Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: add send_recv() op in tpm_class_ops

2025-03-27 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:02:32PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:48:17AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:53:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 04:24:32PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > From: Stefano Garzarella

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: add send_recv() op in tpm_class_ops

2025-03-27 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:48:17AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:53:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 04:24:32PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > From: Stefano Garzarella > > > > > > Some devices do not support interrupts and prov

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: add send_recv() op in tpm_class_ops

2025-03-27 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:53:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 04:24:32PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: From: Stefano Garzarella Some devices do not support interrupts and provide a single operation to send the command and receive the response on the same buffer.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: add send_recv() op in tpm_class_ops

2025-03-26 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 04:24:32PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > From: Stefano Garzarella > > Some devices do not support interrupts and provide a single operation > to send the command and receive the response on the same buffer. > > To support this scenario, a driver could set TPM_CHIP_FL