On 30 Dec 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> I have made progress though: I had the vmware service (but not vmware
> itself) running. I killed it, and now "/sbin/service smb status" says
> smbd is running, and I can conenct to 139. I still cannot connect to
> 901.
>
> I would be really interested to
Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I start samba (with "/sbin/service smb start" or equivalent), get OK
> > from both smbd and nmbd, and I expect to be able to use port 139 and
> > port 901 (SWAT). I get "connection refused" on both.
>
> 901 is swat, not directly related to the samba d
On 30 Dec 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I must be really dense today, but there is something weird with samba
> on the RH7.3 system I am using at work.
[... details were snipped ...]
Few weeks ago I had problems with Samba on RH7.3.
I RTFMed: /usr/share/doc/samba-2.2.3a/docs/textdocs/D
On 30 Dec 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I must be really dense today, but there is something weird with samba
> on the RH7.3 system I am using at work.
>
> kernel-2.4.18-3
> samba-2.2.3a-6
> initscripts-6.67-1
>
> I start samba (with "/sbin/service smb start" or equivalent), get OK
> fr
Hi,
I must be really dense today, but there is something weird with samba
on the RH7.3 system I am using at work.
kernel-2.4.18-3
samba-2.2.3a-6
initscripts-6.67-1
I start samba (with "/sbin/service smb start" or equivalent), get OK
from both smbd and nmbd, and I expect to be able to use port
