On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:49:55AM +0200, Eli Segal wrote:
> since I installed my new woody
> I get a strange lockup once in awhile and it always happens when I'm in the
> GDM login screen
>
Are you sure it's a gdm lockup? Sounds to me like an X server lockup.
When it locked up, did anything stil
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:51:49AM +0200, Eli Segal wrote:
> In the shell of EMacs it doesn't translate the color and stuff and all i see
> (let say from ls) is a lot of garbish ..like ]]2~
> how can I fix it ???
Either use eshell mode, which does color handling correctly, or stick
this in your .
Oron Peled wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 00:52:22 +0200 (IST)
Matan Ziv-Av <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Oron Peled wrote:
Another related issue. I hope nobody don't use '.' in your path
as root -- this is suicidal in terms of security.
Only on systems which (might) have malicio
hi.
i am looking for an experienced linux/unix programmer for a permanent
job. It is a remote work.
A candidate should have:
fluent c++,
more then a year experience in development for unix/linux,
experienced with encryption,
preferably experienced with LDAP, ssh
highly motivated, good comunicati
Hey,
I want to write a software design document (Ifiun in Hebew) (אפיון)
which will include text, picture (screens capture) and tables
It all should be in hebrew ofcourse, and easy transfer to html would be nice
What is the best tool for such kind of a job ( a stable one)
thanx
Eli
==
Somebody tried Intel C++ Compiler 7.0 for Linux ?
http://www.programmersparadise.com/Product.pasp?txtCatalog=Paradise&txtCategory=&txtProductID=I23+0A12
They claim 30% performance gain on gcc 3.2..
Michael
=
To uns
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:48:34PM +0200, Michael Sternberg wrote:
>
> Somebody tried Intel C++ Compiler 7.0 for Linux ?
>
http://www.programmersparadise.com/Product.pasp?txtCatalog=Paradise&txtCategory=&txtProductID=I23+0A12
Good article about it here:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?s
ביום שני 24 פברואר 2003, 12:51, Muli Ben-Yehuda כתב:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:48:34PM +0200, Michael Sternberg wrote:
> > Somebody tried Intel C++ Compiler 7.0 for Linux ?
>
> http://www.programmersparadise.com/Product.pasp?txtCatalog=Paradise&txtCate
>gory=&txtProductID=I23+0A12
>
> Good artic
Hi,
I have a dul boot syetem, because most of the sites my mother and father view
are not compatible with mozilla/konqueror, or xine/mplyer lucks the plugins
for vieweing the streaming medias.
I setup on windows mozilla (1.3b), as a browser for me, and the default mail
handler.
My mopm tried
> > They claim 30% performance gain on gcc 3.2..
>
> I've read (don't remember the source, sorry, maybe lkml) that
> snapshot gcc from CVS is closing the gap quickly.
My only gripe is that the compile speed itself is SSLLOOWWW... compiling X11
CVS + KDE CVS at the same time is a great way to s
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:19:55PM +0200, Hetz Ben-Hamo wrote:
> My only gripe is that the compile speed itself is
> SSLLOOWWW... compiling X11 CVS + KDE CVS at the same time is a
> great way to see how to bring your CPU to it's knees..
I prefer fast generated code to faster compile times. How o
Quoting Diego Iastrubni, from the post of Mon, 24 Feb:
>
> My mopm tried it, but she misses all the nice templates found in OE. I
> am talking about html mail, which look very nice and are inserted to
> the mail by pressing a button. Any one knows where can I find
> something similar to mozilla's
On 2003-02-24, Eli Segal wrote:
> In the shell of EMacs it doesn't translate the color and stuff and all i see
> (let say from ls) is a lot of garbish ..like ]]2~
>
> how can I fix it ???
>
Try using M-x term isntead of M-x shell - that's a true terminal emulator,
with color and everything, I've j
What's the point of running two such compilations in parallel?
They just compete on cpu and resources.
Have you tried to do the same (compile X11 and KDE CVS's at
the same time) with the GNU gcc and got better results?
> -Original Message-
> From: Hetz Ben-Hamo
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
no it doesn't
there is sense in compiling few things together.
as a matter of fact, it takes a lot less time to compile the kernel by
make -j 30 than by make
( at least on my computer)
the reson, is that on the time the cpu wait for the disk to write one
file or read another, it can compile ano
yes, certainly, I'm aware of "make -j 3", but two
separate projects which look at different files and parts of the
disk (causing lots of head skips, cache threshing etc)?
It just sounds wierd to me that someone will run two such
large compilations in parallel and then say that the compiler is
slow
Aren't we missing something here: The $305.99 price tag.
Oh, and let's not forget that dear old open source GCC can function as a
full cross compiler which also costs. We're stuck with Intel for now,
but who knows what we'll be using in a few years from now? Anyone
remember DEC, DG, Interdata .
I don't see how you concluded that this point was missed.
It still doesn't mean that it's not legitimate to look at the performance
gains these 306$ might give people who are willing to invest them.
I made a small bet with someone from management that our company will be
asked by a customer to ru
that depends that the configure script, Makefile, automake, or whatever
the package is using supports it.
I have had a lot of head heck to port open-software to HP recently, and
I know that many times you have to edit many files in the source in
order to force them respect your env.vars.
Noam
(a
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 16:14, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
> Aren't we missing something here: The $305.99 price tag.
>
> Oh, and let's not forget that dear old open source GCC can function as a
> full cross compiler which also costs. We're stuck with Intel for now,
> but who knows what we'll be using i
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:59:33PM +0200, Noam Meltzer wrote:
> (and thats assuming that the utility is written in such a way so every
> compiler will be able to compile it.
> but considering the amount of warnings in the source of everything
> (including kernel+qt+kde+gnome, and every thing mains
On 24 Feb 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Price tag isn't the issue - not be able to ever fix bugs is - or do you
> believe there are no bugsin the Intel compiler (not that I have ever
> worked with it)? if so I have a bridge here I'd be interested to sell
> you... :-)
Wasn't that bridge broken
Omer Zak wrote:
On 24 Feb 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Price tag isn't the issue - not be able to ever fix bugs is - or do you
believe there are no bugsin the Intel compiler (not that I have ever
worked with it)? if so I have a bridge here I'd be interested to sell
you... :-)
Wasn't that bridg
Omer Zak wrote:
On 24 Feb 2003, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Price tag isn't the issue - not be able to ever fix bugs is - or do you
believe there are no bugsin the Intel compiler (not that I have ever
worked with it)? if so I have a bridge here I'd be interested to sell
you... :-)
Wasn't that
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:32:26 +0200
Eli Segal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> which will include text, picture (screens capture) and tables
> It all should be in hebrew ofcourse, and easy transfer to html would be nice
>
> What is the best tool for such kind of a job ( a stable one)
My first choice
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:21:47 +0200
Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for 3D rendering, the guy was looking for:
> 1. fast, direct hardware access (not OpenGL's main thing)
> 2. 2D
>
> OpenGL has nothing to do with either. it can interface with DRI, but its
> main function is to standardize
On 24 Feb 2003 17:05:48 +0200
Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> " [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# grep processors /var/log/dmesg
>Total of 64 processors activated (76359.40 BogoMIPS). "
Have you put your Altix-3000 on the "linux-il used equipment list"
(together with Marc's Sparcs?)
I'l
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
> Aren't we missing something here: The $305.99 price tag.
>
> Oh, and let's not forget that dear old open source GCC can function as a
> full cross compiler which also costs. We're stuck with Intel for now,
> but who knows what we'll be using in a few ye
is there a problem with cardbus in linux?
do you have any recomendation about 16/32 bit?
tnx
kfir lavi
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubs
I think emacs handle SGML quite well ...
Is it right ?
- Original Message -
From: "Oron Peled" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eli Segal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: Software design document
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:32:26 +020
Omer Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there anything, which is original Israeli, and which is offered to
> gullible people to test their gullibility?
The network bridge developed by an Israeli startup perfectly
positioned to take over the dark fiber?
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31 matches
Mail list logo
