2009/4/23 Geoffrey Mendelson :
> That's because there are three different networks involved here.
> Orange runs 3 networks. a 900mHz GSM (voice and data up to 14.4kbps if
> they allow it), 1800Mhz (voice, 14.4k data and higher speed data
> (GPRS?) ) and a 2.1gHz 3G network. The 900 mHz network cove
Hi,
>Skype is a different issue since it communicate via port 80, though
>need a much more advance management tools to be filtered (what's
>called Traffic shaping).
Are you sure about it ? What do you mean by that ??
Does Skype send the **Audio** in ***TCP*** port 80 ?!
Can TCP do the job for VOI
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:34 PM, nir grinberg wrote:
> The current issue with the
> providers are the fact that their data network coverage is not similar
> to their GSM coverage. in many locations you will be able to talk via
> GSM, but receive a very poor data connection.
That's because there
> i want a new Internet connection for my home.
>
Stay away from Netvision. While their network is the best in Israel
when it works, their customer support is terrible, and after
experiencing three days of downtime in January I moved to Bezeq
Beinleumi. Netvision does not see three days of downtim
I know for a fact that both Cellcom and Orange initially blocked VoIP
ports on their data services network. Following some "pressure" ;)
applied on them (by us as well); the networks were opened and today
"theoretically" support VoIP applications. The current issue with the
providers are the fact
Oleg, first thanks for your answer.
>> AFAIK, this DPI can block voip application like Skype.
>That's an on-going war, similar to the war between P2P applications
>and DPI. It's not limited to cellular companies, of course.
There is still a little difference here, I believe, with cellular compan
Time to use traceroute to find the dropping node.
I'd go for mtr
Note that some network components are dropping pings directed to them, but the
nodes located after these will still show 0% packet loss.
#
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Erez D wrote:
> i have no problems with download speed
>
> my pi
On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
If one uses Skype over GPRS then the cell phone company can do DPI, I
suppose. They do get paid for GPRS usage, but a lot of it may be flat
rate. In Israel free Wi-Fi is common enough so using GPRS does not
make much sense in the first place,
Rafi Gordon writes:
> I heard that some cellular companies installed a blocking mechansim
> for their intenet clients which is called DPI. see:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dpi
And choose "Deep Packet Inspection" from the options... ;-)
> AFAIK, this DPI can block voip application like Skype
Hi,
>first i thought of trying the cellular companies. any experience with them ?
>are they
I have a question regarding the cellular companies internet service:
I heard that some cellular companies installed a blocking mechansim
for their intenet clients
which is called DPI.
see: http://en.wikipe
I'm using Nezeq-Intl + Hot with no such issues. But:
* I'm connecting via a router that manages the connection for me (I
guess I would have still felt it - and I'm not).
* maybe talk to them and try to change the connection type -
pptp/ppoe/direct/etc. (I was using pptp until a few days and n
2009/4/21 Erez D :
> hi
>
> i want a new Internet connection for my home.
>
> first i thought of trying the cellular companies. any experience with them ?
> are they good ?
Going back to your original question, Orange has a 5g a month limit,
which IMHO is worthless. I don't think they have an "all
btw, disabling ipv6 didn't help either
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009 12:25:54 Erez D wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Shlomi Fish
> wrote:
> > > Hi Erez (and all)!
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 11:10:48 Erez D wrote:
> > > > hi
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 12:25:54 Erez D wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Hi Erez (and all)!
> >
> > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 11:10:48 Erez D wrote:
> > > hi
> > >
> > > i want a new Internet connection for my home.
> > >
> > > first i thought of trying the cellula
i found the following link:
http://www.internet-2.org.il/%D7%93%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%92_%D7%A1%D7%A4%D7%A7%D7%99%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%90%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%98%D7%A8%D7%A0%D7%98/
don't know how to regard the results though ...
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Geoffrey Mendelson <
geoffreymendel...@gmail.co
i have no problems with download speed
my ping is acting strange. it works for the first N icmps (N is a number
between 30 and 150, changes every time), then it stops working.
i spoke with bbl - they can find no problems although i (bbl+hot) and my mom
(bbl+adsl) have the same problem
On Tue, A
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi Erez (and all)!
>
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009 11:10:48 Erez D wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > i want a new Internet connection for my home.
> >
> > first i thought of trying the cellular companies. any experience with
> them
> > ? are they good ?
> >
Try:
http://speed.hot.net.il/script/DownloadSpeed.asp
And check your effective bandwidth.
Also check packet loss statistics with ping and/or hping.
With this information you will be able to get decent support from bbl.
#
On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Erez D wrote:
> hi
>
> i want a new Internet conn
Hi Erez (and all)!
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 11:10:48 Erez D wrote:
> hi
>
> i want a new Internet connection for my home.
>
> first i thought of trying the cellular companies. any experience with them
> ? are they good ?
>
> i am still connected to bbl+hot. i experience problems in creating a
> co
hi
i want a new Internet connection for my home.
first i thought of trying the cellular companies. any experience with them ?
are they good ?
i am still connected to bbl+hot. i experience problems in creating a
connection. one of every 10 connections doesn't open, and i need to reload
the page .
Hi,
I'm trying to initiate a VPN connection over the net with no success.
Sniffing the interface shows that the VPN client is using the ESP
protocol (Layer _4_ protocol #50, Encapsulated Security Payload), and I
can see only outgoing packets and NO INCOMING ones.
Looks like the ISP blocks the ESP
Quoting Gilad Ben-Yossef, from the post of Tue, 04 May:
>
> The reason they charge more for a fixed IP is the same reason dogs
> leak their genitals: because they can. Or to put it in "economic"
> terms: because people are willing to pay extra for it. It has nothing
> to do with the their cost.
I've followed this thread since it matters me for the same reason it
does to you.
Why did they gave it for no charge earlier ? maybe they still had free
static's to give but all other ISPs did charge. In comparison to them
they could have charge without any doubts.
I called them to learn of th
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Ira,
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 08:10, Ira Abramov wrote:
indeed you should have. when my current prepaid year is up I intend to
make it VERY clear to them that I do not intend to pay more for the
service that was so far built-in. afterall my machine is online 24/7,
what diff
Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Yonah Russ, from the post of Mon, 03 May:
they wanted me to pay 200- I complained and they lowered it to 150. I
should have complained more.
indeed you should have. when my current prepaid year is up I intend to
make it VERY clear to them that I do not intend to
Ira,
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 08:10, Ira Abramov wrote:
> indeed you should have. when my current prepaid year is up I intend to
> make it VERY clear to them that I do not intend to pay more for the
> service that was so far built-in. afterall my machine is online 24/7,
> what difference does it mak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 05:10, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Yonah Russ, from the post of Mon, 03 May:
> > they wanted me to pay 200- I complained and they lowered it to 150. I
> > should have complained more.
>
> indeed you should have. when my current
Quoting Yonah Russ, from the post of Mon, 03 May:
> they wanted me to pay 200- I complained and they lowered it to 150. I
> should have complained more.
indeed you should have. when my current prepaid year is up I intend to
make it VERY clear to them that I do not intend to pay more for the
servi
Hey all,
Yep, I get that many assortment of connection attempts to the various ports
described here. Indeed, portmapper is really the favorite on my machine
lately :-) .
What a typo I had below - I meant to say that connecting Barak in extremely
UNuseful !... :-)
I talked to them on the phone,
o much about it. I don't think it's even
illegal in Israel.
Haim.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Boaz Rymland
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:29 AM
> To: Linux IL (E-mail)
> Subject: [OT] ISPs and kid sc
On Thu, May 24, 2001, Boaz Rymland wrote about "[OT] ISPs and kid scanning your
computer":
>...
> The thing is I get many many scans, and I can see only the non-stealth ones.
> I'm being scanned many times per connection to the net, which is nowadays
> almost daily.
> The thing is I get many many scans, and I can see only the
> non-stealth ones.
<--- snip --->
> I was wandering if people subscribed to other ISPs also get many
> scans as I,
> or this is something Barak excels at (having too many
> kids-with-much-spare-time-on-their-hands...) .
I was connected
Hi list,
I'm connected to the internet via Barak online, with a linux IP-masquerading
machine, with a decent IPChains setup in my kernel. I'm also using xconsole
so I see the deny & logged attempts to log into my machine.
The thing is I get many many scans, and I can see only the non-stealth one
33 matches
Mail list logo
