Eli Marmor wrote:
> > It _is_ NOT stay away. If you do not need NFS, use it. If you do need NFS - be
> > very very careful. I have used it with NFS successfully (once) and
> > unsuccessfully (once). Caveat emptor.
>
> As a server or as a client? I.e. to NFS-mount a ReiserFS on another
> machine,
Ira Abramov wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 18 May 2000, Ira Abramov wrote:
> >
> > > I'm happy with ReiserFS now, what will XFS bring? will it work with LVM
> > > and other 2.4 features?
> >
> > What's the status of Journalling FS's right now? Can they be used for
> I'm happy with ReiserFS now, what will XFS bring? will it work with LVM
> and other 2.4 features?
Pretty much most of the stuff that they were telling about XFS are pretty
much as
stuff that in ReiserFS.
Regarding LVM : they are going to use it, but i didn't understood wether
they are
porting
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2000, Ira Abramov wrote:
>
> > I'm happy with ReiserFS now, what will XFS bring? will it work with LVM
> > and other 2.4 features?
>
> What's the status of Journalling FS's right now? Can they be used for
> production work?
> Also, do you
I saw very few familiar faces, all in all there were two lectures that
were REALLY worth attending, and those were the ones about XFS, CXFS and
the one about Clustering. unfortunately I missed thos two, but I
understand Omer Musaev and maybe others were there. can anyone supply us
with some diges
