Re: New Freecell Solver gcc-4.5.0 vs. LLVM+clang Benchmark

2010-07-18 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010, Shlomi Fish wrote about "New Freecell Solver gcc-4.5.0 vs. LLVM+clang Benchmark": > On the other hand, with gcc-4.5.0 with "-flto" and "-fwhole-program" Freecell > Solver ran at 85.1303749084473 seconds. > > I admit that I ran the gcc benchmark with a good renice and only

Re: [Haifux] [HAIFUX LECTURE] Valgrind - from magic to science - Shachar Raindel

2010-07-18 Thread Orna Agmon Ben-Yehuda
Hello Avid Haifuxers, Shachar's talk is postponed to Monday, July 26th, 18:30 (same place and hour, next week) due to July 19th being 9th of Av. There will be no Haifux talk tomorrow (July 19th). Thanks Orna On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Orr Dunkelman wrote: > Next Monday, July 19th at 18:3

Re: New Freecell Solver gcc-4.5.0 vs. LLVM+clang Benchmark

2010-07-18 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Nadav, On Sunday 18 Jul 2010 10:03:32 Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010, Shlomi Fish wrote about "New Freecell Solver gcc-4.5.0 vs. LLVM+clang Benchmark": > > On the other hand, with gcc-4.5.0 with "-flto" and "-fwhole-program" > > Freecell Solver ran at 85.1303749084473 seconds. > >

Open Position in Motorola-BitBand - Platform

2010-07-18 Thread Raz
Position 3100: Software System Integrator Job Description: Responsible for the integration of Bitband's Software solution. The job includes development of Bitband Linux platform, Software integration with hardware components, source control, creation of builds, integration testing, installation ki

Re: New Freecell Solver gcc-4.5.0 vs. LLVM+clang Benchmark

2010-07-18 Thread Elazar Leibovich
While you're on to it. I expect to read in a benchmark report, the number of time the software was executed, the mean running time, and the standard deviation. Running and timing it once can hide a pretty large error. On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi Nadav, > > On Sunday

NO HAIFUX LECTURE TOMORROW (July 19th): Valgrind Lecture postponed

2010-07-18 Thread Eli Billauer
Hello all, I know this was just announced, but not loud enough, in my opinion, for this short notice: Shachar's talk is postponed to Monday, July 26th, 18:30 (same place and hour, next week) due to July 19th being 9th of Av. There will be no Haifux talk tomorrow (July 19th). Eli -- Web

[4SALE] iMac 17" 1.83GHz C2D, 1GB RAM, 160GB disk

2010-07-18 Thread Marc Volovic
And... to make matters worse - For sale an iMac 17": Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz 1GB RAM 160GB disk Mac OS X 10.5.8 ILS 1,500 OBRO Marc Volovic marcvolo...@me.com ___ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailm

Re: New Freecell Solver gcc-4.5.0 vs. LLVM+clang Benchmark

2010-07-18 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Sunday 18 Jul 2010 11:37:17 Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi Nadav, > > On Sunday 18 Jul 2010 10:03:32 Nadav Har'El wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010, Shlomi Fish wrote about "New Freecell Solver > > gcc-4.5.0 > > vs. LLVM+clang Benchmark": > > > On the other hand, with gcc-4.5.0 with "-flto" and "-fwhol

Re: New Freecell Solver gcc-4.5.0 vs. LLVM+clang Benchmark

2010-07-18 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Sunday 18 Jul 2010 11:56:33 Elazar Leibovich wrote: > While you're on to it. > I expect to read in a benchmark report, the number of time the software was > executed, the mean running time, and the standard deviation. Running and > timing it once can hide a pretty large error. > Perhaps you're

Re: New Freecell Solver gcc-4.5.0 vs. LLVM+clang Benchmark

2010-07-18 Thread Elazar Leibovich
The standard deviation can give you an estimation of the minimal running time. (99. of the samples are within X standard deviations below the average. Pick a high enough relative to the number of times you'll run the software, and you'll get an estimation of the minimum running time you'll