet some problem when I tried by install kernel 2.4.0
> to a PC using IDE disk. It reports VFS panic error during
> boot up time when it tried to mount the rootfs. The error
> indicates
Hi, folks
I meet some problem when I tried by install kernel 2.4.0
to a PC using IDE disk. It reports VFS panic error during
boot up time when it tried to mount the rootfs. The error
indicates that it can not find the driver for the harddisk,
but I already build in the IDE disk support. The hard
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:20:24PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > > * VM: Use kiobuf IO in VM instead buffer_head IO.
> > >
> > > I'd vote for killing both bufer_head and kiobuf from VM.
> > > Lokk at my pageio patch - VM doesn't know about the
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:20:24PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > * VM: Use kiobuf IO in VM instead buffer_head IO.
> >
> > I'd vote for killing both bufer_head and kiobuf from VM.
> > Lokk at my pageio patch - VM doesn't know about the use of kiobufs
> > in the filesystem IO...
>
> Could b
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:56:40PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > * VM: experiment with different active lists / aging pages
> > > of different ages at different rates + other page replacement
> > > improvements
> > > * VM: Quality of Service
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:31:23AM -0500, Chris Kloiber wrote:
>
> Possibly related symptoms:
>
> kernel 2.4.0-ac1 compiled with gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux
> 7.0)
>
> last 2 lines in dmesg output:
> mtrr: 0xd800,0x200 overlaps existing 0xd800,0x100
> mtrr: 0xd8
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:56:40PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > * VM: experiment with different active lists / aging pages
> > of different ages at different rates + other page replacement
> > improvements
> > * VM: Quality of Service / fairness / ... improvements
> * VM: Use kiobuf IO
Hi
should there be 2 files in that diretory with the same name ?
mistral@sx:/proc/sys/net/unix$ ls -la
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root0 Jan 5 21:09 ./
dr-xr-xr-x 8 root root0 Jan 5 21:09 ../
-rw--- 1 root root0 Jan 5 21:09 max_dgram_ql
>From the pre9 relaese to the final of the 2.4 Kernel i become this Errors,
can someone help me or have someone an idea what this mean ??.
I will build this with the src.rpm from Nvidia with the spec file
In file included from nv.c:52:
nv.h:131: warning: #warning This driver is not officially
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> I suppose the other area to look at is how pages are layed out when
> they are swapped to disk. If you go from medium memory pressure (where
> unused pages have been swapped already) to thrashing, then if you can
> put the remaining pages of each pro
> "Alan" == Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libint10.a (II) Module
>> int10: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.0.1a, module
>> version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.2 (EE)
>> ATI(0): Unable to initialise int10 in
On Friday, January 05, 2001 04:32:50 PM -0200 Marcelo Tosatti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I think we want to remove flush_dirty_buffers() from bdflush.
>> >
>>
>> Whoops. If bdflush doesn't balance the dirty list, who does?
>
> Who marks buffers dirty.
>
> Linus changed mark_buffer_
> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libint10.a
> (II) Module int10: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
> compiled for 4.0.1a, module version = 1.0.0
> ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.2
> (EE) ATI(0): Unable to initialise int10 interface.
Thats the critical bit but it
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:00:40AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> I made the same request to Jordan Mendelson yesterday, who has the same
> problem. Could you be so kind as to try to narrow down which kernel
> version this broke on? I have reports that it used to work on -test9
> but doesn't now. Coul
Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> The following patch does this, and it also changes the readahead code to
> readaround. I'm not sure if readaround is better than readahead for the
> swapin case, and I'll have to test this more to make sure.
No comment on the code itself, but in general I would think tha
Hi there. Having been running the 2.4.0-test kernels on my laptop, I
quickly upgraded to 2.4.0 when it came out. A problem quickly arose:
X won't start.
Under 2.4.0-test12 it works fine.
Under 2.4.0 it exits after trying to load the int10 module...
from 2.4.0-test12 (and all others):
(II)
> o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v
> o modutils 2.4.0 # insmod -V
>
> and 2.4 uses gas instead of as86 for real mode.
>
> Are not that versions enough to delete the
> __asm__(".section .modinfo\n\t.previous");
> in module.h ?
Firstly the
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
