On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed for,
> well, embedding.
Correct. As plain text has no concept of a paragraph, using \n, \n\n,
\r\n, \r\n\r\n, or any other convention for a paragraph is arbitrary.
So if
On 06/25/2012 01:42 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed for,
>> well, embedding.
> Correct.
Good. But
> As plain text has no concept of a paragraph,
Well, that really depends on wh
Schachar, I before addressing the issue at hand, I would like to state
an observation. When I reply to your mail, all text is of the same
quote level. That is, there is a single > at the beginning of each
line, whether it is a line that you wrote or a line that I wrote.
Obviously, I am replying to
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:42:20 +0300
> From: Dotan Cohen
> Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>
> [...] plain text has no concept of a paragraph [...]
That's not true. The UBA explicitly defines a paragraph as chunk of
text delimited by paragraph separator characters:
Paragraphs are divided by th
On 06/25/2012 06:21 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Schachar, I before addressing the issue at hand, I would like to state
> an observation. When I reply to your mail, all text is of the same
> quote level. That is, there is a single > at the beginning of each
> line, whether it is a line that you wrote o
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:19:01 +0300
> From: Shachar Shemesh
> Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>
> > \r\n, \r\n\r\n, or any other convention for a paragraph is arbitrary.
> Technically true, but both irrelevant and misleading. Misleading because
> the choice of \n or \r\n was arbitrary, but is now
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:21:25 +0300
> From: Dotan Cohen
> Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>
> So we have established that sections of text separated by newlines are
> paragraphs. Let us return to the issue. In a plain text file, as
> defined above, there does exist a method by which the author of
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:02:48 +0300
> From: Shachar Shemesh
> Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>
> > Therefore there is no
> > need for HTML to send RTL emails, nor is there technical need for the
> > email client to guess.
> Except there so no standard, de-facto or otherwise (as far as I'm aware)
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:06:14 +0300
> From: Shachar Shemesh
> Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>
> What the standard[1] suggests, but does not
> require, is the use of the first strong directional character in the
> paragraph.
You are wrong, it does require that. See below.
> the standard sa
On 06/25/2012 08:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:02:48 +0300
>> From: Shachar Shemesh
>> Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>>
>>> Therefore there is no
>>> need for HTML to send RTL emails, nor is there technical need for the
>>> email client to guess.
>> Except there so no stan
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:00:07 +0300
> From: Shachar Shemesh
> CC: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>
> On 06/25/2012 08:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:02:48 +0300
> >> From: Shachar Shemesh
> >> Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> >>
> >>> Therefore there is no
> >>> need for HTM
Hi
Does anybody know/use any good, open source software for hosting a gallery
on a web server?
Ideally it should be:
- indexed
- searchable
- easy to browse/navigate
- have author pages
- links to the same artwork in several sizes
- and of course have different functionality for
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Mordechai Behar <
mordecha.be...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> Hi
> Does anybody know/use any good, open source software for hosting a gallery
> on a web server?
> Ideally it should be:
>
>- indexed
>- searchable
>- easy to browse/navigate
>- have auth
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: Linux HTML mail agent
with RTL and LTR paragraph explicit support":
> I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed
> for, well, embedding. What the standard[1] suggests, but does not
> require, is the use of the first s
On 06/25/2012 09:56 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Outlook employs a higher level protocol. It is "all paragraphs are LTR,
>> unless the user presses CTRL+RIGHT SHIFT, in which case all paragraphs
>> are RTL". It is a valid, standard conforming protocol
> Again, I think such an interpretation is again
On 06/25/2012 11:22 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: Linux HTML mail agent
> with RTL and LTR paragraph explicit support":
>> I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed
>> for, well, embedding. What the standard[1] suggests,
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:22:03 +0300
> From: Nadav Har'El
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: Linux HTML mail agent
> with RTL and LTR paragraph explicit support":
> > I disagree completely. The embedding control characters are designed
> > for, well, embedding. What th
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:12:01 +0300
> From: Shachar Shemesh
> CC: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>
> On 06/25/2012 09:56 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Outlook employs a higher level protocol. It is "all paragraphs are LTR,
> >> unless the user presses CTRL+RIGHT SHIFT, in which case all paragraphs
>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 04:28:33 +0300
> From: Shachar Shemesh
> Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>
> > no standard really specified what in a text file is a
> > "paragraph".
> And lucky for you that they don't. Even with the simple case of a plain
> text file, a paragraph is defined differently depe
19 matches
Mail list logo
