Howdy All,We are looking into implementing a redundant DHCP system in our office. Our main office uses NT servers with Split Scope. I'd like to implement a linux failover DHCP system, using ISC's failover configuration. Does anyone have any experience with failover DHCP? We would test, of cours
Be careful.
I had my share doing this tricks, and from my experience, NT's/2K/2003
DHCP server implementation simply sucks, specially when it comes to
Linux machines receving IP's from NT machines.
My suggestion: Install any other DHCP server on your Windows machines
that works well with Linux.
TAU runs with two ISC version 3.0.2 on Linux RH3. Over 10,000 hosts,
most of them are assigned static addresses, but we also have a small
number of dynamic hosts. Works with no problems. Configuration of failover
was not complicated, although you need to specify the failover peer for
each pool o
Yup, forgot the name! ISC it is :)
Thanks,
Hetz
On 2/27/06, Yaron Zabary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> TAU runs with two ISC version 3.0.2 on Linux RH3. Over 10,000 hosts,
> most of them are assigned static addresses, but we also have a small
> number of dynamic hosts. Works with no problems. C
Dogtail is another testing tool, based on Python:
http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/
It's a rather new tool which was introduced in the GNOME circles last
year so it might be worth checking out.
Shlomi Fish wrote:
We are trying to set up qa for Denemo (denemo.sourceforge.net)
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> Dogtail is another testing tool, based on Python:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/
>
>
> It's a rather new tool which was introduced in the GNOME circles last
> year so it might be worth checking out.
finally! xrunner is toast ;)
(also
