On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 05:06:26PM +0300, Noam Rathaus wrote:
> Hi Gabor,
>
> I didn't check the network traffic, or name resolving, though both are quite
> fast
>
> Both are running v5.10.0 i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi
What about glibc? Do you have libc6-i686 on the new one as well?
--
Tzafrir
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:47:15AM +0300, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 09:40:58 +0300
>> From: Dov Grobgeld
>> To: Jonathan Ben Avraham
>> Cc: ILUG
>> Subject: Re: eTextBooks (for kids)
>>
>> That argument is like the arguments
They are both running:
libc6 2.7-18
One (the slower one) also has
libc6-i686 2.7-18
(The machines are Debian based)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 05:06:26PM +0300, Noam Rathaus wrote:
> > Hi G
Hi,
I tried them both (the profilers), they just tell me which modules take a
lot of time load, not what the reason are, these modules are quite big, 1000
lines... which makes it harder to just start cutting through to understand
why simply doing:
"use MyModule"
Takes 0.5second to go through
The
Try to run the following on both machines:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use Time::HiRes;
($seconds, $microseconds) = Time::HiRes::gettimeofday;
print "Start: $seconds.$microseconds\n";
use DB;
($seconds, $microseconds) = Time::HiRes::gettimeofday;
print "loaded DB: $seconds.$microseconds\n";
Besides "use D
2009/9/9 Arie Skliarouk :
> Try to run the following on both machines:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> use Time::HiRes;
> ($seconds, $microseconds) = Time::HiRes::gettimeofday;
> print "Start: $seconds.$microseconds\n";
>
> use DB;
>
> ($seconds, $microseconds) = Time::HiRes::gettimeofday;
> print "loaded DB
Noam Rathaus wrote:
They are both running:
libc6 2.7-18
One (the slower one) also has
libc6-i686 2.7-18
Can you check if the file /etc/ld.so.nohwcap exists on the slower
machine? If so, remove it and retry.
libc6-i686 had a bug at one po
Hi Lior,
The file doesn't exist
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Lior Okman wrote:
> Noam Rathaus wrote:
>
> They are both running:
>> libc6 2.7-18
>>
>> One (the slower one) also has
>> libc6-i686 2.7-18
>>
>
> Can you check if the file /et
1) I know DB takes time to load, how will this help me?
2) /dev/zero took on the old machine 11second, on the new machine 6seconds -
doesn't really help as I already knew the new HW is faster on disk - this
through hdparm's speed testing
3) no entropy is access DB is a wrapper around DBI, nothing
Hi,
There's an outfit looking for a full time asterisk person
--
Thanks,
Uri
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
Uri Bruck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's an outfit looking for a full time asterisk person
>
>
Contact email - da...@a.co.il
I have no further details - please don't reply to me
--
Thanks,
Uri
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
___
Linux-il mailin
Boaz Rymland wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> Can anyone provide feedback on the following Acer laptop, or any other
> Acer Linux based laptops? (Interestingly, searching for "linux" word
> in laptop section in zap.co.il shows almost exclusively only Acer
> results: http://zap.co.il/models.aspx?sog=C-PCLap
12 matches
Mail list logo