Linux and Solaris

1999-05-14 Thread Aviram Jenik
I don't know if you saw this: > PALO ALTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE) via NewsEdge > Corporation -- Sun Microsystems, Inc. today announced > compatibility between the Solaris(TM) operating > environment and Linux applications. Sun contributed > software to an open source development effort that allo

Re: Apache

1999-05-14 Thread Ben Nes Michael
my Examp that work hope its help ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /var/httpd/jacobs-ladder/html ServerName jacobs-ladder.canaan.co.il ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /var/httpd/jacobs-ladder/cgi-bin/ ErrorLog /var/log/httpd/jacobs-ladder-error_log

More benchmarks

1999-05-14 Thread Aviram Jenik
PC Week and PC Magazine followed-up on the benchmark tests of Windows NT vs. Linux (and added Solaris to the equation).   Linux comes out pretty bad, Solaris and NT come out best.   PC Week: Tests show more than numbershttp://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/jumps/0,4270,401961,00.htmlPC Magazi

benchmarks

1999-05-14 Thread Aviram Jenik
I forgot the most important thing: Microsoft has reacted to the claim that those benchmarks are wrong because non-linux experts conducted them, and offered an interesting challenge: http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/news/msnw/nt4vLinux.asp   -Aviram Jenik   "Addict

Re: More benchmarks

1999-05-14 Thread Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo
AJ>> Linux comes out pretty bad, Solaris and NT come out best. Am I sick of test messing Linux performance with Apache performance with Samba performece. Will those "testers" get a clue? Apache *is not* (I repeat: IS NOT) the fastest Web server for Linux, nor it's meant to be. Read Dean's commen

Re: DHCP Error

1999-05-14 Thread Vadim Vygonets
Quoth Isaac Aaron on Fri, May 14, 1999: > 192.168.0.0 worked for me. Good. > It seems that the dhcp daemon allows configuration for the interface > itself, > if you define it as a subnet (I don't know why someone would want to use > it, > but buy I can argue with that) I think that what you def

Re: i need some help with linux

1999-05-14 Thread Daniel Feiglin
I struck the same problem in April. I'm sending you Isaac Aaron's script by private email. You can also fiddle around with the pp0 network settings "by the book" and all should work. I'll deal with that in the private email. ^^KOSH^^ wrote: > hello. > > i am new with linux. > i had just installe

Re: Sendmail problem

1999-05-14 Thread Meir Litmanovich
My suggest is to rebuild .cf from scratch with your favorit options enabled . For sure, you do not need to write it yourself - just use m4 . Check m4's features: FEATURE(relay_entire_domain) FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX) FEATURE(relay_local_from) to help you with this specific problem . Meir

Re: Sendmail problem

1999-05-14 Thread Or Sagi
Hi, the "Right" way to allow such open relay is use some sort of authentication (That's what POP before SMTP is for), rather then keep an open relay. Having an open relay around will get you RBLed in no time ... check www.sendmail.org (and probably maps.vix.com, afair), for more informati

Re: CL Graphics Blaster - impressions?

1999-05-14 Thread Oded Arbel
From: Liran Zvibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Does it support (Hardware) OpenGL ? I might replace my ATI RageIIC (I don't likeits performace, >and I decided I need more then 4MB on the graphics card...) well, it supports OpenGL only through ICD wrapper on windowsnone the less Mesa-GL works fine an

HELP!!!!

1999-05-14 Thread none none
i cant load linux!!! when i try to boot up linux form a floppy (like i always do) it write's: "Error 0x10" what is that mean?! p.s i forgot to unmount my msdos partition, is that my problem? _ Do You Yahoo!? Free instant messaging and more a

Mach 64 server

1999-05-14 Thread Laporte, Justin
I have an ATI IIc 3d rage pro video card mach64 with internal Ramdac. I have tried all the mach 64 and ATI servers. Does anyone know of an X sever that will run on this card properly other than SVGA? Also I have always tried to probe clock during setup and it hangs, would selecting dont probe cloc

Re: Mach 64 server

1999-05-14 Thread Isaac Aaron
You need to get the latest version of XFree86, that is 3.3.3.1. Your current version (the one that comes with RHS Linux 5.2 is 3.3.2.X) doesn't support that card. You could have read it on the XFree86 FAQ. "Laporte, Justin" wrote: > I have an ATI IIc 3d rage pro video card mach64 with internal

XDM host chooser - an alternative

1999-05-14 Thread Alexander Indenbaum
Hi! I'm tired of ugly default host chooser which comes with XFree XDM. Can anyone recommend me an alternative? Alexander Indenbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XDM host chooser - an alternative

1999-05-14 Thread Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo
OA>> you can use KDM which comes with KDE, or - I know that the latest GNOME OA>> release also features their own replacement for XDM, but I don't remember OA>> how it's called (GDM ??) Yes, it's gdm. I use it, and it's OK. I even wrote random texture changer for it :) Textures are all from KDE :

Re: XDM host chooser - an alternative

1999-05-14 Thread Oded Arbel
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Alexander Indenbaum wrote: > I'm tired of ugly default host chooser which comes > with XFree XDM. Can anyone recommend me an alternative? you can use KDM which comes with KDE, or - I know that the latest GNOME release also features their own replacement for XDM, but I don'