and your scenario was tested with TCP connections?
with udp "connections" (e.g. video streaming over UDP)?
how does it handle making sure all packets belonging to the same "virtual
stream" are sent via the same route?
--guy
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Erez D wrote:
> i'm trying to describe shortly ho
the problem with the howto on LARTC was that it didn't really explain wat it was doing
so unless you have the same scenario, it will not work
i'm trying to describe shortly how to do that,
if one have any problems, i will be happy to help
maybe i'll write a more detailed howto later
first use usu
of cource i did 'ip route del default' before ;-)
(otherwise i would get an error, anyway)
no, everything else works, all the other static routes work to both ppp0 and eth3,
and if i swap the order of the command line, then ppp0 works as default
but not eth3, so it seems the problem is not specifi
Hi,
one other thought:
the ppp0 is a tunnel - it is carried upon another, real, interface.
is it possible that after you have changed the default route you
caused the ppp0 to stop working?
Noam
On 8/17/05, Erez D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
>
> the command line i have used originated from
Hi Erez,
I'm not sure why you network acts like it's dead, but I can only
assume that the route command you have used did something bad to the
routing table (just a guess: maybe you need to execute: 'ip r del
default' before?).
Anyhow, what I do know (and from experience) is that the route command
noam,
first, thanks for your reply.
i wrote the original mail after reading the howto.
i removed the tables, for debug simplicity.
i used ping, so there is no need for all the packages be sent to the same interface as
ping is connectionless
(anyway, linux cache the route and so will do send all
Hi,
The command for itself is not enough. The problem is that you send one
packet from interface A and the other from interface B. Each interface
has a different IP and thus the target machine will not know how to
handle it. (It's a bit more complicated, but n/m for now)
What you need to achieve i
hi
the command line i have used originated from
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
about: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes
are you aware of a specific bug/patch relevant the command i issued,
or is it just a pointer to the patches available in general.
10x
erez.
On 8/17/05, Noa
Hi Erez,
What you are requesting to do is not trivial, though not too complicated.
Basically I would suggest you'll read the following documents (the
first has a link for the second, but it was worth mentioning here
too):
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#
hi
i have 2 internet connetions: via eth3 and ppp0
i wanted to do load balancing so i did:
ip route add default nexthop via dev eth3 weight1 nexthop via dev ppp0 weight 1
i test by pinging the internet
i get funny results:
if the route was selected via ppp0 then it works
if the route was sel
10 matches
Mail list logo
