While writing some user-space code recently, I ran across two bugs
in the Rock Ridge support code. First, a bogus return value and
second links on the cd of the form foo->/bar are returned
as foo->//bar. This should fix it.
-WJ
BTW, I don't read frequently so reply personally.
--- linux/fs/i
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest
> > net-utils??
>
> what is the problem? Do u have a bug or do u mean general IPv6 Support?
> There are a lot of unoficial IPv6 Packa
Matt Stegman writes:
> A few weeks ago Alan Cox mentioned, in reply to someone asking about
> building an enourmous RAID array,
>
> "Right now 2.2 doesnt support journalling over software raid so that would
> stop you using reiserfs and ext3."
>
> http://kernelnotes.org/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_
David S. Miller wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Wagner)
>
> How could it be for another connection, if it has source and
> destination port numbers?
>
>Consider previously existing connections with the same src/dst/ports
>and the effects of massive packet reordering and other transmi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest
> net-utils??
what is the problem? Do u have a bug or do u mean general IPv6 Support?
There are a lot of unoficial IPv6 Packages, Debian has a good Collection,
and we are trying to
Thank you!
I've been waiting for someone to send me that stack. There aren't any real
smoking guns there. I'm guessing that the difference between your laptop and
the machine it works on is that your laptop is running a fairly recent kernel
(2.4.0-testx) and the other isn't. The sigcontext
David Ford wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, David Ford wrote:
> > > Does anyone have any driver for this, or does anyone have a driver that
> > > has been started?
> >
> > What's the PCI id? Does drivers/sound/cs46xx.c work after adding your
> > PCI id?
>
> The ID is already
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Rui Sousa wrote:
> After starting 2 processes that scan a lot of files (diff, find,
> slocate, ...) it's impossible to run any other processes that
> touch the disk, they will stall until one of the first two stop.
> Could this be a sign of starvation in the elevator code?
It
Hello,
I've been using ext3 for some time now on an NFS server, with excellent
results (it's crashed once, and I didn't have to wait for fsck! yay!).
I'm also wanting to upgrade to RAID (in software, since I'm short on
cash).
A few weeks ago Alan Cox mentioned, in reply to someone asking abo
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, David Ford wrote:
> > Does anyone have any driver for this, or does anyone have a driver that
> > has been started?
>
> What's the PCI id? Does drivers/sound/cs46xx.c work after adding your
> PCI id?
The ID is already in the file but the kernel doesn't p
Hi,
I reported this problem before but didn't get any answers so I'm posting
again.
After starting 2 processes that scan a lot of files (diff, find,
slocate, ...) it's impossible to run any other processes that touch
the disk, they will stall until one of the first two stop. Could this be
a sig
÷ÎÉÍÁÎÉÅ!
ëÔÏ-ÔÏ ÒÁÓÓÙÌÁÅÔ ÏÞÅÎØ "ÈÏÒÏÛÕÀ" ÜËÒÁÎÎÕÀ ÚÁÓÔÁ×ËÕ, Budweiser Frogs
"BUDDYLST.ZIP". åÓÌÉ ÷Ù ÅÅ ÚÁÇÒÕÚÉÔÅ, ÷Ù ÐÏÔÅÒÑÅÔÅ ×ÓÅ!!! ÷ÁÛ ÖÅÓÔËÉÊ ÄÉÓË
ÂÕÄÅÔ ÐÏ×ÒÅÖÄÅÎ É ÌÀÂÏÊ ÐÏÌÕÞÉÔ ÉÍÑ É ÐÁÒÏÌØ ×ÁÛÅÇÏ ÜËÒÁÎÁ ÉÚ éÎÔÅÒÎÅÔÁ.îå
úáçòõöáêôå åçï îé ðòé ëáëéè ïâóôïñôåìøóô÷áè!!! ïÎ ÐÏÓÔÕÐÉÌ × ÏÂÒÁÝÅÎ
Hi,
I've been playing with user-mode linux (2.4.0-pre9). It works well on
one machine, but on my laptop I'm consistently getting stack overflows
just as init is started.
The backtrace (from a breakpoint at panic()):
(gdb) bt
#0 panic (fmt=0x10112e00 "Stack overflowed onto current_task page")
I hope this is going to the right list/group/etc, as I got this email
address from someone on #kernelnewbies...
Attempting to mkraid /dev/md0 a raid5 array using a Buslogic Flashpoint
fast SCSI PCI card will always hard lock the system at exactly 2% complete.
There is no oops or log, and
[Philipp Rumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> The idea isn't bad, but I'm not sure magic comments are really the
> way to go. special macros should work just as well, shouldn't they ?
To be defined where? Do we assume everyone will #include
or something? Or #include ? It
seems a little absurd, sinc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Hawkins) wrote on 03.10.00 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> One reason I stopped running and recommending Redhat was the inferior
> quality of their packages. They'd ship half-complete, half-assed
> packages and it was concerned end-users who'd have to make their own
> RPMS
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:39:53PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Well, having .in and .mak files with single lines in them seems ugly
> to me. What about make dep scanning for
>
> /* Makefile: obj-$(CONFIG_MY_DRIVER) += mydriver.o */
> /* Config.in: bool CONFIG_MY_DRIVER */
>
> i
Oct 7 18:48:01 manos PAM_pwdb[727]: (login) session opened for user root by
LOGIN(uid=0)
Oct 7 18:48:08 manos kernel: scsi1 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI
devices
Oct 7 18:48:08 manos kernel: scsi : 2 hosts.
Oct 7 18:49:32 manos PAM_pwdb[728]: (login) session opened for user
Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style
> > makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to
> > a Config.in, and a patch which adds the driver to the tree.
> >
> > It would make adding new drivers to vendo
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 02:10:31PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > kernel proper and working. If it *IS* ready now, what sort of
> > Athlon hardware is recommended for a developmental machine?
>
> I HIGHLY recommend duron/thunderbird, KT133, PC133, UDMA machines;
> they work very well with modern (2
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 10:56:51PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > I would appreciate you not bouncing off the walls...
>
> The main goal is to encourage NetApp management to do the right thing.
> If refraining from making inflamatory remarks about burning down the
> USTPO helps advance that p
In Original Message
From: "Andre Hedrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mikhail Vladimirov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: Quantum lct08 & Ultra66 on GigaByte GA-BX2000+
You wrote me literally:
>
> Read the source code and put the com
Hi,
Since i2c was added to the kernel, I have sometimes trouble with my bttv
card. Before that, I never had any trouble with bttv since kernel 2.2.0.
The modules are loaded when I start X with vidmode extension turned on. When
everything goes well I see the following in my syslog:
kernel: Linux
>Well, having .in and .mak files with single lines in them seems ugly
>to me. What about make dep scanning for
>
>/* Makefile: obj-$(CONFIG_MY_DRIVER) += mydriver.o */
>/* Config.in: bool CONFIG_MY_DRIVER */
>
>in .c files?
>
> I would appreciate you not bouncing off the walls...
The main goal is to encourage NetApp management to do the right thing.
If refraining from making inflamatory remarks about burning down the
USTPO helps advance that purpose then that's exactly what I'll do.
Incidently, the continuing contro
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, James Lewis Nance wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 03:59:48PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > the following patch contains 2 fixes and one addition
> > to the VM layer:
>
> This kernel is working well for me. I have been off the net
> for about a week and a half, so I did
Hi Kernelfolks,
I know kernelcompiling is not the only useful thing we do within Linux but
it is one of the longer lasting tasks.
Therefore I timed Linux kernel 2.2.16-pre9, 2.4.0-test6, 2.4.0-test9-pre7
and 2.4.0-test9 compiling bzImage.
System: Linux mandrake 7.1 UP Pentium2 266@300
2.4.0-
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 03:59:48PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> the following patch contains 2 fixes and one addition
> to the VM layer:
Rik,
This kernel is working well for me. I have been off the net for about
a week and a half, so I did not get to try any of the latter test9-preX
kernels,
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Well, having .in and .mak files with single lines in them seems ugly
> to me. What about make dep scanning for
>
> /* Makefile: obj-$(CONFIG_MY_DRIVER) += mydriver.o */
> /* Config.in: bool CONFIG_MY_DRIVER */
>
> in .c files?
Isn't "m
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 09:19:45PM -0400, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> Jeff Merkey wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:31:05AM -0400, jeff millar wrote:
> >> Redhat support got back to me today and said 7.0 doesnt support
> >> upgrades to systems running devfs. But I thought sure than Linus
> >> bl
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> void go_take_a_dump (float load)
> {
> if (pull_down_pants() && purge_bowles() && wipe_anus() && pull_up_pants())
> flush(load);
> else
> wear(load);
> }
But here you make another classic mistake. Consider the case where
purge_bowels() fai
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:42:16PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> "Forever shall I be." wrote:
> >
> > I got this OOPS while unloading the ns558 module.. I don't think it did
> > this in 2.4.0-test8, but I don't recall ever unloading it in test8..
> >
> > I've attached the ksymoops output..
> What
Hi!
> > It's kind of silly and an abuse of the VFS, I agree. Unfortunately, it's
> > been around for a while, it works on other systems and real people are
> > using it. And they get a nasty surprise when they try it on Linux: the
> > amd-provided NFS filesystems cannot be unmounted, because the
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> > append "hdd=ide-scsi"
Am I doing this wrong? It seems to work.
:-)
Jeff
>
> append "hdd=scsi" is better.
>
> Andre Hedrick
> The Linux ATA/IDE guy
>
-
To unsubscribe from thi
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:13:45PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 06:45:38PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> You are right of course. I'm open to suggestions on exactly how best to
> behave. The object is to make the most
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> append "hdd=ide-scsi"
append "hdd=scsi" is better.
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/l
Hi!
> So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style
> makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to
> a Config.in, and a patch which adds the driver to the tree.
>
> It would make adding new drivers to vendor kernel packages a whole lot
> easi
> kernel proper and working. If it *IS* ready now, what sort of
> Athlon hardware is recommended for a developmental machine?
I HIGHLY recommend duron/thunderbird, KT133, PC133, UDMA machines;
they work very well with modern (2.4) kernels. K6-2 machines are
not anywhere close to the same perfo
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Dave Gilbert wrote:
> It looses interrupts in the IDE probes; it is a CMD646 controller and
> what appears to be happening is that it is getting the wrong IRQs...
This was a generic ide problem in test9.
r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
Hi,
2.4.0-test9 failed to boot on my LX164 Alpha system; 2.4.0-test8 works
fine.
It looses interrupts in the IDE probes; it is a CMD646 controller and
what appears to be happening is that it is getting the wrong IRQs; under
2.4.0-test8 we see:
Oct 7 18:19:57 tardis kernel: CMD646: IDE contr
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 06:45:38PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Marty Fouts wrote:
> >
> Well, I like your version more than Jeff's because if you're right then
> I still have time to make a whitehat patent application for my better
> atomic commit method. What's a whitehat patent? It's one
Read the source code and put the complete drive name in the quirk list for
that chipset.
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Mikhail Vladimirov wrote:
> Hi, people!
> Here I am :-)
> I just want to remember: It's already test9 but... :-(
> All what I certainly have is kernel panic at FS mounting point.
> N
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07 2000, Dax Kelson wrote:
> > > BTW, how did your testing of the speed=4 problem with ide-scsi turn
> > > out. We are still seeing the speed=2 problem on 2.4.0-pre9. I cannot
> > > get the drive to burn clean unless the s
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 09:11:44PM -0700, Marty Fouts wrote:
> I don't know a lawyer I would trust who would give free legal advice on a
> mailing list without the usual disclaimers.
You should go back and read the start of this thread. I've hired an
IP Patent attorney to handle the Tux 2 Paten
I've been considering a possible upgrade now for quite a while,
but wanted to wait until just the right time to do so. The
purpose of an upgrade of course to get more performance out of
the system.
I got a freebie loaner upgrade recently from a K6-200 to a
K62-350. I had to clock the chip to 30
"Forever shall I be." wrote:
>
> I got this OOPS while unloading the ns558 module.. I don't think it did
> this in 2.4.0-test8, but I don't recall ever unloading it in test8..
>
> I've attached the ksymoops output..
>
> --
> Zinx Verituse(See headers for gpg/pgp key info
Marty Fouts wrote:
>
> I don't know a lawyer I would trust who would give free legal advice on a
> mailing list without the usual disclaimers.
You mean 'I am a lawyer but this is not legal advice'. Hmm, I think the
fact that it's on a mailing list and doesn't say 'here's my advice'
should be di
Hi, people!
Here I am :-)
I just want to remember: It's already test9 but...
:-(
All what I certainly have is kernel panic at FS
mounting point.
Nothing was changed in other words
Think everybody may have my experience, trying to
install 2.4.0 to Quantum lct08 UDMA66 drive
attached as a s
I'm trying to read an IDE drive from a different architecture on my x86
PC, and "hda=bswap" doesn't seem to work anymore. The option is
recognized (because I get "ide_setup: hda=bswap" in the boot output) but
it does not appear to have any effect.
--
Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems and N
I got this OOPS while unloading the ns558 module.. I don't think it did
this in 2.4.0-test8, but I don't recall ever unloading it in test8..
I've attached the ksymoops output..
--
Zinx Verituse(See headers for gpg/pgp key info)
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test9. Optio
Hello!
> namely, it only happens with probability 1/2^32 (you hope).
This can happen with probability close to 1 or even exactly 1,
depending on sequence number selection algorithm.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMA
Maybe some of us don't use white Xterms.. -bg black (can't remember if
that's exact, but it's something like that) isn't hard to do :)
- Original Message -
From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: Why
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jamie Lokier) writes:
>Alexander Viro wrote:
>> ITYM "cute". As in "cute dancing paperclip". As colourized ls.
>Hey, colour ls is _useful_!
Use white background Xterm. Come again?
First thing I do on _all_ RH installations is "rm /etc/profile.d/colorls*"
One of the biggest
From: Rienk de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Sat, 7 Oct 2000 12:49:56 +0200
NMI watchdog detected LOCKUP CPU0
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010 : [}
EFLAGS: 0086
A lot of other figures I didnt jot down
cconsole shuts up
You have to write down all the figures and either:
> Something like this?
Close but now there is no select.
--- /opt/kernel/linux-2.4.0-test9/drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c Sat Sep 23
01:04:46 2000
+++ drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c Sat Oct 7 10:52:13 2000
@@ -435,7 +435,6 @@
+ SELECT_DRIVE(HWIF(drive), drive);
if (IDE_CONTROL_REG)
Hi,
With 2.2.16 My dual Celeron300A (FSB 66MHz) works flawlessly, merrily cracking
away with RC5DES for weeks on end,
But, when trying to upgrade to 2.4.0-test9, or 2.2.17, shit happens...
NMI watchdog detected LOCKUP CPU0
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010 : [}
EFLAGS: 0086
A lot of other figures I didnt
Hi,
With 2.2.16 My dual Celeron300A (FSB 66MHz) works flawlessly, merrily cracking
away with RC5DES for weeks on end,
But, when trying to upgrade to 2.4.0-test9, or 2.2.17, shit happens...
NMI watchdog detected LOCKUP CPU0
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010 : [}
EFLAGS: 0086
A lot of other figures I didnt
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, David Ford wrote:
> Does anyone have any driver for this, or does anyone have a driver that
> has been started?
What's the PCI id? Does drivers/sound/cs46xx.c work after adding your
PCI id?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
On Sat, Oct 07 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > I regurlarly burn CD-R with ide-scsi on 2.4, and I've not noticed any
> > problems (this is on two different atapi writers). This could be an
> > ide-scsi bug on some models. The folks who are seeing corruption, could
> > they try and narrow it down? I
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I regurlarly burn CD-R with ide-scsi on 2.4, and I've not noticed any
> problems (this is on two different atapi writers). This could be an
> ide-scsi bug on some models. The folks who are seeing corruption, could
> they try and narrow it down? Is it random
On Sat, Oct 07 2000, Dax Kelson wrote:
> > BTW, how did your testing of the speed=4 problem with ide-scsi turn
> > out. We are still seeing the speed=2 problem on 2.4.0-pre9. I cannot
> > get the drive to burn clean unless the speed setting is cranked down to
> > speed=2.
> >
> > Jeff
>
> I j
Does anyone have any driver for this, or does anyone have a driver that
has been started?
-d
--
"There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are
virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
I had problems loading a variant of this kernel on a 386. The problems
are now more obvious, as I've tried to operate this kernel, compiled for
a 386, on my pentium pro.
In this case, the kernel starts up, but has no communication with the
screen. No messages are logged to the screen. However, th
63 matches
Mail list logo
