No problem really: pppoe + ppp's asyncmap 0, RFC 2516, Debian, Actcom.

2003-09-30 Thread Shaul Karl
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:45:18PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't quite follow - what are you trying to get to? A few days ago, at http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Linux/maillists/03/09/msg00600.html, I wondered whether the pppoe connection to ActCom might not be RFC compliant. Sin

Re: pppoe + ppp's asyncmap 0, RFC 2516, Debian, Actcom.

2003-09-26 Thread linux-il
I am connected from Debian through Actcom (PPPoE, Samsung's blue iron ethernet ADSL modem) and don't have "asyncmap 0" in my dsl-provider file. The closest I get to mention asyncmap is a comment-out of "default-asyncmap". Besides, according to the pppd manual multiple asyncmap's are OR'ed, so there

pppoe + ppp's asyncmap 0, RFC 2516, Debian, Actcom.

2003-09-26 Thread Shaul Karl
I believe that asyncmap 0 is required in order to get connected to the Internet through ActCom, both on dial up and ADSL lines. The point is that Debian's latest suggestion for /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider asserts the following: # RFC 2516, paragraph 7 mandates that the following