Jarkko, I've realised I've somehow introduced a typo in the patch below
that means it doesn't fire correctly; I'm not sure how this happened as
my local copy I was testing on is definitely correct. Would you like a
one line fix up patch, or can you manually fix it up in your tree?
This hunk:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 04:49:15PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> Jarkko, I've realised I've somehow introduced a typo in the patch below that
> means it doesn't fire correctly; I'm not sure how this happened as my local
> copy I was testing on is definitely correct. Would you like a one line fi
Dear Jonathan,
Some nits, should you resend. Feel free to ignore. The verb *work
around* is spelled with a space.
Am 10.03.25 um 13:19 schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
From: Jonathan McDowell
Some Infineon devices have a issue where the status register will get
stuck with a quick REQUEST_USE / C
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:19:55PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> From: Jonathan McDowell
>
> Some Infineon devices have a issue where the status register will get
> stuck with a quick REQUEST_USE / COMMAND_READY sequence. This is not
> simply a matter of requiring a longer timeout; the work a
From: Jonathan McDowell
Some Infineon devices have a issue where the status register will get
stuck with a quick REQUEST_USE / COMMAND_READY sequence. This is not
simply a matter of requiring a longer timeout; the work around is to
retry the command submission. Add appropriate logic to do this i
