Pardon my nit-picking
> * gcc upgraded to 3.0 a long time ago, but most distros continued to
> supply 2.9.5/2.9.6 as their default. April's distros will fell safe
> enough to finally upgrade.
I think maybe SuSE will move GCC 3.0 (maybe also debian - I don't follow
debian so much), but R
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Eli Marmor wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
> >
>
> * GNOME is going to release 2.0 on March 15.
It seems I wasn't following their release schedule that well.
Anybody working on updating the translation files of gnome (to reflact
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
>
> > we'll be doing a big "don't be afraid of Linux" story soon.
> > but i think it might better to wait until KDE3.0 is released and hebrew
> > support will be optimal.
> > btw, does KDE3.0 really deliver in the hebrew field as pro
Hi,
Arash Zeini, Roozbeh and I are working on KDE 3.0 in FarsiKDE ml
(http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/farsikde), we have a meeting
in two days, to findout the current problems, let us know of any
problems specific to hebrew.
Yours,
behdad
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > Can all programs accept hebrew text? Can I simply type Hebrew into any KDE
> > program and view it "right"?
>
> You mean like this? http://witch.dyndns.org/stuff/ynet.png (take a look at
> the URL bar)
smilies are tricky when bidi is involved :-(
If
> Can all programs accept hebrew text? Can I simply type Hebrew into any KDE
> program and view it "right"?
You mean like this? http://witch.dyndns.org/stuff/ynet.png (take a look at
the URL bar)
Hetz
=
To unsubscribe, send mail t
> Right now it is a beta, and betas crash. But is bidi in QT (QT, not
> konqueror) feature-complete?
Feature complete? I think yes, you're welcome to check out from kde's cvs the
"qt-copy" and use it.
> If konqueror has some problems rendering visual hebrew sites, then it's
> tough. However: d
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > apart from hebrew text editing, linux and kde 2.2 already fulfill all my
> > humble needs, really
>
> I definately understand you on this issue...
>
> However - as much as I hate to say it - KDE 3.0 is still not OK (IMHO)
> for end users right now.
> hmmm... well, it might be jumping a bit too fast, you're right. but it
> was just meant as a metaphor to how much i'm waiting for the proper bidi
> support to happen.
> apart from hebrew text editing, linux and kde 2.2 already fulfill all my
> humble needs, really (although the ximian connector
> And that (IMHO) would be a very foolish step (again, IMHO)
> ...
> So as for your formatting XP - allow me to suggest to you -
> stay with your XP
> for now - and only when you see that all your needs can be
> fulfilled with
> Linux - then switch to Linux, and even then - I suggest you
> le
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 00:08, Dvir Volk wrote:
> I'll be keeping my fingers crossed. editing complex texts with kde2.2
> and biditext is very uncomfortable.
> if KDE would be able to provide a bidi level that even will enable me to
> edit long hebrew articles on it, i swear i'll format my XP
--Original Message-
From: Hetz Ben Hamo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:59 PM
To: Dvir Volk; Ben-Nes Michael; linux ILUG
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: nice article - good for pushng linux :)
On Tuesday 29 January 2002 13:47, Dvir Volk wrote:
> thanks :-)
&
> Globes is broken in Mozilla, too - not just on Linux. So maybe it's
> Globes' fault, not Konqueror (as in: "We test only on MSIE, because
> everybody uses MSIE, don't they?")
No such thing with the KHTML developers - if you can see it with MSIE
(without any special plugins like shockwave) - th
> Which makes me raise a question: are we going to see for the first time
> ever (or at least since Redhat 5) a Redhat release numbered *.3 (i.e.,
> 7.3)?
Nop, no such a beast will exist.
> What I mean is, is there any chance that a new gcc will be stable enough
> in 2 months to be useful as the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "Re: nice article - good for pushng
linux :)":
> RedHat 8.0 will include KDE 3, new GLIBC, new GCC (3.1) and will not make
> binary compatible with older versions of RedHat 7.x, but of-course - will be
> able to load/run RH 7
At 20:58 +0200 on 29/1/2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> (Ynet and Nana look ok, but
> Globes seems totally broken)
Globes is broken in Mozilla, too - not just on Linux. So maybe it's
Globes' fault, not Konqueror (as in: "We test only on MSIE, because
everybody uses MSIE, don't they?")
Herouth
> That will take some time. I'm not sure if next versions of mandrake (8.2)
> and redhat (8.0?)will include it, although I'll figure that at least
> Mandrake will try very hard.
>
> But those will only be out on around March or April (I believe).
Mandrake 8.2 will include KDE 2.2.2, not KDE 3.0
On Tuesday 29 January 2002 13:47, Dvir Volk wrote:
> thanks :-)
> we'll be doing a big "don't be afraid of Linux" story soon.
> but i think it might better to wait until KDE3.0 is released and hebrew
> support will be optimal.
> btw, does KDE3.0 really deliver in the hebrew field as promised?
Wel
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > we'll be doing a big "don't be afraid of Linux" story soon.
> > but i think it might better to wait until KDE3.0 is released and hebrew
> > support will be optimal.
> > btw, does KDE3.0 really deliver in the hebrew field as promised?
>
> That will take some time. I'm not
Nes Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:42 AM
> To: linux ILUG
> Subject: nice article - good for pushng linux :)
>
>
> http://magazine.nana.co.il/thestory.asp?storyid=2601
>
> --
> Canaan Surfing Ltd.
> Internet Se
http://magazine.nana.co.il/thestory.asp?storyid=2601
--
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-4-6991122
http://sites.canaan.co.il
--
=
To
21 matches
Mail list logo
