The platform is Pentium 166 Laptop with 16MB.
The mission - hook it to the stereo in the living room to
play MP3 collections.
Graphical interface is very desirable.
Thank you,
Iftach
This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and is for the use of the intended recipients on
I want to second Aviram.
Aviram Jenik wrote:
>
> On Friday 21 May 2004 11:27, Joel Isaacson wrote:
> >
> > Here is an updated list of the talks I give on Open Source
> > Software. I give these talks, for the promotional value, gratis (for
> > free) to companies and groups, so that they understand
I had a Debian "sid" (unstable) machine to do that for a while
it was P166MMX with 48MB of ram and 10GB hdd.
The platform is Pentium 166 Laptop with 16MB.
Plays MP3 without any problem.
The mission - hook it to the stereo in the living room to
play MP3 collections.
Graphical interface is very de
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 12:19:17AM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> It does not find the modem device. Knowing why is practically
> impossible without the source or disassembly, sorry...
oooh, so THAT's what wrong with closed-source!
--
Dan Kenigsberghttp://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken
Tzafrir, the problem is that fork() is a kernel command (well taken from
posix, but still a kernel thingy), mingw etc.. will not have it, you
will need to use the ms-windows way for threading.. and fork () is not
one of them... :(
Ido
---
"We have the power who'll face the future
Cause we a
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 12:36:38PM +0300, ik wrote:
> Tzafrir, the problem is that fork() is a kernel command (well taken from
> posix, but still a kernel thingy), mingw etc.. will not have it, you
> will need to use the ms-windows way for threading.. and fork () is not
> one of them... :(
Tha
ik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tzafrir, the problem is that fork() is a kernel command (well taken
> from posix, but still a kernel thingy), mingw etc.. will not have it,
> you will need to use the ms-windows way for threading.. and fork () is
> not one of them... :(
Windows is (supposed to be)
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
That's not entirely accurate. fork() is several things, including a
POSIX API (specification) and a system call implementation. There's
nothing that says you can't implement a fork() wrapper on windows that
will conform to the fork API while being implemented using windows
AP
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Windows is (supposed to be) POSIX-compliant since NT-whatever - M$
would not be able to sell the system so successfully without some
degree of standard-compliance.
It has nothing to do with sales - as far as I remember the DOD (American
Department of Defense)
requires PO
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:39:51PM +, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> ik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Tzafrir, the problem is that fork() is a kernel command (well taken
> > from posix, but still a kernel thingy), mingw etc.. will not have it,
> > you will need to use the ms-windows way for thre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>
> >Windows is (supposed to be) POSIX-compliant since NT-whatever - M$
> > would not be able to sell the system so successfully without some
> > degree of standard-compliance.
>
> >
>
> It has nothing to do with sales - as far as I remember th
Christoph Bugel wrote:
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
That's not entirely accurate. fork() is several things, including a
POSIX API (specification) and a system call implementation. There's
nothing that says you can't implement a fork() wrapper on windows that
will conform to the fork API while being imple
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 12:36:38PM +0300, ik wrote:
> Tzafrir, the problem is that fork() is a kernel command (well taken from
> posix, but still a kernel thingy), mingw etc.. will not have it, you
> will need to use the ms-windows way for threading.. and fork () is not
> one of them... :(
>
A
On Saturday 22 May 2004 14:03, Amir Hardon wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to compile ddd,
> but it seems like some header files are missing in the ddd tarball,
> my first make try failed with this error:
> No rule to make target `../include/xregex.h', needed by `regex.o'
> After some non-helpful google-in
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A dirty solution that doesn't achieve exactly what you want but is the
> closest alternative to threads is to do a vfork and exec self with a
> special flag.
>
> This should work under mingw etc.
Check what vfork() does - it may simply fork() [e.g. unde
This is a test. Please ignore, Avraham
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I apologize for the large number of messages sent to the list. The idea
was to check if I managed to convince mut and pine to send the correct
return address. I was too impatient when checking the mail and I was under
the impression that the previous attempts did no get through. Sorry for
that.
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 05:36:32PM +, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > A dirty solution that doesn't achieve exactly what you want but is the
> > closest alternative to threads is to do a vfork and exec self with a
> > special flag.
> >
> > This should w
Quoting avraham rosenberg, from the post of Sun, 23 May:
> I apologize for the large number of messages sent to the list. The idea
> was to check if I managed to convince mut and pine to send the correct
> return address. I was too impatient when checking the mail and I was under
> the impressio
Diego Iastrubni wrote:
The question is very simple, how can i fork() under windows using c/c++?
Simple question, simple answer: If you're ready to use cygwin (which may
be as little as depending on one DLL), you have the fork() system call.
Cygwin's fork() is based upon Window's CreateProcess, wi
Perhaps everybody's junk filters are filtering this, but it's really
annoying to get two job-offer junk mails a week, which I can't do
anything about since they come through a mailing list (I usually report
all my junk through spamcop, but only the list owner is allowed to
report junk that came
Hi Herouth,
I thought that we decided that job offers that are Linux or Open
Source related are welcome on the list.
- yba
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Herouth Maoz wrote:
> Perhaps everybody's junk filters are filtering this, but it's really
> annoying to get two job-offer junk mails a week, which I
How about creaing a linux-il-jobs mailing list (and/or alias it
"opensource-jobs",
so people will understand it's not solely about directly-Linux-related
jobs)?
That way only interested people will receive such mails (after
moderation) and
others will be spared.
I think a non-commercial mailin
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 07:47:17AM +0300, Herouth Maoz wrote:
> Perhaps everybody's junk filters are filtering this, but it's really
> annoying to get two job-offer junk mails a week, which I can't do
Which job offers are you talking about? if it's Linux / FOSS related,
it's allowed.
Cheers,
On Monday 24 May 2004 08:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about creaing a linux-il-jobs mailing list (and/or alias it
> "opensource-jobs",
We don't have such a high volume of job posts to warrant a separate
mailing list (IMO).
It's far easier to agree that every job post will include a [JOB] i
25 matches
Mail list logo
